Introducing political considerations into technical plans

A case study of nicaragua's economic reorganization in a post sandinista administration

Rodrigo Cantarero, John Gaber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Planners and politicians do not always agree on the best way of distributing resources. Usually, planners take to a technical strategy while politicians take to a constituent building strategy. The differences in opinion between planners and politicians is most acute in Nicaragua's post Sandinista Administration. Nicaraguan planners are addressing enormous economic problems while simultaneously trying to obtain outside assistance form the Multinational Financial Institutions (World Bank, IMF, Inter-American Development Bank). Politicians, on the other hand, are trying to stabilize the country's political system after a decade of the marxist Sandinista's control. The desperate political and economic situation in Nicaragua has made the already troubled marriage between planners and politicians more tenuous. In this paper we evaluate the inconsistencies between the technical and political modes of decision making. We draw on a case study of implementing a technical economic plan for the Nicaraguan government in 1992 to illustrate the differences of opinion between planners and politicians. In addition, we use the Nicaraguan case study to explore some considerations for reducing these inconsistencies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1583-1629
Number of pages47
JournalInternational Journal of Public Administration
Volume17
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1994

Fingerprint

Sandinista
Nicaragua
reorganization
politician
economics
political situation
economic situation
IMF
World Bank
political system
Economics
Reorganization
Politicians
bank
assistance
marriage
decision making
resources

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Public Administration

Cite this

@article{84fc170609a845f98b04d9c6d440076f,
title = "Introducing political considerations into technical plans: A case study of nicaragua's economic reorganization in a post sandinista administration",
abstract = "Planners and politicians do not always agree on the best way of distributing resources. Usually, planners take to a technical strategy while politicians take to a constituent building strategy. The differences in opinion between planners and politicians is most acute in Nicaragua's post Sandinista Administration. Nicaraguan planners are addressing enormous economic problems while simultaneously trying to obtain outside assistance form the Multinational Financial Institutions (World Bank, IMF, Inter-American Development Bank). Politicians, on the other hand, are trying to stabilize the country's political system after a decade of the marxist Sandinista's control. The desperate political and economic situation in Nicaragua has made the already troubled marriage between planners and politicians more tenuous. In this paper we evaluate the inconsistencies between the technical and political modes of decision making. We draw on a case study of implementing a technical economic plan for the Nicaraguan government in 1992 to illustrate the differences of opinion between planners and politicians. In addition, we use the Nicaraguan case study to explore some considerations for reducing these inconsistencies.",
author = "Rodrigo Cantarero and John Gaber",
year = "1994",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/01900699408524957",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "1583--1629",
journal = "International Journal of Public Administration",
issn = "0190-0692",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Introducing political considerations into technical plans

T2 - A case study of nicaragua's economic reorganization in a post sandinista administration

AU - Cantarero, Rodrigo

AU - Gaber, John

PY - 1994/1/1

Y1 - 1994/1/1

N2 - Planners and politicians do not always agree on the best way of distributing resources. Usually, planners take to a technical strategy while politicians take to a constituent building strategy. The differences in opinion between planners and politicians is most acute in Nicaragua's post Sandinista Administration. Nicaraguan planners are addressing enormous economic problems while simultaneously trying to obtain outside assistance form the Multinational Financial Institutions (World Bank, IMF, Inter-American Development Bank). Politicians, on the other hand, are trying to stabilize the country's political system after a decade of the marxist Sandinista's control. The desperate political and economic situation in Nicaragua has made the already troubled marriage between planners and politicians more tenuous. In this paper we evaluate the inconsistencies between the technical and political modes of decision making. We draw on a case study of implementing a technical economic plan for the Nicaraguan government in 1992 to illustrate the differences of opinion between planners and politicians. In addition, we use the Nicaraguan case study to explore some considerations for reducing these inconsistencies.

AB - Planners and politicians do not always agree on the best way of distributing resources. Usually, planners take to a technical strategy while politicians take to a constituent building strategy. The differences in opinion between planners and politicians is most acute in Nicaragua's post Sandinista Administration. Nicaraguan planners are addressing enormous economic problems while simultaneously trying to obtain outside assistance form the Multinational Financial Institutions (World Bank, IMF, Inter-American Development Bank). Politicians, on the other hand, are trying to stabilize the country's political system after a decade of the marxist Sandinista's control. The desperate political and economic situation in Nicaragua has made the already troubled marriage between planners and politicians more tenuous. In this paper we evaluate the inconsistencies between the technical and political modes of decision making. We draw on a case study of implementing a technical economic plan for the Nicaraguan government in 1992 to illustrate the differences of opinion between planners and politicians. In addition, we use the Nicaraguan case study to explore some considerations for reducing these inconsistencies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937306816&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937306816&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01900699408524957

DO - 10.1080/01900699408524957

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 1583

EP - 1629

JO - International Journal of Public Administration

JF - International Journal of Public Administration

SN - 0190-0692

IS - 9

ER -