Intubation quality assurance thresholds

Cheryl Bagley Thompson, Kendra Balasz, Jeanette Goltermann, Lynn Eastes, Pauline Ignacio, Amy Koestner, Diana Pearson, Valerie Krasneski-Schreiber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Quality assurance (QA) and continuous quality improvement (CQI) are valued activities within health-care organizations. Quality assurance indicators as guidelines for quality practice usually are established intuitively. The purpose of this study was to determine an appropriate threshold for successful intubation in patients transported by air and to examine factors impacting this success rate. Setting: Fifteen rotor-wing programs from across the United States participated. Method: The study was a prospective descriptive design. A total of 369 flight crew members agreed to participate, and intubations were attempted on 862 patients during the 12-month study. Results: Intubations were attempted on 862 patients and were successful in 788 (91.4%) of the patients. Of the patients not successfully intubated, 14 received supplemental oxygen only, 25 were supported with bagvalve-mask, 26 received a surgical cricothyroidotomy and for nine patients it was unknown what form of airway support was provided. Conclusion: Factors impacting successful intubation include cardiac arrest, use of neuromuscular blockade, use of sedatives and facial trauma. Data from the study support a threshold for successful intubation of between 90% and 95%.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)55-60
Number of pages6
JournalAir medical journal
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1995

Fingerprint

Intubation
Neuromuscular Blockade
Masks
Quality Improvement
Heart Arrest
Hypnotics and Sedatives
Practice Guidelines
Air
Oxygen
Delivery of Health Care
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • continuous quality improvement
  • intubation
  • quality assurance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Emergency

Cite this

Bagley Thompson, C., Balasz, K., Goltermann, J., Eastes, L., Ignacio, P., Koestner, A., ... Krasneski-Schreiber, V. (1995). Intubation quality assurance thresholds. Air medical journal, 14(2), 55-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1067-991X(95)90095-0

Intubation quality assurance thresholds. / Bagley Thompson, Cheryl; Balasz, Kendra; Goltermann, Jeanette; Eastes, Lynn; Ignacio, Pauline; Koestner, Amy; Pearson, Diana; Krasneski-Schreiber, Valerie.

In: Air medical journal, Vol. 14, No. 2, 01.01.1995, p. 55-60.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bagley Thompson, C, Balasz, K, Goltermann, J, Eastes, L, Ignacio, P, Koestner, A, Pearson, D & Krasneski-Schreiber, V 1995, 'Intubation quality assurance thresholds', Air medical journal, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 55-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1067-991X(95)90095-0
Bagley Thompson C, Balasz K, Goltermann J, Eastes L, Ignacio P, Koestner A et al. Intubation quality assurance thresholds. Air medical journal. 1995 Jan 1;14(2):55-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1067-991X(95)90095-0
Bagley Thompson, Cheryl ; Balasz, Kendra ; Goltermann, Jeanette ; Eastes, Lynn ; Ignacio, Pauline ; Koestner, Amy ; Pearson, Diana ; Krasneski-Schreiber, Valerie. / Intubation quality assurance thresholds. In: Air medical journal. 1995 ; Vol. 14, No. 2. pp. 55-60.
@article{a18d524fb4e34b7f99cb0e0cb0e749b1,
title = "Intubation quality assurance thresholds",
abstract = "Introduction: Quality assurance (QA) and continuous quality improvement (CQI) are valued activities within health-care organizations. Quality assurance indicators as guidelines for quality practice usually are established intuitively. The purpose of this study was to determine an appropriate threshold for successful intubation in patients transported by air and to examine factors impacting this success rate. Setting: Fifteen rotor-wing programs from across the United States participated. Method: The study was a prospective descriptive design. A total of 369 flight crew members agreed to participate, and intubations were attempted on 862 patients during the 12-month study. Results: Intubations were attempted on 862 patients and were successful in 788 (91.4{\%}) of the patients. Of the patients not successfully intubated, 14 received supplemental oxygen only, 25 were supported with bagvalve-mask, 26 received a surgical cricothyroidotomy and for nine patients it was unknown what form of airway support was provided. Conclusion: Factors impacting successful intubation include cardiac arrest, use of neuromuscular blockade, use of sedatives and facial trauma. Data from the study support a threshold for successful intubation of between 90{\%} and 95{\%}.",
keywords = "continuous quality improvement, intubation, quality assurance",
author = "{Bagley Thompson}, Cheryl and Kendra Balasz and Jeanette Goltermann and Lynn Eastes and Pauline Ignacio and Amy Koestner and Diana Pearson and Valerie Krasneski-Schreiber",
year = "1995",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S1067-991X(95)90095-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "55--60",
journal = "Air Medical Journal",
issn = "1067-991X",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intubation quality assurance thresholds

AU - Bagley Thompson, Cheryl

AU - Balasz, Kendra

AU - Goltermann, Jeanette

AU - Eastes, Lynn

AU - Ignacio, Pauline

AU - Koestner, Amy

AU - Pearson, Diana

AU - Krasneski-Schreiber, Valerie

PY - 1995/1/1

Y1 - 1995/1/1

N2 - Introduction: Quality assurance (QA) and continuous quality improvement (CQI) are valued activities within health-care organizations. Quality assurance indicators as guidelines for quality practice usually are established intuitively. The purpose of this study was to determine an appropriate threshold for successful intubation in patients transported by air and to examine factors impacting this success rate. Setting: Fifteen rotor-wing programs from across the United States participated. Method: The study was a prospective descriptive design. A total of 369 flight crew members agreed to participate, and intubations were attempted on 862 patients during the 12-month study. Results: Intubations were attempted on 862 patients and were successful in 788 (91.4%) of the patients. Of the patients not successfully intubated, 14 received supplemental oxygen only, 25 were supported with bagvalve-mask, 26 received a surgical cricothyroidotomy and for nine patients it was unknown what form of airway support was provided. Conclusion: Factors impacting successful intubation include cardiac arrest, use of neuromuscular blockade, use of sedatives and facial trauma. Data from the study support a threshold for successful intubation of between 90% and 95%.

AB - Introduction: Quality assurance (QA) and continuous quality improvement (CQI) are valued activities within health-care organizations. Quality assurance indicators as guidelines for quality practice usually are established intuitively. The purpose of this study was to determine an appropriate threshold for successful intubation in patients transported by air and to examine factors impacting this success rate. Setting: Fifteen rotor-wing programs from across the United States participated. Method: The study was a prospective descriptive design. A total of 369 flight crew members agreed to participate, and intubations were attempted on 862 patients during the 12-month study. Results: Intubations were attempted on 862 patients and were successful in 788 (91.4%) of the patients. Of the patients not successfully intubated, 14 received supplemental oxygen only, 25 were supported with bagvalve-mask, 26 received a surgical cricothyroidotomy and for nine patients it was unknown what form of airway support was provided. Conclusion: Factors impacting successful intubation include cardiac arrest, use of neuromuscular blockade, use of sedatives and facial trauma. Data from the study support a threshold for successful intubation of between 90% and 95%.

KW - continuous quality improvement

KW - intubation

KW - quality assurance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029281252&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029281252&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S1067-991X(95)90095-0

DO - 10.1016/S1067-991X(95)90095-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 10143544

AN - SCOPUS:0029281252

VL - 14

SP - 55

EP - 60

JO - Air Medical Journal

JF - Air Medical Journal

SN - 1067-991X

IS - 2

ER -