Intraobserver repeatability of automated versus adjusted optical coherence tomography measurements in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration

Sinan Tatlipinar, Syed Mahmood Shah, Peter A. Campochiaro, Quan Dong Nguyen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: To assess the intraobserver repeatability of automated versusadjusted optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NVAMD). Methods: Ten eyes with NVAMD from 10 consecutive patients underwent two OCT measurements within 5 days by a single operator. Automated and adjusted central 1-mm foveal thickness and automated and adjusted total macular volume were measured in each study eye. The term 'adjusted' refers to manually corrected values, in which the interface landmarks for measurements are selected by the operator using Stratus® scan profiling and custom software. Bland-Altman method and bootstrap comparison of intraclass correlations (ICCs) were used for repeatability analysis. Results: Bland-Altman comparison did not reveal any statistically significant difference in any parameter, when results at first and second examination were compared (p > 0.05), indicating that the repeated measurements are similar. Further analysis was conducted using the bootstrap comparison of ICCs. The difference between adjusted and automated foveal thickness ICCs (r = 0.945 and 0.635, respectively) was significant (p = 0.031), indicating higher repeatability for adjusted foveal thickness. The ICCs for adjusted and automated total macular volume (r = 0.873 and 0.863, respectively) showed no statistically significant difference (p = 0.881). Conclusion: The repeatability of adjusted retinal thickness measurements, in which the errors of retinal boundary detection by OCT analysis software is corrected by the operator using scan profiling, is found to be higher than that of automated ones in this small group of NVAMD patients when performed by a single experienced operator.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)227-232
Number of pages6
JournalOphthalmologica
Volume221
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2007

Fingerprint

Optical Coherence Tomography
Macular Degeneration
Software

Keywords

  • Neovascular age-related macular degeneration
  • Optical coherence tomography
  • Repeatability, automated vs. adjusted optical coherence tomography measurements

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Intraobserver repeatability of automated versus adjusted optical coherence tomography measurements in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. / Tatlipinar, Sinan; Shah, Syed Mahmood; Campochiaro, Peter A.; Nguyen, Quan Dong.

In: Ophthalmologica, Vol. 221, No. 4, 01.06.2007, p. 227-232.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tatlipinar, Sinan ; Shah, Syed Mahmood ; Campochiaro, Peter A. ; Nguyen, Quan Dong. / Intraobserver repeatability of automated versus adjusted optical coherence tomography measurements in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. In: Ophthalmologica. 2007 ; Vol. 221, No. 4. pp. 227-232.
@article{a9b1e1afc76246faa8591a52bc5599bf,
title = "Intraobserver repeatability of automated versus adjusted optical coherence tomography measurements in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration",
abstract = "Aim: To assess the intraobserver repeatability of automated versusadjusted optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NVAMD). Methods: Ten eyes with NVAMD from 10 consecutive patients underwent two OCT measurements within 5 days by a single operator. Automated and adjusted central 1-mm foveal thickness and automated and adjusted total macular volume were measured in each study eye. The term 'adjusted' refers to manually corrected values, in which the interface landmarks for measurements are selected by the operator using Stratus{\circledR} scan profiling and custom software. Bland-Altman method and bootstrap comparison of intraclass correlations (ICCs) were used for repeatability analysis. Results: Bland-Altman comparison did not reveal any statistically significant difference in any parameter, when results at first and second examination were compared (p > 0.05), indicating that the repeated measurements are similar. Further analysis was conducted using the bootstrap comparison of ICCs. The difference between adjusted and automated foveal thickness ICCs (r = 0.945 and 0.635, respectively) was significant (p = 0.031), indicating higher repeatability for adjusted foveal thickness. The ICCs for adjusted and automated total macular volume (r = 0.873 and 0.863, respectively) showed no statistically significant difference (p = 0.881). Conclusion: The repeatability of adjusted retinal thickness measurements, in which the errors of retinal boundary detection by OCT analysis software is corrected by the operator using scan profiling, is found to be higher than that of automated ones in this small group of NVAMD patients when performed by a single experienced operator.",
keywords = "Neovascular age-related macular degeneration, Optical coherence tomography, Repeatability, automated vs. adjusted optical coherence tomography measurements",
author = "Sinan Tatlipinar and Shah, {Syed Mahmood} and Campochiaro, {Peter A.} and Nguyen, {Quan Dong}",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1159/000101923",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "221",
pages = "227--232",
journal = "Ophthalmologica",
issn = "0030-3755",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intraobserver repeatability of automated versus adjusted optical coherence tomography measurements in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration

