Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays

Timothy C. Guetterman, Michael D. Fetters, John W Creswell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

84 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE Mixed methods research is becoming an important methodology to investigate complex health-related topics, yet the meaningful integration of qualitative and quantitative data remains elusive and needs further development. A promising innovation to facilitate integration is the use of visual joint displays that bring data together visually to draw out new insights. The purpose of this study was to identify exemplar joint displays by analyzing the various types of joint displays being used in published articles. METHODS We searched for empirical articles that included joint displays in 3 journals that publish state-of-the-art mixed methods research. We analyzed each of 19 identified joint displays to extract the type of display, mixed methods design, purpose, rationale, qualitative and quantitative data sources, integration approaches, and analytic strategies. Our analysis focused on what each display communicated and its representation of mixed methods analysis. RESULTS The most prevalent types of joint displays were statistics-by-themes and side-by-side comparisons. Innovative joint displays connected findings to theoretical frameworks or recommendations. Researchers used joint displays for convergent, explanatory sequential, exploratory sequential, and intervention designs. We identified exemplars for each of these designs by analyzing the inferences gained through using the joint display. Exemplars represented mixed methods integration, presented integrated results, and yielded new insights. CONCLUSIONS Joint displays appear to provide a structure to discuss the integrated analysis and assist both researchers and readers in understanding how mixed methods provides new insights. We encourage researchers to use joint displays to integrate and represent mixed methods analysis and discuss their value.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)554-561
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of Family Medicine
Volume13
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Joints
Health
Research
Research Personnel
Data Display
Information Storage and Retrieval

Keywords

  • Data display
  • Integrative analysis
  • Methodology
  • Multimethod research
  • Qualitative
  • Quantitative
  • Study design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Family Practice

Cite this

Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays. / Guetterman, Timothy C.; Fetters, Michael D.; Creswell, John W.

In: Annals of Family Medicine, Vol. 13, No. 6, 2015, p. 554-561.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{15dffd9c5b3841e9b413fb99bb8c10c4,
title = "Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays",
abstract = "PURPOSE Mixed methods research is becoming an important methodology to investigate complex health-related topics, yet the meaningful integration of qualitative and quantitative data remains elusive and needs further development. A promising innovation to facilitate integration is the use of visual joint displays that bring data together visually to draw out new insights. The purpose of this study was to identify exemplar joint displays by analyzing the various types of joint displays being used in published articles. METHODS We searched for empirical articles that included joint displays in 3 journals that publish state-of-the-art mixed methods research. We analyzed each of 19 identified joint displays to extract the type of display, mixed methods design, purpose, rationale, qualitative and quantitative data sources, integration approaches, and analytic strategies. Our analysis focused on what each display communicated and its representation of mixed methods analysis. RESULTS The most prevalent types of joint displays were statistics-by-themes and side-by-side comparisons. Innovative joint displays connected findings to theoretical frameworks or recommendations. Researchers used joint displays for convergent, explanatory sequential, exploratory sequential, and intervention designs. We identified exemplars for each of these designs by analyzing the inferences gained through using the joint display. Exemplars represented mixed methods integration, presented integrated results, and yielded new insights. CONCLUSIONS Joint displays appear to provide a structure to discuss the integrated analysis and assist both researchers and readers in understanding how mixed methods provides new insights. We encourage researchers to use joint displays to integrate and represent mixed methods analysis and discuss their value.",
keywords = "Data display, Integrative analysis, Methodology, Multimethod research, Qualitative, Quantitative, Study design",
author = "Guetterman, {Timothy C.} and Fetters, {Michael D.} and Creswell, {John W}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1370/afm.1865",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "554--561",
journal = "Annals of Family Medicine",
issn = "1544-1709",
publisher = "Annals of Family Medicine, Inc",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays

AU - Guetterman, Timothy C.

AU - Fetters, Michael D.

AU - Creswell, John W

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - PURPOSE Mixed methods research is becoming an important methodology to investigate complex health-related topics, yet the meaningful integration of qualitative and quantitative data remains elusive and needs further development. A promising innovation to facilitate integration is the use of visual joint displays that bring data together visually to draw out new insights. The purpose of this study was to identify exemplar joint displays by analyzing the various types of joint displays being used in published articles. METHODS We searched for empirical articles that included joint displays in 3 journals that publish state-of-the-art mixed methods research. We analyzed each of 19 identified joint displays to extract the type of display, mixed methods design, purpose, rationale, qualitative and quantitative data sources, integration approaches, and analytic strategies. Our analysis focused on what each display communicated and its representation of mixed methods analysis. RESULTS The most prevalent types of joint displays were statistics-by-themes and side-by-side comparisons. Innovative joint displays connected findings to theoretical frameworks or recommendations. Researchers used joint displays for convergent, explanatory sequential, exploratory sequential, and intervention designs. We identified exemplars for each of these designs by analyzing the inferences gained through using the joint display. Exemplars represented mixed methods integration, presented integrated results, and yielded new insights. CONCLUSIONS Joint displays appear to provide a structure to discuss the integrated analysis and assist both researchers and readers in understanding how mixed methods provides new insights. We encourage researchers to use joint displays to integrate and represent mixed methods analysis and discuss their value.

AB - PURPOSE Mixed methods research is becoming an important methodology to investigate complex health-related topics, yet the meaningful integration of qualitative and quantitative data remains elusive and needs further development. A promising innovation to facilitate integration is the use of visual joint displays that bring data together visually to draw out new insights. The purpose of this study was to identify exemplar joint displays by analyzing the various types of joint displays being used in published articles. METHODS We searched for empirical articles that included joint displays in 3 journals that publish state-of-the-art mixed methods research. We analyzed each of 19 identified joint displays to extract the type of display, mixed methods design, purpose, rationale, qualitative and quantitative data sources, integration approaches, and analytic strategies. Our analysis focused on what each display communicated and its representation of mixed methods analysis. RESULTS The most prevalent types of joint displays were statistics-by-themes and side-by-side comparisons. Innovative joint displays connected findings to theoretical frameworks or recommendations. Researchers used joint displays for convergent, explanatory sequential, exploratory sequential, and intervention designs. We identified exemplars for each of these designs by analyzing the inferences gained through using the joint display. Exemplars represented mixed methods integration, presented integrated results, and yielded new insights. CONCLUSIONS Joint displays appear to provide a structure to discuss the integrated analysis and assist both researchers and readers in understanding how mixed methods provides new insights. We encourage researchers to use joint displays to integrate and represent mixed methods analysis and discuss their value.

KW - Data display

KW - Integrative analysis

KW - Methodology

KW - Multimethod research

KW - Qualitative

KW - Quantitative

KW - Study design

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84946919072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84946919072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1370/afm.1865

DO - 10.1370/afm.1865

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 554

EP - 561

JO - Annals of Family Medicine

JF - Annals of Family Medicine

SN - 1544-1709

IS - 6

ER -