Intraprocedural monitoring for endovascular procedures

Ali Khoynezhad, G Matthew Longo

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Peripheral (non-cardiac) endovascular interventions have penetrated the field of vascular surgery, and it is the standard of care in many occasions. Compared to traditional open peripheral operations, the minimal access and image-guided interventions have many advantages including shorter hospital stay and faster patient recovery. However, the interventions remain a high-risk procedure due to patients advanced age and significant comorbidities such as coronary artery disease and chronic renal and pulmonary disease. Procedure-specific factors further modulate the pre-existing risk factors and may add further complications during the procedure and in the postprocedural period. For example, in patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), specific complications such as spinal cord injury and stroke are the focus of intraprocedural neurophysiologic monitoring, because neurological deficits remain of the most devastating complications after peripheral endovascular interventions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationPeripheral Endovascular Interventions
PublisherSpringer New York
Pages63-73
Number of pages11
ISBN (Print)9781441913869
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2010

Fingerprint

Endovascular Procedures
Neurophysiological Monitoring
Standard of Care
Spinal Cord Injuries
Chronic Renal Insufficiency
Lung Diseases
Blood Vessels
Comorbidity
Coronary Artery Disease
Length of Stay
Thorax
Stroke

Keywords

  • Cerebrospinal fluid pressure monitoring
  • Intraprocedural monitoring for endovascular procedures
  • Monitoring during thoracic endovascular aortic repair
  • Neurologic monitoring

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Khoynezhad, A., & Longo, G. M. (2010). Intraprocedural monitoring for endovascular procedures. In Peripheral Endovascular Interventions (pp. 63-73). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1387-6_6

Intraprocedural monitoring for endovascular procedures. / Khoynezhad, Ali; Longo, G Matthew.

Peripheral Endovascular Interventions. Springer New York, 2010. p. 63-73.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Khoynezhad, A & Longo, GM 2010, Intraprocedural monitoring for endovascular procedures. in Peripheral Endovascular Interventions. Springer New York, pp. 63-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1387-6_6
Khoynezhad A, Longo GM. Intraprocedural monitoring for endovascular procedures. In Peripheral Endovascular Interventions. Springer New York. 2010. p. 63-73 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1387-6_6
Khoynezhad, Ali ; Longo, G Matthew. / Intraprocedural monitoring for endovascular procedures. Peripheral Endovascular Interventions. Springer New York, 2010. pp. 63-73
@inbook{c0d1d2e30933438c8a424022ed4c945b,
title = "Intraprocedural monitoring for endovascular procedures",
abstract = "Peripheral (non-cardiac) endovascular interventions have penetrated the field of vascular surgery, and it is the standard of care in many occasions. Compared to traditional open peripheral operations, the minimal access and image-guided interventions have many advantages including shorter hospital stay and faster patient recovery. However, the interventions remain a high-risk procedure due to patients advanced age and significant comorbidities such as coronary artery disease and chronic renal and pulmonary disease. Procedure-specific factors further modulate the pre-existing risk factors and may add further complications during the procedure and in the postprocedural period. For example, in patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), specific complications such as spinal cord injury and stroke are the focus of intraprocedural neurophysiologic monitoring, because neurological deficits remain of the most devastating complications after peripheral endovascular interventions.",
keywords = "Cerebrospinal fluid pressure monitoring, Intraprocedural monitoring for endovascular procedures, Monitoring during thoracic endovascular aortic repair, Neurologic monitoring",
author = "Ali Khoynezhad and Longo, {G Matthew}",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-1-4419-1387-6_6",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781441913869",
pages = "63--73",
booktitle = "Peripheral Endovascular Interventions",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Intraprocedural monitoring for endovascular procedures

AU - Khoynezhad, Ali

AU - Longo, G Matthew

PY - 2010/12/1

Y1 - 2010/12/1

N2 - Peripheral (non-cardiac) endovascular interventions have penetrated the field of vascular surgery, and it is the standard of care in many occasions. Compared to traditional open peripheral operations, the minimal access and image-guided interventions have many advantages including shorter hospital stay and faster patient recovery. However, the interventions remain a high-risk procedure due to patients advanced age and significant comorbidities such as coronary artery disease and chronic renal and pulmonary disease. Procedure-specific factors further modulate the pre-existing risk factors and may add further complications during the procedure and in the postprocedural period. For example, in patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), specific complications such as spinal cord injury and stroke are the focus of intraprocedural neurophysiologic monitoring, because neurological deficits remain of the most devastating complications after peripheral endovascular interventions.

AB - Peripheral (non-cardiac) endovascular interventions have penetrated the field of vascular surgery, and it is the standard of care in many occasions. Compared to traditional open peripheral operations, the minimal access and image-guided interventions have many advantages including shorter hospital stay and faster patient recovery. However, the interventions remain a high-risk procedure due to patients advanced age and significant comorbidities such as coronary artery disease and chronic renal and pulmonary disease. Procedure-specific factors further modulate the pre-existing risk factors and may add further complications during the procedure and in the postprocedural period. For example, in patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), specific complications such as spinal cord injury and stroke are the focus of intraprocedural neurophysiologic monitoring, because neurological deficits remain of the most devastating complications after peripheral endovascular interventions.

KW - Cerebrospinal fluid pressure monitoring

KW - Intraprocedural monitoring for endovascular procedures

KW - Monitoring during thoracic endovascular aortic repair

KW - Neurologic monitoring

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892245573&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892245573&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-1-4419-1387-6_6

DO - 10.1007/978-1-4419-1387-6_6

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84892245573

SN - 9781441913869

SP - 63

EP - 73

BT - Peripheral Endovascular Interventions

PB - Springer New York

ER -