Intensity discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level

Walt Jesteadt, Craig C. Wier, David M. Green

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

248 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Intensity discrimination was measured for pulsed sinusoids of various frequencies (200–8000 Hz) and sensation levels (5–80 dB). The data for all frequencies were fitted by a single function, <I/I =0.463 (I/I0)-0.072, where I0 is intensity at threshold, I is the intensity of the tone, and A / is the increment needed to obtain 71% correct in a two-interval forced-choice adaptive procedure. The form of this function is in good agreement with data reported in comparable studies but differs markedly from the data reported by Riesz [Phys. Rev. 31, 867–875 (1928)]. An analysis of the actual values of I/I reported in the other studies indicates a range larger than would be predicted on the basis of individual differences among observers in this study. The data are also discussed in terms of the predictions of current theoretical models.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)169-177
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume61
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1977

Fingerprint

discrimination
sine waves
intervals
thresholds
predictions
Discrimination
Prediction
Observer
Individual Differences

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Cite this

Intensity discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level. / Jesteadt, Walt; Wier, Craig C.; Green, David M.

In: Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 61, No. 1, 01.1977, p. 169-177.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{efb77055c87840f29580f4fd5b64f711,
title = "Intensity discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level",
abstract = "Intensity discrimination was measured for pulsed sinusoids of various frequencies (200–8000 Hz) and sensation levels (5–80 dB). The data for all frequencies were fitted by a single function, <I/I =0.463 (I/I0)-0.072, where I0 is intensity at threshold, I is the intensity of the tone, and A / is the increment needed to obtain 71{\%} correct in a two-interval forced-choice adaptive procedure. The form of this function is in good agreement with data reported in comparable studies but differs markedly from the data reported by Riesz [Phys. Rev. 31, 867–875 (1928)]. An analysis of the actual values of I/I reported in the other studies indicates a range larger than would be predicted on the basis of individual differences among observers in this study. The data are also discussed in terms of the predictions of current theoretical models.",
author = "Walt Jesteadt and Wier, {Craig C.} and Green, {David M.}",
year = "1977",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1121/1.381278",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "61",
pages = "169--177",
journal = "Journal of the Acoustical Society of America",
issn = "0001-4966",
publisher = "Acoustical Society of America",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intensity discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level

AU - Jesteadt, Walt

AU - Wier, Craig C.

AU - Green, David M.

PY - 1977/1

Y1 - 1977/1

N2 - Intensity discrimination was measured for pulsed sinusoids of various frequencies (200–8000 Hz) and sensation levels (5–80 dB). The data for all frequencies were fitted by a single function, <I/I =0.463 (I/I0)-0.072, where I0 is intensity at threshold, I is the intensity of the tone, and A / is the increment needed to obtain 71% correct in a two-interval forced-choice adaptive procedure. The form of this function is in good agreement with data reported in comparable studies but differs markedly from the data reported by Riesz [Phys. Rev. 31, 867–875 (1928)]. An analysis of the actual values of I/I reported in the other studies indicates a range larger than would be predicted on the basis of individual differences among observers in this study. The data are also discussed in terms of the predictions of current theoretical models.

AB - Intensity discrimination was measured for pulsed sinusoids of various frequencies (200–8000 Hz) and sensation levels (5–80 dB). The data for all frequencies were fitted by a single function, <I/I =0.463 (I/I0)-0.072, where I0 is intensity at threshold, I is the intensity of the tone, and A / is the increment needed to obtain 71% correct in a two-interval forced-choice adaptive procedure. The form of this function is in good agreement with data reported in comparable studies but differs markedly from the data reported by Riesz [Phys. Rev. 31, 867–875 (1928)]. An analysis of the actual values of I/I reported in the other studies indicates a range larger than would be predicted on the basis of individual differences among observers in this study. The data are also discussed in terms of the predictions of current theoretical models.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0017362869&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0017362869&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1121/1.381278

DO - 10.1121/1.381278

M3 - Article

C2 - 833368

AN - SCOPUS:0017362869

VL - 61

SP - 169

EP - 177

JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

SN - 0001-4966

IS - 1

ER -