Interorganizational networks: Using a theoretical model to predict effectiveness of rural health care delivery networks

Alice M. Schumaker

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Interorganizational health care delivery networks have potential for sustaining health services delivery in rural areas faced with economic and demographic challenges. Four Nebraska rural health care delivery networks (Albion-Ord, Blue River Valley, Rural Partners, Inc., and Western Nebraska) were compared to an interorganizational model based on theories of interorganizational relations, exchange, population ecology, and synthesized collaboration. It assumes that outcomes, including effectiveness, are influenced by external and internal factors that are operationalized through external control, technology, structure, and operational process variables. Data were collected by a non-random, two-level cluster mail survey of network members (45/59 = 76.3% response rate). All networks received technical assistance from the Nebraska Office of Rural Health. Networks have formal organization, strategic plans, and official coordinators. Hospital administrators hold most leadership positions; few doctors or citizens are involved. Correlation and multiple regression analysis show partial fit between the research model and study networks. Effectiveness, measure by the gap between best possible and actual practice, increased with network connectivity (r=.36, p<.05), group methods of administrative decision-making (r=.52, p<.001) and sequential pattern of service delivery (r=.39, p<.05). Greater dependence on vertical funding corresponds to greater external control (r=.43, p<.01). The prediction that, as scope narrows, task intensity (r=.56, p<.001), duration (r=.41, p<.01), and task volume (r=.50, p<.01) increase is upheld. Centrality and network size decrease together (r=.43, p<.01) where there is little reliance on vertical sources of funds (r=.36, p<.05). The integrated interorganizational model demonstrates some efficacy for testing potential effectiveness of networks.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)371-406
Number of pages36
JournalJournal of Health and Human Services Administration
Volume25
Issue number3
StatePublished - Dec 1 2002

Fingerprint

Rural Health
Theoretical Models
Delivery of Health Care
Hospital Administrators
Postal Service
Financial Management
Ecology
Rivers
Health Services
Decision Making
Regression Analysis
Economics
Demography
Organizations
Technology
Research
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Leadership and Management
  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Interorganizational networks : Using a theoretical model to predict effectiveness of rural health care delivery networks. / Schumaker, Alice M.

In: Journal of Health and Human Services Administration, Vol. 25, No. 3, 01.12.2002, p. 371-406.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{23c864a5638c4838afd52321c8e0c919,
title = "Interorganizational networks: Using a theoretical model to predict effectiveness of rural health care delivery networks",
abstract = "Interorganizational health care delivery networks have potential for sustaining health services delivery in rural areas faced with economic and demographic challenges. Four Nebraska rural health care delivery networks (Albion-Ord, Blue River Valley, Rural Partners, Inc., and Western Nebraska) were compared to an interorganizational model based on theories of interorganizational relations, exchange, population ecology, and synthesized collaboration. It assumes that outcomes, including effectiveness, are influenced by external and internal factors that are operationalized through external control, technology, structure, and operational process variables. Data were collected by a non-random, two-level cluster mail survey of network members (45/59 = 76.3{\%} response rate). All networks received technical assistance from the Nebraska Office of Rural Health. Networks have formal organization, strategic plans, and official coordinators. Hospital administrators hold most leadership positions; few doctors or citizens are involved. Correlation and multiple regression analysis show partial fit between the research model and study networks. Effectiveness, measure by the gap between best possible and actual practice, increased with network connectivity (r=.36, p<.05), group methods of administrative decision-making (r=.52, p<.001) and sequential pattern of service delivery (r=.39, p<.05). Greater dependence on vertical funding corresponds to greater external control (r=.43, p<.01). The prediction that, as scope narrows, task intensity (r=.56, p<.001), duration (r=.41, p<.01), and task volume (r=.50, p<.01) increase is upheld. Centrality and network size decrease together (r=.43, p<.01) where there is little reliance on vertical sources of funds (r=.36, p<.05). The integrated interorganizational model demonstrates some efficacy for testing potential effectiveness of networks.",
author = "Schumaker, {Alice M.}",
year = "2002",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "371--406",
journal = "Journal of Health and Human Services Administration",
issn = "1079-3739",
publisher = "Southern Public Administration Education Foundation Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interorganizational networks

T2 - Using a theoretical model to predict effectiveness of rural health care delivery networks

AU - Schumaker, Alice M.

PY - 2002/12/1

Y1 - 2002/12/1

N2 - Interorganizational health care delivery networks have potential for sustaining health services delivery in rural areas faced with economic and demographic challenges. Four Nebraska rural health care delivery networks (Albion-Ord, Blue River Valley, Rural Partners, Inc., and Western Nebraska) were compared to an interorganizational model based on theories of interorganizational relations, exchange, population ecology, and synthesized collaboration. It assumes that outcomes, including effectiveness, are influenced by external and internal factors that are operationalized through external control, technology, structure, and operational process variables. Data were collected by a non-random, two-level cluster mail survey of network members (45/59 = 76.3% response rate). All networks received technical assistance from the Nebraska Office of Rural Health. Networks have formal organization, strategic plans, and official coordinators. Hospital administrators hold most leadership positions; few doctors or citizens are involved. Correlation and multiple regression analysis show partial fit between the research model and study networks. Effectiveness, measure by the gap between best possible and actual practice, increased with network connectivity (r=.36, p<.05), group methods of administrative decision-making (r=.52, p<.001) and sequential pattern of service delivery (r=.39, p<.05). Greater dependence on vertical funding corresponds to greater external control (r=.43, p<.01). The prediction that, as scope narrows, task intensity (r=.56, p<.001), duration (r=.41, p<.01), and task volume (r=.50, p<.01) increase is upheld. Centrality and network size decrease together (r=.43, p<.01) where there is little reliance on vertical sources of funds (r=.36, p<.05). The integrated interorganizational model demonstrates some efficacy for testing potential effectiveness of networks.

AB - Interorganizational health care delivery networks have potential for sustaining health services delivery in rural areas faced with economic and demographic challenges. Four Nebraska rural health care delivery networks (Albion-Ord, Blue River Valley, Rural Partners, Inc., and Western Nebraska) were compared to an interorganizational model based on theories of interorganizational relations, exchange, population ecology, and synthesized collaboration. It assumes that outcomes, including effectiveness, are influenced by external and internal factors that are operationalized through external control, technology, structure, and operational process variables. Data were collected by a non-random, two-level cluster mail survey of network members (45/59 = 76.3% response rate). All networks received technical assistance from the Nebraska Office of Rural Health. Networks have formal organization, strategic plans, and official coordinators. Hospital administrators hold most leadership positions; few doctors or citizens are involved. Correlation and multiple regression analysis show partial fit between the research model and study networks. Effectiveness, measure by the gap between best possible and actual practice, increased with network connectivity (r=.36, p<.05), group methods of administrative decision-making (r=.52, p<.001) and sequential pattern of service delivery (r=.39, p<.05). Greater dependence on vertical funding corresponds to greater external control (r=.43, p<.01). The prediction that, as scope narrows, task intensity (r=.56, p<.001), duration (r=.41, p<.01), and task volume (r=.50, p<.01) increase is upheld. Centrality and network size decrease together (r=.43, p<.01) where there is little reliance on vertical sources of funds (r=.36, p<.05). The integrated interorganizational model demonstrates some efficacy for testing potential effectiveness of networks.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2542446314&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2542446314&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

C2 - 15189000

AN - SCOPUS:2542446314

VL - 25

SP - 371

EP - 406

JO - Journal of Health and Human Services Administration

JF - Journal of Health and Human Services Administration

SN - 1079-3739

IS - 3

ER -