Interpretive biases for ambiguous stimuli in social anxiety

Joseph I. Constans, David L. Penn, Gail H. Ihen, Debra A Hope

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

104 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A growing body of literature suggests that individuals with high levels of general anxiety form threatening interpretations of ambiguous events. Although theoretical formulations of pathological social anxiety emphasize the importance of a negative interpretive-style in the etiology and maintenance of the disorder, we are unaware of any study that documents this presumed phenomenon. To address this issue, we assessed for possible interpretive biases in a group of high and low socially-anxious students. The results indicated that socially-anxious subjects showed more threatening interpretations of ambiguous, interpersonal events when compared to the low-anxious participants. However, this bias was marked not so much by an outright negative interpretation style, but rather by a failure of the socially-anxious subjects to show a positive interpretation as was evinced by the low-anxious individuals. These group differences in interpretive style appeared to be influenced by trait aspects of social anxiety rather than differences in current mood state. No group differences emerged in interpretations of events that involved non-personal stimuli suggesting there is content specificity in the interpretive biases associated with social-anxiety. Copyright (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)643-651
Number of pages9
JournalBehaviour Research and Therapy
Volume37
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 1999

Fingerprint

Anxiety
Maintenance
Students

Keywords

  • Social anxiety
  • Stimulus ambiguity
  • Stroop task
  • Threat

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Interpretive biases for ambiguous stimuli in social anxiety. / Constans, Joseph I.; Penn, David L.; Ihen, Gail H.; Hope, Debra A.

In: Behaviour Research and Therapy, Vol. 37, No. 7, 01.07.1999, p. 643-651.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Constans, Joseph I. ; Penn, David L. ; Ihen, Gail H. ; Hope, Debra A. / Interpretive biases for ambiguous stimuli in social anxiety. In: Behaviour Research and Therapy. 1999 ; Vol. 37, No. 7. pp. 643-651.
@article{685bf64cd4fb45fb97005aa2244d38bf,
title = "Interpretive biases for ambiguous stimuli in social anxiety",
abstract = "A growing body of literature suggests that individuals with high levels of general anxiety form threatening interpretations of ambiguous events. Although theoretical formulations of pathological social anxiety emphasize the importance of a negative interpretive-style in the etiology and maintenance of the disorder, we are unaware of any study that documents this presumed phenomenon. To address this issue, we assessed for possible interpretive biases in a group of high and low socially-anxious students. The results indicated that socially-anxious subjects showed more threatening interpretations of ambiguous, interpersonal events when compared to the low-anxious participants. However, this bias was marked not so much by an outright negative interpretation style, but rather by a failure of the socially-anxious subjects to show a positive interpretation as was evinced by the low-anxious individuals. These group differences in interpretive style appeared to be influenced by trait aspects of social anxiety rather than differences in current mood state. No group differences emerged in interpretations of events that involved non-personal stimuli suggesting there is content specificity in the interpretive biases associated with social-anxiety. Copyright (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd.",
keywords = "Social anxiety, Stimulus ambiguity, Stroop task, Threat",
author = "Constans, {Joseph I.} and Penn, {David L.} and Ihen, {Gail H.} and Hope, {Debra A}",
year = "1999",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0005-7967(98)00180-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "643--651",
journal = "Behaviour Research and Therapy",
issn = "0005-7967",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interpretive biases for ambiguous stimuli in social anxiety

AU - Constans, Joseph I.

AU - Penn, David L.

AU - Ihen, Gail H.

AU - Hope, Debra A

PY - 1999/7/1

Y1 - 1999/7/1

N2 - A growing body of literature suggests that individuals with high levels of general anxiety form threatening interpretations of ambiguous events. Although theoretical formulations of pathological social anxiety emphasize the importance of a negative interpretive-style in the etiology and maintenance of the disorder, we are unaware of any study that documents this presumed phenomenon. To address this issue, we assessed for possible interpretive biases in a group of high and low socially-anxious students. The results indicated that socially-anxious subjects showed more threatening interpretations of ambiguous, interpersonal events when compared to the low-anxious participants. However, this bias was marked not so much by an outright negative interpretation style, but rather by a failure of the socially-anxious subjects to show a positive interpretation as was evinced by the low-anxious individuals. These group differences in interpretive style appeared to be influenced by trait aspects of social anxiety rather than differences in current mood state. No group differences emerged in interpretations of events that involved non-personal stimuli suggesting there is content specificity in the interpretive biases associated with social-anxiety. Copyright (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd.

AB - A growing body of literature suggests that individuals with high levels of general anxiety form threatening interpretations of ambiguous events. Although theoretical formulations of pathological social anxiety emphasize the importance of a negative interpretive-style in the etiology and maintenance of the disorder, we are unaware of any study that documents this presumed phenomenon. To address this issue, we assessed for possible interpretive biases in a group of high and low socially-anxious students. The results indicated that socially-anxious subjects showed more threatening interpretations of ambiguous, interpersonal events when compared to the low-anxious participants. However, this bias was marked not so much by an outright negative interpretation style, but rather by a failure of the socially-anxious subjects to show a positive interpretation as was evinced by the low-anxious individuals. These group differences in interpretive style appeared to be influenced by trait aspects of social anxiety rather than differences in current mood state. No group differences emerged in interpretations of events that involved non-personal stimuli suggesting there is content specificity in the interpretive biases associated with social-anxiety. Copyright (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd.

KW - Social anxiety

KW - Stimulus ambiguity

KW - Stroop task

KW - Threat

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033012013&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033012013&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0005-7967(98)00180-6

DO - 10.1016/S0005-7967(98)00180-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 10402689

AN - SCOPUS:0033012013

VL - 37

SP - 643

EP - 651

JO - Behaviour Research and Therapy

JF - Behaviour Research and Therapy

SN - 0005-7967

IS - 7

ER -