Influences on practitioner treatment selection: Best research evidence and other considerations

Timothy D. Nelson, Ric G. Steele

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The recent movement toward evidence-based practice in mental health services has highlighted the importance of research evidence in treatment decisions. However, the fact that many treatments with strong research support are not widely used in clinical settings suggests that practitioners' decisions are not based on research alone but rather are influenced by other considerations. This study examines the relative importance of various considerations on practitioner treatment selection using a national survey of mental health practitioners including doctoral-level psychologists, master's-level psychologists, and master's-level clinical social workers (N=206). Results indicate that practitioners are influenced by a range of considerations including empirical evidence from applied field studies, the perceived flexibility of a treatment, and the appeal of a treatment to colleagues and clients. These findings are discussed within the context of efforts to design, evaluate, and disseminate treatments with research support into clinical settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)170-178
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Behavioral Health Services and Research
Volume35
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2008

Fingerprint

Research
psychologist
evidence
mental health
Therapeutics
Psychology
social worker
appeal
health service
flexibility
Evidence-Based Practice
Mental Health Services
Mental Health

Keywords

  • Consumer satisfaction
  • Flexibility
  • Practitioner preferences
  • Provider satisfaction
  • Treatment selection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Influences on practitioner treatment selection : Best research evidence and other considerations. / Nelson, Timothy D.; Steele, Ric G.

In: Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research, Vol. 35, No. 2, 01.04.2008, p. 170-178.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a2dedd6988b24a899de009fb27e71c9e,
title = "Influences on practitioner treatment selection: Best research evidence and other considerations",
abstract = "The recent movement toward evidence-based practice in mental health services has highlighted the importance of research evidence in treatment decisions. However, the fact that many treatments with strong research support are not widely used in clinical settings suggests that practitioners' decisions are not based on research alone but rather are influenced by other considerations. This study examines the relative importance of various considerations on practitioner treatment selection using a national survey of mental health practitioners including doctoral-level psychologists, master's-level psychologists, and master's-level clinical social workers (N=206). Results indicate that practitioners are influenced by a range of considerations including empirical evidence from applied field studies, the perceived flexibility of a treatment, and the appeal of a treatment to colleagues and clients. These findings are discussed within the context of efforts to design, evaluate, and disseminate treatments with research support into clinical settings.",
keywords = "Consumer satisfaction, Flexibility, Practitioner preferences, Provider satisfaction, Treatment selection",
author = "Nelson, {Timothy D.} and Steele, {Ric G.}",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11414-007-9089-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "170--178",
journal = "Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research",
issn = "1094-3412",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influences on practitioner treatment selection

T2 - Best research evidence and other considerations

AU - Nelson, Timothy D.

AU - Steele, Ric G.

PY - 2008/4/1

Y1 - 2008/4/1

N2 - The recent movement toward evidence-based practice in mental health services has highlighted the importance of research evidence in treatment decisions. However, the fact that many treatments with strong research support are not widely used in clinical settings suggests that practitioners' decisions are not based on research alone but rather are influenced by other considerations. This study examines the relative importance of various considerations on practitioner treatment selection using a national survey of mental health practitioners including doctoral-level psychologists, master's-level psychologists, and master's-level clinical social workers (N=206). Results indicate that practitioners are influenced by a range of considerations including empirical evidence from applied field studies, the perceived flexibility of a treatment, and the appeal of a treatment to colleagues and clients. These findings are discussed within the context of efforts to design, evaluate, and disseminate treatments with research support into clinical settings.

AB - The recent movement toward evidence-based practice in mental health services has highlighted the importance of research evidence in treatment decisions. However, the fact that many treatments with strong research support are not widely used in clinical settings suggests that practitioners' decisions are not based on research alone but rather are influenced by other considerations. This study examines the relative importance of various considerations on practitioner treatment selection using a national survey of mental health practitioners including doctoral-level psychologists, master's-level psychologists, and master's-level clinical social workers (N=206). Results indicate that practitioners are influenced by a range of considerations including empirical evidence from applied field studies, the perceived flexibility of a treatment, and the appeal of a treatment to colleagues and clients. These findings are discussed within the context of efforts to design, evaluate, and disseminate treatments with research support into clinical settings.

KW - Consumer satisfaction

KW - Flexibility

KW - Practitioner preferences

KW - Provider satisfaction

KW - Treatment selection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=42449162338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=42449162338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11414-007-9089-8

DO - 10.1007/s11414-007-9089-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 17912644

AN - SCOPUS:42449162338

VL - 35

SP - 170

EP - 178

JO - Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research

JF - Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research

SN - 1094-3412

IS - 2

ER -