Influence of margins on overall survival after hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis: A meta-analysis

Mashaal Dhir, Elizabeth R. Lyden, Antai Wang, Lynette M Smith, Fred Ullrich, Chandrakanth Are

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The aim of our study was to conduct a meta-analysis of reports published on hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) and determine whether a negative margin of 1 cm or more confers a survival advantage over subcentimeter negative margins. Background: Surgical margin is an important prognostic factor in patients undergoing hepatic resection for CRLM. Although there is a consensus that positive margins portend a worse outcome than negative margins, the extent of negative margins remains controversial. Methods: A PubMed search was conducted to identify articles on hepatic resection for CRLM. The 357 initially located articles were screened to identify 90 articles of interest. The texts of these 90 articles were completely reviewed to finalize 18 articles for inclusion in the study on the basis of absolute and relative inclusion criteria. Patients with positive margins were excluded from the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA 9.2 statistical software. Results: A total of 4821 patients with negative margins from the 18 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The overall 5-year survival for all patients was 41% [95% confidence interval (CI), 40%-43%]. The overall 5-year survival for the ≥1 cm negative margin subgroup was 46% (95% CI, 44%-48%) when compared with 38% (95% CI, 36%-40%) for less than 1 cm negative margin subgroup. The odds ratio for 1-cm or more negative margins was found to be 0.773 (95% CI, 0.638-0.938; P = 0.009) when compared with less than 1 cm negative margins. Conclusions: The results of this meta-analysis demonstrate that in patients undergoing hepatic resection for CRLM, a negative margin of 1 cm or more confers a survival advantage when compared with subcentimeter negative margins.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)234-242
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of surgery
Volume254
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2011

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Neoplasm Metastasis
Survival
Liver
Confidence Intervals
PubMed
Software
Odds Ratio

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Influence of margins on overall survival after hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis : A meta-analysis. / Dhir, Mashaal; Lyden, Elizabeth R.; Wang, Antai; Smith, Lynette M; Ullrich, Fred; Are, Chandrakanth.

In: Annals of surgery, Vol. 254, No. 2, 01.08.2011, p. 234-242.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dhir, Mashaal ; Lyden, Elizabeth R. ; Wang, Antai ; Smith, Lynette M ; Ullrich, Fred ; Are, Chandrakanth. / Influence of margins on overall survival after hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis : A meta-analysis. In: Annals of surgery. 2011 ; Vol. 254, No. 2. pp. 234-242.
@article{b4af5bd349b34cd9bf804025464da62e,
title = "Influence of margins on overall survival after hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis: A meta-analysis",
abstract = "Objective: The aim of our study was to conduct a meta-analysis of reports published on hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) and determine whether a negative margin of 1 cm or more confers a survival advantage over subcentimeter negative margins. Background: Surgical margin is an important prognostic factor in patients undergoing hepatic resection for CRLM. Although there is a consensus that positive margins portend a worse outcome than negative margins, the extent of negative margins remains controversial. Methods: A PubMed search was conducted to identify articles on hepatic resection for CRLM. The 357 initially located articles were screened to identify 90 articles of interest. The texts of these 90 articles were completely reviewed to finalize 18 articles for inclusion in the study on the basis of absolute and relative inclusion criteria. Patients with positive margins were excluded from the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA 9.2 statistical software. Results: A total of 4821 patients with negative margins from the 18 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The overall 5-year survival for all patients was 41{\%} [95{\%} confidence interval (CI), 40{\%}-43{\%}]. The overall 5-year survival for the ≥1 cm negative margin subgroup was 46{\%} (95{\%} CI, 44{\%}-48{\%}) when compared with 38{\%} (95{\%} CI, 36{\%}-40{\%}) for less than 1 cm negative margin subgroup. The odds ratio for 1-cm or more negative margins was found to be 0.773 (95{\%} CI, 0.638-0.938; P = 0.009) when compared with less than 1 cm negative margins. Conclusions: The results of this meta-analysis demonstrate that in patients undergoing hepatic resection for CRLM, a negative margin of 1 cm or more confers a survival advantage when compared with subcentimeter negative margins.",
author = "Mashaal Dhir and Lyden, {Elizabeth R.} and Antai Wang and Smith, {Lynette M} and Fred Ullrich and Chandrakanth Are",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/SLA.0b013e318223c609",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "254",
pages = "234--242",
journal = "Annals of Surgery",
issn = "0003-4932",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of margins on overall survival after hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis

T2 - A meta-analysis

AU - Dhir, Mashaal

AU - Lyden, Elizabeth R.

AU - Wang, Antai

AU - Smith, Lynette M

AU - Ullrich, Fred

AU - Are, Chandrakanth

PY - 2011/8/1

Y1 - 2011/8/1

N2 - Objective: The aim of our study was to conduct a meta-analysis of reports published on hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) and determine whether a negative margin of 1 cm or more confers a survival advantage over subcentimeter negative margins. Background: Surgical margin is an important prognostic factor in patients undergoing hepatic resection for CRLM. Although there is a consensus that positive margins portend a worse outcome than negative margins, the extent of negative margins remains controversial. Methods: A PubMed search was conducted to identify articles on hepatic resection for CRLM. The 357 initially located articles were screened to identify 90 articles of interest. The texts of these 90 articles were completely reviewed to finalize 18 articles for inclusion in the study on the basis of absolute and relative inclusion criteria. Patients with positive margins were excluded from the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA 9.2 statistical software. Results: A total of 4821 patients with negative margins from the 18 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The overall 5-year survival for all patients was 41% [95% confidence interval (CI), 40%-43%]. The overall 5-year survival for the ≥1 cm negative margin subgroup was 46% (95% CI, 44%-48%) when compared with 38% (95% CI, 36%-40%) for less than 1 cm negative margin subgroup. The odds ratio for 1-cm or more negative margins was found to be 0.773 (95% CI, 0.638-0.938; P = 0.009) when compared with less than 1 cm negative margins. Conclusions: The results of this meta-analysis demonstrate that in patients undergoing hepatic resection for CRLM, a negative margin of 1 cm or more confers a survival advantage when compared with subcentimeter negative margins.

AB - Objective: The aim of our study was to conduct a meta-analysis of reports published on hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) and determine whether a negative margin of 1 cm or more confers a survival advantage over subcentimeter negative margins. Background: Surgical margin is an important prognostic factor in patients undergoing hepatic resection for CRLM. Although there is a consensus that positive margins portend a worse outcome than negative margins, the extent of negative margins remains controversial. Methods: A PubMed search was conducted to identify articles on hepatic resection for CRLM. The 357 initially located articles were screened to identify 90 articles of interest. The texts of these 90 articles were completely reviewed to finalize 18 articles for inclusion in the study on the basis of absolute and relative inclusion criteria. Patients with positive margins were excluded from the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA 9.2 statistical software. Results: A total of 4821 patients with negative margins from the 18 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The overall 5-year survival for all patients was 41% [95% confidence interval (CI), 40%-43%]. The overall 5-year survival for the ≥1 cm negative margin subgroup was 46% (95% CI, 44%-48%) when compared with 38% (95% CI, 36%-40%) for less than 1 cm negative margin subgroup. The odds ratio for 1-cm or more negative margins was found to be 0.773 (95% CI, 0.638-0.938; P = 0.009) when compared with less than 1 cm negative margins. Conclusions: The results of this meta-analysis demonstrate that in patients undergoing hepatic resection for CRLM, a negative margin of 1 cm or more confers a survival advantage when compared with subcentimeter negative margins.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79961021310&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79961021310&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318223c609

DO - 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318223c609

M3 - Article

C2 - 21694583

AN - SCOPUS:79961021310

VL - 254

SP - 234

EP - 242

JO - Annals of Surgery

JF - Annals of Surgery

SN - 0003-4932

IS - 2

ER -