Informative retesting

Christopher R Bilder, Joshua M. Tebbs, Peng Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In situations where individuals are screened for an infectious disease or other binary characteristic and where resources for testing are limited, group testing can offer substantial benefits. Group testing, where subjects are tested in groups (pools) initially, has been successfully applied to problems in blood bank screening, public health, drug discovery, genetics, and many other areas. In these applications, often the goal is to identify each individual as positive or negative using initial group tests and subsequent retests of individuals within positive groups. Many group testing identification procedures have been proposed; however, the vast majority of them fail to incorporate heterogeneity among the individuals being screened. In this paper, we present a new approach to identify positive individuals when covariate information is available on each. This covariate information is used to structure how retesting is implemented within positive groups; therefore, we call this new approach "informative retesting." We derive closed-form expressions and implementation algorithms for the probability mass functions for the number of tests needed to decode positive groups. These informative retesting procedures are illustrated through a number of examples and are applied to chlamydia and gonorrhea testing in Nebraska for the Infertility Prevention Project. Overall, our work shows compelling evidence that informative retesting can dramatically decrease the number of tests while providing accuracy similar to established noninformative retesting procedures. This article has supplementary material online.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)942-955
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of the American Statistical Association
Volume105
Issue number491
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2010

Fingerprint

Group Testing
Covariates
Infertility
Testing
Drug Discovery
Decode
Infectious Diseases
Public Health
Screening
Blood
Closed-form
Binary
Decrease
Resources

Keywords

  • Binary response
  • Chlamydia
  • Gonorrhea
  • Group testing
  • Identification
  • Pooled testing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty

Cite this

Informative retesting. / Bilder, Christopher R; Tebbs, Joshua M.; Chen, Peng.

In: Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 105, No. 491, 01.09.2010, p. 942-955.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bilder, Christopher R ; Tebbs, Joshua M. ; Chen, Peng. / Informative retesting. In: Journal of the American Statistical Association. 2010 ; Vol. 105, No. 491. pp. 942-955.
@article{c824d3e98753432991bae08f87daa30f,
title = "Informative retesting",
abstract = "In situations where individuals are screened for an infectious disease or other binary characteristic and where resources for testing are limited, group testing can offer substantial benefits. Group testing, where subjects are tested in groups (pools) initially, has been successfully applied to problems in blood bank screening, public health, drug discovery, genetics, and many other areas. In these applications, often the goal is to identify each individual as positive or negative using initial group tests and subsequent retests of individuals within positive groups. Many group testing identification procedures have been proposed; however, the vast majority of them fail to incorporate heterogeneity among the individuals being screened. In this paper, we present a new approach to identify positive individuals when covariate information is available on each. This covariate information is used to structure how retesting is implemented within positive groups; therefore, we call this new approach {"}informative retesting.{"} We derive closed-form expressions and implementation algorithms for the probability mass functions for the number of tests needed to decode positive groups. These informative retesting procedures are illustrated through a number of examples and are applied to chlamydia and gonorrhea testing in Nebraska for the Infertility Prevention Project. Overall, our work shows compelling evidence that informative retesting can dramatically decrease the number of tests while providing accuracy similar to established noninformative retesting procedures. This article has supplementary material online.",
keywords = "Binary response, Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, Group testing, Identification, Pooled testing",
author = "Bilder, {Christopher R} and Tebbs, {Joshua M.} and Peng Chen",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1198/jasa.2010.ap09231",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "105",
pages = "942--955",
journal = "Journal of the American Statistical Association",
issn = "0162-1459",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "491",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Informative retesting

AU - Bilder, Christopher R

AU - Tebbs, Joshua M.

AU - Chen, Peng

PY - 2010/9/1

Y1 - 2010/9/1

N2 - In situations where individuals are screened for an infectious disease or other binary characteristic and where resources for testing are limited, group testing can offer substantial benefits. Group testing, where subjects are tested in groups (pools) initially, has been successfully applied to problems in blood bank screening, public health, drug discovery, genetics, and many other areas. In these applications, often the goal is to identify each individual as positive or negative using initial group tests and subsequent retests of individuals within positive groups. Many group testing identification procedures have been proposed; however, the vast majority of them fail to incorporate heterogeneity among the individuals being screened. In this paper, we present a new approach to identify positive individuals when covariate information is available on each. This covariate information is used to structure how retesting is implemented within positive groups; therefore, we call this new approach "informative retesting." We derive closed-form expressions and implementation algorithms for the probability mass functions for the number of tests needed to decode positive groups. These informative retesting procedures are illustrated through a number of examples and are applied to chlamydia and gonorrhea testing in Nebraska for the Infertility Prevention Project. Overall, our work shows compelling evidence that informative retesting can dramatically decrease the number of tests while providing accuracy similar to established noninformative retesting procedures. This article has supplementary material online.

AB - In situations where individuals are screened for an infectious disease or other binary characteristic and where resources for testing are limited, group testing can offer substantial benefits. Group testing, where subjects are tested in groups (pools) initially, has been successfully applied to problems in blood bank screening, public health, drug discovery, genetics, and many other areas. In these applications, often the goal is to identify each individual as positive or negative using initial group tests and subsequent retests of individuals within positive groups. Many group testing identification procedures have been proposed; however, the vast majority of them fail to incorporate heterogeneity among the individuals being screened. In this paper, we present a new approach to identify positive individuals when covariate information is available on each. This covariate information is used to structure how retesting is implemented within positive groups; therefore, we call this new approach "informative retesting." We derive closed-form expressions and implementation algorithms for the probability mass functions for the number of tests needed to decode positive groups. These informative retesting procedures are illustrated through a number of examples and are applied to chlamydia and gonorrhea testing in Nebraska for the Infertility Prevention Project. Overall, our work shows compelling evidence that informative retesting can dramatically decrease the number of tests while providing accuracy similar to established noninformative retesting procedures. This article has supplementary material online.

KW - Binary response

KW - Chlamydia

KW - Gonorrhea

KW - Group testing

KW - Identification

KW - Pooled testing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649397736&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649397736&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1198/jasa.2010.ap09231

DO - 10.1198/jasa.2010.ap09231

M3 - Article

VL - 105

SP - 942

EP - 955

JO - Journal of the American Statistical Association

JF - Journal of the American Statistical Association

SN - 0162-1459

IS - 491

ER -