Investigating the acceptability of behavioral interventions in applied conjoint behavioral consultation

Moving from analog conditions to naturalistic settings

Richard J. Cowan, Susan M Sheridan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Whereas there exists a vast literature investigating consumer satisfaction ratings of various behavioral interventions, the majority of these studies have been limited to analogue conditions, which may compromise utility and generalization. Additionally, most research has failed to explore multiple-source, multiple-setting data in the investigation of treatment acceptability. This study investigated parent, teacher, and child treatment acceptability ratings derived from field-based conjoint behavioral consultation cases. Data indicate that overall, parents, teachers, and children rated conjoint behavioral consultation-based behavioral interventions as very to highly acceptable. For parents, interventions with a reductive component were rated as more acceptable than interventions using both positive and negative components; no significant differences were found among teacher and child group ratings. For teachers, there was a positive relationship between (a) intervention complexity and treatment acceptability ratings and (b) problem severity ratings and treatment acceptability ratings. Additionally, regression analyses indicate that for teachers, the interaction of complexity and problem severity significantly predicted teacher treatment acceptability ratings, with teacher severity ratings demonstrating greater predictive validity. Implications of these findings and directions for future research are explored.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-21
Number of pages21
JournalSchool Psychology Quarterly
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2003

Fingerprint

Referral and Consultation
rating
teacher
parents
Parents
Therapeutics
teacher rating
Regression Analysis
compromise
Research
regression
interaction
Group

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

@article{76b6d4cf66bf41bf8419214bf050946e,
title = "Investigating the acceptability of behavioral interventions in applied conjoint behavioral consultation: Moving from analog conditions to naturalistic settings",
abstract = "Whereas there exists a vast literature investigating consumer satisfaction ratings of various behavioral interventions, the majority of these studies have been limited to analogue conditions, which may compromise utility and generalization. Additionally, most research has failed to explore multiple-source, multiple-setting data in the investigation of treatment acceptability. This study investigated parent, teacher, and child treatment acceptability ratings derived from field-based conjoint behavioral consultation cases. Data indicate that overall, parents, teachers, and children rated conjoint behavioral consultation-based behavioral interventions as very to highly acceptable. For parents, interventions with a reductive component were rated as more acceptable than interventions using both positive and negative components; no significant differences were found among teacher and child group ratings. For teachers, there was a positive relationship between (a) intervention complexity and treatment acceptability ratings and (b) problem severity ratings and treatment acceptability ratings. Additionally, regression analyses indicate that for teachers, the interaction of complexity and problem severity significantly predicted teacher treatment acceptability ratings, with teacher severity ratings demonstrating greater predictive validity. Implications of these findings and directions for future research are explored.",
author = "Cowan, {Richard J.} and Sheridan, {Susan M}",
year = "2003",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1521/scpq.18.1.1.20877",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "1--21",
journal = "School Psychology",
issn = "2578-4218",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Investigating the acceptability of behavioral interventions in applied conjoint behavioral consultation

T2 - Moving from analog conditions to naturalistic settings

AU - Cowan, Richard J.

AU - Sheridan, Susan M

PY - 2003/3/1

Y1 - 2003/3/1

N2 - Whereas there exists a vast literature investigating consumer satisfaction ratings of various behavioral interventions, the majority of these studies have been limited to analogue conditions, which may compromise utility and generalization. Additionally, most research has failed to explore multiple-source, multiple-setting data in the investigation of treatment acceptability. This study investigated parent, teacher, and child treatment acceptability ratings derived from field-based conjoint behavioral consultation cases. Data indicate that overall, parents, teachers, and children rated conjoint behavioral consultation-based behavioral interventions as very to highly acceptable. For parents, interventions with a reductive component were rated as more acceptable than interventions using both positive and negative components; no significant differences were found among teacher and child group ratings. For teachers, there was a positive relationship between (a) intervention complexity and treatment acceptability ratings and (b) problem severity ratings and treatment acceptability ratings. Additionally, regression analyses indicate that for teachers, the interaction of complexity and problem severity significantly predicted teacher treatment acceptability ratings, with teacher severity ratings demonstrating greater predictive validity. Implications of these findings and directions for future research are explored.

AB - Whereas there exists a vast literature investigating consumer satisfaction ratings of various behavioral interventions, the majority of these studies have been limited to analogue conditions, which may compromise utility and generalization. Additionally, most research has failed to explore multiple-source, multiple-setting data in the investigation of treatment acceptability. This study investigated parent, teacher, and child treatment acceptability ratings derived from field-based conjoint behavioral consultation cases. Data indicate that overall, parents, teachers, and children rated conjoint behavioral consultation-based behavioral interventions as very to highly acceptable. For parents, interventions with a reductive component were rated as more acceptable than interventions using both positive and negative components; no significant differences were found among teacher and child group ratings. For teachers, there was a positive relationship between (a) intervention complexity and treatment acceptability ratings and (b) problem severity ratings and treatment acceptability ratings. Additionally, regression analyses indicate that for teachers, the interaction of complexity and problem severity significantly predicted teacher treatment acceptability ratings, with teacher severity ratings demonstrating greater predictive validity. Implications of these findings and directions for future research are explored.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038575767&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038575767&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1521/scpq.18.1.1.20877

DO - 10.1521/scpq.18.1.1.20877

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 1

EP - 21

JO - School Psychology

JF - School Psychology

SN - 2578-4218

IS - 1

ER -