Influence of muscle strength to weight ratio on functional task performance

Jeffrey W. Ryder, Roxanne E. Buxton, Elizabeth Goetchius, Melissa Scott-Pandorf, Kyle J. Hackney, James Fiedler, Robert J. Ploutz-Snyder, Jacob J. Bloomberg, Lori L. Ploutz-Snyder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Existing models of muscle deconditioning such as bed rest are expensive and time-consuming. We propose a new model utilizing a weighted suit to manipulate muscle strength, power, or endurance relative to body weight. The aims of the study were to determine as to which muscle measures best predict functional task performance and to determine muscle performance thresholds below which task performance is impaired. Twenty subjects performed seven occupational astronaut tasks (supine and upright seat egress and walk, rise from fall, hatch opening, ladder climb, object carry, and construction board activity), while wearing a suit weighted with 0-120 % of body weight. Models of the relationship between muscle function/body weight and task completion time were developed using fractional polynomial regression and verified with pre- and post-flight astronaut performance data. Spline regression was used to identify muscle function thresholds for each task. Upright seat egress and walk was the most difficult task according to the spline regression analysis thresholds. Thresholds normalized to body weight were 17.8 N/kg for leg press isometric force, 17.6 W/kg for leg press power, 78.8 J/kg for leg press work, 5.9 N/kg isometric knee extension and 1.9 Nm/kg isokinetic knee extension torque. Leg press maximal isometric force/body weight was the most reliable measure for modeling performance of ambulatory tasks. Laboratory-based manipulation of relative strength has promise as an analog for spaceflight-induced loss of muscle function. Muscle performance values normalized to body weight can be used to predict occupational task performance and to establish relevant strength thresholds.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)911-921
Number of pages11
JournalEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology
Volume113
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2013

Fingerprint

Task Performance and Analysis
Muscle Strength
Weights and Measures
Muscles
Body Weight
Leg
Astronauts
Knee
Space Flight
Bed Rest
Torque
Regression Analysis

Keywords

  • Muscle
  • Power
  • Strength
  • Task performance
  • Work

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Ryder, J. W., Buxton, R. E., Goetchius, E., Scott-Pandorf, M., Hackney, K. J., Fiedler, J., ... Ploutz-Snyder, L. L. (2013). Influence of muscle strength to weight ratio on functional task performance. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 113(4), 911-921. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-012-2500-z

Influence of muscle strength to weight ratio on functional task performance. / Ryder, Jeffrey W.; Buxton, Roxanne E.; Goetchius, Elizabeth; Scott-Pandorf, Melissa; Hackney, Kyle J.; Fiedler, James; Ploutz-Snyder, Robert J.; Bloomberg, Jacob J.; Ploutz-Snyder, Lori L.

In: European Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. 113, No. 4, 01.04.2013, p. 911-921.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ryder, JW, Buxton, RE, Goetchius, E, Scott-Pandorf, M, Hackney, KJ, Fiedler, J, Ploutz-Snyder, RJ, Bloomberg, JJ & Ploutz-Snyder, LL 2013, 'Influence of muscle strength to weight ratio on functional task performance', European Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 113, no. 4, pp. 911-921. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-012-2500-z
Ryder, Jeffrey W. ; Buxton, Roxanne E. ; Goetchius, Elizabeth ; Scott-Pandorf, Melissa ; Hackney, Kyle J. ; Fiedler, James ; Ploutz-Snyder, Robert J. ; Bloomberg, Jacob J. ; Ploutz-Snyder, Lori L. / Influence of muscle strength to weight ratio on functional task performance. In: European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2013 ; Vol. 113, No. 4. pp. 911-921.
@article{59d54b148bf24c7e9abf079fa23044ea,
title = "Influence of muscle strength to weight ratio on functional task performance",
abstract = "Existing models of muscle deconditioning such as bed rest are expensive and time-consuming. We propose a new model utilizing a weighted suit to manipulate muscle strength, power, or endurance relative to body weight. The aims of the study were to determine as to which muscle measures best predict functional task performance and to determine muscle performance thresholds below which task performance is impaired. Twenty subjects performed seven occupational astronaut tasks (supine and upright seat egress and walk, rise from fall, hatch opening, ladder climb, object carry, and construction board activity), while wearing a suit weighted with 0-120 {\%} of body weight. Models of the relationship between muscle function/body weight and task completion time were developed using fractional polynomial regression and verified with pre- and post-flight astronaut performance data. Spline regression was used to identify muscle function thresholds for each task. Upright seat egress and walk was the most difficult task according to the spline regression analysis thresholds. Thresholds normalized to body weight were 17.8 N/kg for leg press isometric force, 17.6 W/kg for leg press power, 78.8 J/kg for leg press work, 5.9 N/kg isometric knee extension and 1.9 Nm/kg isokinetic knee extension torque. Leg press maximal isometric force/body weight was the most reliable measure for modeling performance of ambulatory tasks. Laboratory-based manipulation of relative strength has promise as an analog for spaceflight-induced loss of muscle function. Muscle performance values normalized to body weight can be used to predict occupational task performance and to establish relevant strength thresholds.",
keywords = "Muscle, Power, Strength, Task performance, Work",
author = "Ryder, {Jeffrey W.} and Buxton, {Roxanne E.} and Elizabeth Goetchius and Melissa Scott-Pandorf and Hackney, {Kyle J.} and James Fiedler and Ploutz-Snyder, {Robert J.} and Bloomberg, {Jacob J.} and Ploutz-Snyder, {Lori L.}",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00421-012-2500-z",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "113",
pages = "911--921",
journal = "European Journal of Applied Physiology",
issn = "1439-6319",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of muscle strength to weight ratio on functional task performance