AU - Tatlipinar, Sinan

AU - Shah, Syed Mahmood

AU - Campochiaro, Peter A.

AU - Nguyen, Quan Dong

PY - 2007/6/1

Y1 - 2007/6/1

N2 - Aim: To assess the intraobserver repeatability of automated versusadjusted optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NVAMD). Methods: Ten eyes with NVAMD from 10 consecutive patients underwent two OCT measurements within 5 days by a single operator. Automated and adjusted central 1-mm foveal thickness and automated and adjusted total macular volume were measured in each study eye. The term 'adjusted' refers to manually corrected values, in which the interface landmarks for measurements are selected by the operator using Stratus® scan profiling and custom software. Bland-Altman method and bootstrap comparison of intraclass correlations (ICCs) were used for repeatability analysis. Results: Bland-Altman comparison did not reveal any statistically significant difference in any parameter, when results at first and second examination were compared (p > 0.05), indicating that the repeated measurements are similar. Further analysis was conducted using the bootstrap comparison of ICCs. The difference between adjusted and automated foveal thickness ICCs (r = 0.945 and 0.635, respectively) was significant (p = 0.031), indicating higher repeatability for adjusted foveal thickness. The ICCs for adjusted and automated total macular volume (r = 0.873 and 0.863, respectively) showed no statistically significant difference (p = 0.881). Conclusion: The repeatability of adjusted retinal thickness measurements, in which the errors of retinal boundary detection by OCT analysis software is corrected by the operator using scan profiling, is found to be higher than that of automated ones in this small group of NVAMD patients when performed by a single experienced operator.

AB - Aim: To assess the intraobserver repeatability of automated versusadjusted optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NVAMD). Methods: Ten eyes with NVAMD from 10 consecutive patients underwent two OCT measurements within 5 days by a single operator. Automated and adjusted central 1-mm foveal thickness and automated and adjusted total macular volume were measured in each study eye. The term 'adjusted' refers to manually corrected values, in which the interface landmarks for measurements are selected by the operator using Stratus® scan profiling and custom software. Bland-Altman method and bootstrap comparison of intraclass correlations (ICCs) were used for repeatability analysis. Results: Bland-Altman comparison did not reveal any statistically significant difference in any parameter, when results at first and second examination were compared (p > 0.05), indicating that the repeated measurements are similar. Further analysis was conducted using the bootstrap comparison of ICCs. The difference between adjusted and automated foveal thickness ICCs (r = 0.945 and 0.635, respectively) was significant (p = 0.031), indicating higher repeatability for adjusted foveal thickness. The ICCs for adjusted and automated total macular volume (r = 0.873 and 0.863, respectively) showed no statistically significant difference (p = 0.881). Conclusion: The repeatability of adjusted retinal thickness measurements, in which the errors of retinal boundary detection by OCT analysis software is corrected by the operator using scan profiling, is found to be higher than that of automated ones in this small group of NVAMD patients when performed by a single experienced operator.

KW - Neovascular age-related macular degeneration

KW - Optical coherence tomography

KW - Repeatability, automated vs. adjusted optical coherence tomography measurements

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250777198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250777198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000101923

DO - 10.1159/000101923

M3 - Article

VL - 221

SP - 227

EP - 232

JO - Ophthalmologica

JF - Ophthalmologica

SN - 0030-3755

IS - 4

ER -