Internal Consistency and Cross-Informant Agreement of the Lithuanian-Translated Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale

Erkko T. Sointu, Renata Geležinienė, Matthew C. Lambert, Philip D. Nordness

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Educational professionals need assessments that yield psychometrically sound scores to assess students’ behavioral and emotional functioning in order to guide data-driven decision-making processes. Rating scales have been found to be effective and economical, and often multiple informant perspectives can be obtained. The agreement between multiple informants is often studied with deficit-based behavioral assessment tools; however, agreement is less well studied with strength-based behavioral assessments. In addition, when assessment instruments are translated for a new culture, the psychometric properties of assessment scores needs to be reexamined. The purpose of this study was to investigate the internal consistency and the cross-informant agreement of the Lithuanian-translated Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale to determine the initial basic psychometrics of the scores using a sample of 334 Lithuanian students. The results indicate that teacher ratings are acceptably reliable for use in research and practical settings such as schools; however, student ratings are less reliable and we caution against the use of their ratings in school-related decision-making processes. Agreement between teachers and students was moderate and higher than agreement found for deficit-based behavioral measures. Both internal consistency and cross-informant agreement was found to be similar across students both at risk and not at risk of behavioral or learning difficulties.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)135-141
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of School and Educational Psychology
Volume3
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 3 2015

Fingerprint

rating scale
Students
Needs Assessment
Psychometrics
student
psychometrics
decision-making process
Decision Making
deficit
rating
teacher rating
learning disorder
school
Behavior Rating Scale
Learning
teacher
Research

Keywords

  • BERS-2
  • Behavioral assessment
  • cross-informant agreement
  • psychometrics
  • strength-based assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Internal Consistency and Cross-Informant Agreement of the Lithuanian-Translated Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale. / Sointu, Erkko T.; Geležinienė, Renata; Lambert, Matthew C.; Nordness, Philip D.

In: International Journal of School and Educational Psychology, Vol. 3, No. 2, 03.04.2015, p. 135-141.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f5035a6ce6634e43991bebc52aec7823,
title = "Internal Consistency and Cross-Informant Agreement of the Lithuanian-Translated Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale",
abstract = "Educational professionals need assessments that yield psychometrically sound scores to assess students’ behavioral and emotional functioning in order to guide data-driven decision-making processes. Rating scales have been found to be effective and economical, and often multiple informant perspectives can be obtained. The agreement between multiple informants is often studied with deficit-based behavioral assessment tools; however, agreement is less well studied with strength-based behavioral assessments. In addition, when assessment instruments are translated for a new culture, the psychometric properties of assessment scores needs to be reexamined. The purpose of this study was to investigate the internal consistency and the cross-informant agreement of the Lithuanian-translated Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale to determine the initial basic psychometrics of the scores using a sample of 334 Lithuanian students. The results indicate that teacher ratings are acceptably reliable for use in research and practical settings such as schools; however, student ratings are less reliable and we caution against the use of their ratings in school-related decision-making processes. Agreement between teachers and students was moderate and higher than agreement found for deficit-based behavioral measures. Both internal consistency and cross-informant agreement was found to be similar across students both at risk and not at risk of behavioral or learning difficulties.",
keywords = "BERS-2, Behavioral assessment, cross-informant agreement, psychometrics, strength-based assessment",
author = "Sointu, {Erkko T.} and Renata Geležinienė and Lambert, {Matthew C.} and Nordness, {Philip D.}",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/21683603.2015.1037975",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "135--141",
journal = "International Journal of School and Educational Psychology",
issn = "2168-3603",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Internal Consistency and Cross-Informant Agreement of the Lithuanian-Translated Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale

AU - Sointu, Erkko T.

AU - Geležinienė, Renata

AU - Lambert, Matthew C.

AU - Nordness, Philip D.

PY - 2015/4/3

Y1 - 2015/4/3

N2 - Educational professionals need assessments that yield psychometrically sound scores to assess students’ behavioral and emotional functioning in order to guide data-driven decision-making processes. Rating scales have been found to be effective and economical, and often multiple informant perspectives can be obtained. The agreement between multiple informants is often studied with deficit-based behavioral assessment tools; however, agreement is less well studied with strength-based behavioral assessments. In addition, when assessment instruments are translated for a new culture, the psychometric properties of assessment scores needs to be reexamined. The purpose of this study was to investigate the internal consistency and the cross-informant agreement of the Lithuanian-translated Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale to determine the initial basic psychometrics of the scores using a sample of 334 Lithuanian students. The results indicate that teacher ratings are acceptably reliable for use in research and practical settings such as schools; however, student ratings are less reliable and we caution against the use of their ratings in school-related decision-making processes. Agreement between teachers and students was moderate and higher than agreement found for deficit-based behavioral measures. Both internal consistency and cross-informant agreement was found to be similar across students both at risk and not at risk of behavioral or learning difficulties.

AB - Educational professionals need assessments that yield psychometrically sound scores to assess students’ behavioral and emotional functioning in order to guide data-driven decision-making processes. Rating scales have been found to be effective and economical, and often multiple informant perspectives can be obtained. The agreement between multiple informants is often studied with deficit-based behavioral assessment tools; however, agreement is less well studied with strength-based behavioral assessments. In addition, when assessment instruments are translated for a new culture, the psychometric properties of assessment scores needs to be reexamined. The purpose of this study was to investigate the internal consistency and the cross-informant agreement of the Lithuanian-translated Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale to determine the initial basic psychometrics of the scores using a sample of 334 Lithuanian students. The results indicate that teacher ratings are acceptably reliable for use in research and practical settings such as schools; however, student ratings are less reliable and we caution against the use of their ratings in school-related decision-making processes. Agreement between teachers and students was moderate and higher than agreement found for deficit-based behavioral measures. Both internal consistency and cross-informant agreement was found to be similar across students both at risk and not at risk of behavioral or learning difficulties.

KW - BERS-2

KW - Behavioral assessment

KW - cross-informant agreement

KW - psychometrics

KW - strength-based assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051717945&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051717945&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/21683603.2015.1037975

DO - 10.1080/21683603.2015.1037975

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85051717945

VL - 3

SP - 135

EP - 141

JO - International Journal of School and Educational Psychology

JF - International Journal of School and Educational Psychology

SN - 2168-3603

IS - 2

ER -