AU - Ryder, Jeffrey W.

AU - Buxton, Roxanne E.

AU - Goetchius, Elizabeth

AU - Scott-Pandorf, Melissa

AU - Hackney, Kyle J.

AU - Fiedler, James

AU - Ploutz-Snyder, Robert J.

AU - Bloomberg, Jacob J.

AU - Ploutz-Snyder, Lori L.

PY - 2013/4/1

Y1 - 2013/4/1

N2 - Existing models of muscle deconditioning such as bed rest are expensive and time-consuming. We propose a new model utilizing a weighted suit to manipulate muscle strength, power, or endurance relative to body weight. The aims of the study were to determine as to which muscle measures best predict functional task performance and to determine muscle performance thresholds below which task performance is impaired. Twenty subjects performed seven occupational astronaut tasks (supine and upright seat egress and walk, rise from fall, hatch opening, ladder climb, object carry, and construction board activity), while wearing a suit weighted with 0-120 % of body weight. Models of the relationship between muscle function/body weight and task completion time were developed using fractional polynomial regression and verified with pre- and post-flight astronaut performance data. Spline regression was used to identify muscle function thresholds for each task. Upright seat egress and walk was the most difficult task according to the spline regression analysis thresholds. Thresholds normalized to body weight were 17.8 N/kg for leg press isometric force, 17.6 W/kg for leg press power, 78.8 J/kg for leg press work, 5.9 N/kg isometric knee extension and 1.9 Nm/kg isokinetic knee extension torque. Leg press maximal isometric force/body weight was the most reliable measure for modeling performance of ambulatory tasks. Laboratory-based manipulation of relative strength has promise as an analog for spaceflight-induced loss of muscle function. Muscle performance values normalized to body weight can be used to predict occupational task performance and to establish relevant strength thresholds.

AB - Existing models of muscle deconditioning such as bed rest are expensive and time-consuming. We propose a new model utilizing a weighted suit to manipulate muscle strength, power, or endurance relative to body weight. The aims of the study were to determine as to which muscle measures best predict functional task performance and to determine muscle performance thresholds below which task performance is impaired. Twenty subjects performed seven occupational astronaut tasks (supine and upright seat egress and walk, rise from fall, hatch opening, ladder climb, object carry, and construction board activity), while wearing a suit weighted with 0-120 % of body weight. Models of the relationship between muscle function/body weight and task completion time were developed using fractional polynomial regression and verified with pre- and post-flight astronaut performance data. Spline regression was used to identify muscle function thresholds for each task. Upright seat egress and walk was the most difficult task according to the spline regression analysis thresholds. Thresholds normalized to body weight were 17.8 N/kg for leg press isometric force, 17.6 W/kg for leg press power, 78.8 J/kg for leg press work, 5.9 N/kg isometric knee extension and 1.9 Nm/kg isokinetic knee extension torque. Leg press maximal isometric force/body weight was the most reliable measure for modeling performance of ambulatory tasks. Laboratory-based manipulation of relative strength has promise as an analog for spaceflight-induced loss of muscle function. Muscle performance values normalized to body weight can be used to predict occupational task performance and to establish relevant strength thresholds.

KW - Muscle

KW - Power

KW - Strength

KW - Task performance

KW - Work

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876281033&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876281033&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00421-012-2500-z

DO - 10.1007/s00421-012-2500-z

M3 - Article

C2 - 23011123

AN - SCOPUS:84876281033

VL - 113

SP - 911

EP - 921

JO - European Journal of Applied Physiology

JF - European Journal of Applied Physiology

SN - 1439-6319

IS - 4

ER -