Is a behavioral measure the best estimate of behavioral parameters? Perhaps not

George S. Howard, Scott E. Maxwell, Richard L Wiener, Kathy S. Boynton, William M. Rooney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In many areas of psychological research various measurement procedures are employed in order to obtain estimates of some set of parameter values. A common practice is to validate one measurement device by demonstrating its relationship to some criterion. However, in many cases the measurement of that criterion is less than a perfect estimate of true parameters. Self-report measures are often val idated by comparing them with behavioral mea sures of the dimension of interest. This procedure is only justifiable insofar as the behavioral measure represents an accurate estimate of population parameters. Three studies, dealing with the assess ment of assertiveness, students' in-class verbal and nonverbal behaviors, and a number of teacher-stu dent in-class interactions, tested the adequacy of behavioral versus self-report measures as accurate estimates of behavioral parameters. In Studies 2 and 3 self-reports were found to be as good as be havioral measures as estimates of behavioral pa rameters, while Study 1 found self-reports to be sig nificantly superior.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)293-311
Number of pages19
JournalApplied Psychological Measurement
Volume4
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1980

Fingerprint

Self Report
Verbal Behavior
measurement procedure
Assertiveness
Students
Psychology
Equipment and Supplies
teacher
interaction
Research
Population
student

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Is a behavioral measure the best estimate of behavioral parameters? Perhaps not. / Howard, George S.; Maxwell, Scott E.; Wiener, Richard L; Boynton, Kathy S.; Rooney, William M.

In: Applied Psychological Measurement, Vol. 4, No. 3, 01.01.1980, p. 293-311.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Howard, George S. ; Maxwell, Scott E. ; Wiener, Richard L ; Boynton, Kathy S. ; Rooney, William M. / Is a behavioral measure the best estimate of behavioral parameters? Perhaps not. In: Applied Psychological Measurement. 1980 ; Vol. 4, No. 3. pp. 293-311.
@article{97134b63bc544b77ac577c1c44aa4e2b,
title = "Is a behavioral measure the best estimate of behavioral parameters? Perhaps not",
abstract = "In many areas of psychological research various measurement procedures are employed in order to obtain estimates of some set of parameter values. A common practice is to validate one measurement device by demonstrating its relationship to some criterion. However, in many cases the measurement of that criterion is less than a perfect estimate of true parameters. Self-report measures are often val idated by comparing them with behavioral mea sures of the dimension of interest. This procedure is only justifiable insofar as the behavioral measure represents an accurate estimate of population parameters. Three studies, dealing with the assess ment of assertiveness, students' in-class verbal and nonverbal behaviors, and a number of teacher-stu dent in-class interactions, tested the adequacy of behavioral versus self-report measures as accurate estimates of behavioral parameters. In Studies 2 and 3 self-reports were found to be as good as be havioral measures as estimates of behavioral pa rameters, while Study 1 found self-reports to be sig nificantly superior.",
author = "Howard, {George S.} and Maxwell, {Scott E.} and Wiener, {Richard L} and Boynton, {Kathy S.} and Rooney, {William M.}",
year = "1980",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/014662168000400302",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "293--311",
journal = "Applied Psychological Measurement",
issn = "0146-6216",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is a behavioral measure the best estimate of behavioral parameters? Perhaps not

AU - Howard, George S.

AU - Maxwell, Scott E.

AU - Wiener, Richard L

AU - Boynton, Kathy S.

AU - Rooney, William M.

PY - 1980/1/1

Y1 - 1980/1/1

N2 - In many areas of psychological research various measurement procedures are employed in order to obtain estimates of some set of parameter values. A common practice is to validate one measurement device by demonstrating its relationship to some criterion. However, in many cases the measurement of that criterion is less than a perfect estimate of true parameters. Self-report measures are often val idated by comparing them with behavioral mea sures of the dimension of interest. This procedure is only justifiable insofar as the behavioral measure represents an accurate estimate of population parameters. Three studies, dealing with the assess ment of assertiveness, students' in-class verbal and nonverbal behaviors, and a number of teacher-stu dent in-class interactions, tested the adequacy of behavioral versus self-report measures as accurate estimates of behavioral parameters. In Studies 2 and 3 self-reports were found to be as good as be havioral measures as estimates of behavioral pa rameters, while Study 1 found self-reports to be sig nificantly superior.

AB - In many areas of psychological research various measurement procedures are employed in order to obtain estimates of some set of parameter values. A common practice is to validate one measurement device by demonstrating its relationship to some criterion. However, in many cases the measurement of that criterion is less than a perfect estimate of true parameters. Self-report measures are often val idated by comparing them with behavioral mea sures of the dimension of interest. This procedure is only justifiable insofar as the behavioral measure represents an accurate estimate of population parameters. Three studies, dealing with the assess ment of assertiveness, students' in-class verbal and nonverbal behaviors, and a number of teacher-stu dent in-class interactions, tested the adequacy of behavioral versus self-report measures as accurate estimates of behavioral parameters. In Studies 2 and 3 self-reports were found to be as good as be havioral measures as estimates of behavioral pa rameters, while Study 1 found self-reports to be sig nificantly superior.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84965911597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84965911597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/014662168000400302

DO - 10.1177/014662168000400302

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 293

EP - 311

JO - Applied Psychological Measurement

JF - Applied Psychological Measurement

SN - 0146-6216

IS - 3

ER -