Inhibition of return with rapid serial shifts of attention: Implications for memory and visual search

Michael D. Dodd, Alan D. Castel, Jay Pratt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Horowitz and Wolfe (2001) suggested that inhibition of return (IOR) should not be observed in tasks that involve rapid deployments of attention. To examine this issue, five of six possible locations were sequentially cued with either short-duration peripheral cues (50 msec) or long-duration peripheral cues (500 msec). As was expected, IOR was observed in the first two experiments at every cued location with the long-duration cues, with the magnitude of IOR decreasing for earlier cued locations relative to later cued locations. In the short-cue condition, IOR was observed at only one cued location (the second to last). The pattern of results for the short-duration cues was found regardless of whether the fixation cue was of a short (Experiment 1) or a long (Experiment 2) duration. In Experiment 3, the final fixation cue was removed, and IOR was again observed at virtually all locations in both the short- and the long-cue conditions. These findings indicate that IOR can be observed at multiple locations when attention is shifted rapidly between locations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1126-1135
Number of pages10
JournalPerception and Psychophysics
Volume65
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2003

Fingerprint

Cues
experiment
Inhibition (Psychology)
Inhibition of Return
Visual Search
Experiment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Inhibition of return with rapid serial shifts of attention : Implications for memory and visual search. / Dodd, Michael D.; Castel, Alan D.; Pratt, Jay.

In: Perception and Psychophysics, Vol. 65, No. 7, 10.2003, p. 1126-1135.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0530b4f8debc4af4b97b38a8016f7485,
title = "Inhibition of return with rapid serial shifts of attention: Implications for memory and visual search",
abstract = "Horowitz and Wolfe (2001) suggested that inhibition of return (IOR) should not be observed in tasks that involve rapid deployments of attention. To examine this issue, five of six possible locations were sequentially cued with either short-duration peripheral cues (50 msec) or long-duration peripheral cues (500 msec). As was expected, IOR was observed in the first two experiments at every cued location with the long-duration cues, with the magnitude of IOR decreasing for earlier cued locations relative to later cued locations. In the short-cue condition, IOR was observed at only one cued location (the second to last). The pattern of results for the short-duration cues was found regardless of whether the fixation cue was of a short (Experiment 1) or a long (Experiment 2) duration. In Experiment 3, the final fixation cue was removed, and IOR was again observed at virtually all locations in both the short- and the long-cue conditions. These findings indicate that IOR can be observed at multiple locations when attention is shifted rapidly between locations.",
author = "Dodd, {Michael D.} and Castel, {Alan D.} and Jay Pratt",
year = "2003",
month = "10",
doi = "10.3758/BF03194839",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "65",
pages = "1126--1135",
journal = "Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics",
issn = "1943-3921",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inhibition of return with rapid serial shifts of attention

T2 - Implications for memory and visual search

AU - Dodd, Michael D.

AU - Castel, Alan D.

AU - Pratt, Jay

PY - 2003/10

Y1 - 2003/10

N2 - Horowitz and Wolfe (2001) suggested that inhibition of return (IOR) should not be observed in tasks that involve rapid deployments of attention. To examine this issue, five of six possible locations were sequentially cued with either short-duration peripheral cues (50 msec) or long-duration peripheral cues (500 msec). As was expected, IOR was observed in the first two experiments at every cued location with the long-duration cues, with the magnitude of IOR decreasing for earlier cued locations relative to later cued locations. In the short-cue condition, IOR was observed at only one cued location (the second to last). The pattern of results for the short-duration cues was found regardless of whether the fixation cue was of a short (Experiment 1) or a long (Experiment 2) duration. In Experiment 3, the final fixation cue was removed, and IOR was again observed at virtually all locations in both the short- and the long-cue conditions. These findings indicate that IOR can be observed at multiple locations when attention is shifted rapidly between locations.

AB - Horowitz and Wolfe (2001) suggested that inhibition of return (IOR) should not be observed in tasks that involve rapid deployments of attention. To examine this issue, five of six possible locations were sequentially cued with either short-duration peripheral cues (50 msec) or long-duration peripheral cues (500 msec). As was expected, IOR was observed in the first two experiments at every cued location with the long-duration cues, with the magnitude of IOR decreasing for earlier cued locations relative to later cued locations. In the short-cue condition, IOR was observed at only one cued location (the second to last). The pattern of results for the short-duration cues was found regardless of whether the fixation cue was of a short (Experiment 1) or a long (Experiment 2) duration. In Experiment 3, the final fixation cue was removed, and IOR was again observed at virtually all locations in both the short- and the long-cue conditions. These findings indicate that IOR can be observed at multiple locations when attention is shifted rapidly between locations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0348221956&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0348221956&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BF03194839

DO - 10.3758/BF03194839

M3 - Article

C2 - 14674638

AN - SCOPUS:0348221956

VL - 65

SP - 1126

EP - 1135

JO - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

JF - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

SN - 1943-3921

IS - 7

ER -