Investigations of orchestra auralizations using the multi-channel multi-source auralization technique

Michelle C. Vigeant, Lily M Wang, Jens Holger Rindel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Room acoustics computer modeling is a tool for generating impulse responses and auralizations from modeled spaces. The auralizations are commonly made from a single-channel anechoic recording of solo instruments. For this investigation, auralizations of an entire orchestra were created using a multi-channel multi-source auralization technique, involving individual five-channel anechoic recordings of each instrumental part of two symphonies. In the first study, these auralizations were subjectively compared to orchestra auralizations made using (a) a single omni-directional source, (b) a surface source, and (c) single-channel multi-source method. Results show that the multi-source auralizations were rated to be more realistic than the surface source ones and to have larger source width than the single omni-directional source auralizations. No significant differences were found between the one- and five-channel multi-source auralizations, though. In a second subjective study, one- and five-channel multi-source auralizations were created for three different orchestra configurations: "contemporary", with the first and second violin sections seated adjacent to each other; "traditional", with the first and second violin sections seated across from each other; and "random", with the various instrument sections mixed across the stage. Subjects were generally able to distinguish between these orchestra configurations when listening to the multi-source auralizations; however, in one instance, subjects could only discern differences between the orchestra configurations with the five-channel multi-source auralizations. Overall, the multi-source auralization technique was found to be an effective method for creating realistic orchestra auralizations, but using multichannel anechoic recordings with the multi-source method was not found to be a consistent advantage in all cases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)866-882
Number of pages17
JournalActa Acustica united with Acustica
Volume94
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2008

Fingerprint

recording
configurations
rooms
impulses
acoustics
Violin
Symphonies
Impulse
Computer Modeling
Solo
Acoustics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Music
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Cite this

Investigations of orchestra auralizations using the multi-channel multi-source auralization technique. / Vigeant, Michelle C.; Wang, Lily M; Rindel, Jens Holger.

In: Acta Acustica united with Acustica, Vol. 94, No. 6, 01.11.2008, p. 866-882.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4e867789950d4961ab32b9c5ba59df30,
title = "Investigations of orchestra auralizations using the multi-channel multi-source auralization technique",
abstract = "Room acoustics computer modeling is a tool for generating impulse responses and auralizations from modeled spaces. The auralizations are commonly made from a single-channel anechoic recording of solo instruments. For this investigation, auralizations of an entire orchestra were created using a multi-channel multi-source auralization technique, involving individual five-channel anechoic recordings of each instrumental part of two symphonies. In the first study, these auralizations were subjectively compared to orchestra auralizations made using (a) a single omni-directional source, (b) a surface source, and (c) single-channel multi-source method. Results show that the multi-source auralizations were rated to be more realistic than the surface source ones and to have larger source width than the single omni-directional source auralizations. No significant differences were found between the one- and five-channel multi-source auralizations, though. In a second subjective study, one- and five-channel multi-source auralizations were created for three different orchestra configurations: {"}contemporary{"}, with the first and second violin sections seated adjacent to each other; {"}traditional{"}, with the first and second violin sections seated across from each other; and {"}random{"}, with the various instrument sections mixed across the stage. Subjects were generally able to distinguish between these orchestra configurations when listening to the multi-source auralizations; however, in one instance, subjects could only discern differences between the orchestra configurations with the five-channel multi-source auralizations. Overall, the multi-source auralization technique was found to be an effective method for creating realistic orchestra auralizations, but using multichannel anechoic recordings with the multi-source method was not found to be a consistent advantage in all cases.",
author = "Vigeant, {Michelle C.} and Wang, {Lily M} and Rindel, {Jens Holger}",
year = "2008",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3813/AAA.918105",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "94",
pages = "866--882",
journal = "Acta Acustica united with Acustica",
issn = "1610-1928",
publisher = "S. Hirzel Verlag GmbH",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Investigations of orchestra auralizations using the multi-channel multi-source auralization technique

AU - Vigeant, Michelle C.

AU - Wang, Lily M

AU - Rindel, Jens Holger

PY - 2008/11/1

Y1 - 2008/11/1

N2 - Room acoustics computer modeling is a tool for generating impulse responses and auralizations from modeled spaces. The auralizations are commonly made from a single-channel anechoic recording of solo instruments. For this investigation, auralizations of an entire orchestra were created using a multi-channel multi-source auralization technique, involving individual five-channel anechoic recordings of each instrumental part of two symphonies. In the first study, these auralizations were subjectively compared to orchestra auralizations made using (a) a single omni-directional source, (b) a surface source, and (c) single-channel multi-source method. Results show that the multi-source auralizations were rated to be more realistic than the surface source ones and to have larger source width than the single omni-directional source auralizations. No significant differences were found between the one- and five-channel multi-source auralizations, though. In a second subjective study, one- and five-channel multi-source auralizations were created for three different orchestra configurations: "contemporary", with the first and second violin sections seated adjacent to each other; "traditional", with the first and second violin sections seated across from each other; and "random", with the various instrument sections mixed across the stage. Subjects were generally able to distinguish between these orchestra configurations when listening to the multi-source auralizations; however, in one instance, subjects could only discern differences between the orchestra configurations with the five-channel multi-source auralizations. Overall, the multi-source auralization technique was found to be an effective method for creating realistic orchestra auralizations, but using multichannel anechoic recordings with the multi-source method was not found to be a consistent advantage in all cases.

AB - Room acoustics computer modeling is a tool for generating impulse responses and auralizations from modeled spaces. The auralizations are commonly made from a single-channel anechoic recording of solo instruments. For this investigation, auralizations of an entire orchestra were created using a multi-channel multi-source auralization technique, involving individual five-channel anechoic recordings of each instrumental part of two symphonies. In the first study, these auralizations were subjectively compared to orchestra auralizations made using (a) a single omni-directional source, (b) a surface source, and (c) single-channel multi-source method. Results show that the multi-source auralizations were rated to be more realistic than the surface source ones and to have larger source width than the single omni-directional source auralizations. No significant differences were found between the one- and five-channel multi-source auralizations, though. In a second subjective study, one- and five-channel multi-source auralizations were created for three different orchestra configurations: "contemporary", with the first and second violin sections seated adjacent to each other; "traditional", with the first and second violin sections seated across from each other; and "random", with the various instrument sections mixed across the stage. Subjects were generally able to distinguish between these orchestra configurations when listening to the multi-source auralizations; however, in one instance, subjects could only discern differences between the orchestra configurations with the five-channel multi-source auralizations. Overall, the multi-source auralization technique was found to be an effective method for creating realistic orchestra auralizations, but using multichannel anechoic recordings with the multi-source method was not found to be a consistent advantage in all cases.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=59149098540&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=59149098540&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3813/AAA.918105

DO - 10.3813/AAA.918105

M3 - Article

VL - 94

SP - 866

EP - 882

JO - Acta Acustica united with Acustica

JF - Acta Acustica united with Acustica

SN - 1610-1928

IS - 6

ER -