Infertility treatment and fertility-specific distress: A longitudinal analysis of a population-based sample of U.S. women

Arthur L. Greil, Julia McQuillan, Michele Lowry, Karina M. Shreffler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Because research on infertile women usually uses clinic-based samples of treatment seekers, it is difficult to sort out to what extent distress is the result of the condition of infertility itself and to what extent it is a consequence of the experience of infertility treatment. We use the National Survey of Fertility Barriers, a two-wave national probability sample of U.S. women, to disentangle the effects of infertility and infertility treatment on fertility-specific distress. Using a series of ANOVAs, we examine 266 infertile women who experienced infertility both at Wave 1 and at Wave 2, three years later. We compare eight groups of infertile women based on whether or not they have received treatment and on whether or not they have had a live birth. At Wave 1, infertile women who did not receive treatment and who had no live birth reported lower distress levels than women who received treatment at Wave 1 only, regardless of whether their infertility episode was followed by a live birth. At Wave 2, women who received no treatment have significantly lower fertility-specific distress than women who were treated at Wave 1 or at Waves 1 and 2, regardless of whether there was a subsequent live birth. Furthermore, fertility-specific distress did not increase over time among infertile women who did not receive treatment. The increase infertility-specific distress was significantly higher for women who received treatment at Wave 2 that was not followed by a live birth than for women who received no treatment or for women who received treatment at Wave 1 only. These patterns suggest that infertility treatment is associated with levels of distress over and above those associated with the state of being infertile in and of itself.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)87-94
Number of pages8
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume73
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2011

Fingerprint

Infertility
Fertility
fertility
Population
Live Birth
Therapeutics
Longitudinal Analysis
Waves
Sampling Studies
Analysis of Variance

Keywords

  • Fertility-specific distress
  • Infertility
  • Infertility treatment
  • Longitudinal women
  • USA

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Infertility treatment and fertility-specific distress : A longitudinal analysis of a population-based sample of U.S. women. / Greil, Arthur L.; McQuillan, Julia; Lowry, Michele; Shreffler, Karina M.

In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 73, No. 1, 01.07.2011, p. 87-94.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{92fdc57f30744830b4dbcdd412cf9285,
title = "Infertility treatment and fertility-specific distress: A longitudinal analysis of a population-based sample of U.S. women",
abstract = "Because research on infertile women usually uses clinic-based samples of treatment seekers, it is difficult to sort out to what extent distress is the result of the condition of infertility itself and to what extent it is a consequence of the experience of infertility treatment. We use the National Survey of Fertility Barriers, a two-wave national probability sample of U.S. women, to disentangle the effects of infertility and infertility treatment on fertility-specific distress. Using a series of ANOVAs, we examine 266 infertile women who experienced infertility both at Wave 1 and at Wave 2, three years later. We compare eight groups of infertile women based on whether or not they have received treatment and on whether or not they have had a live birth. At Wave 1, infertile women who did not receive treatment and who had no live birth reported lower distress levels than women who received treatment at Wave 1 only, regardless of whether their infertility episode was followed by a live birth. At Wave 2, women who received no treatment have significantly lower fertility-specific distress than women who were treated at Wave 1 or at Waves 1 and 2, regardless of whether there was a subsequent live birth. Furthermore, fertility-specific distress did not increase over time among infertile women who did not receive treatment. The increase infertility-specific distress was significantly higher for women who received treatment at Wave 2 that was not followed by a live birth than for women who received no treatment or for women who received treatment at Wave 1 only. These patterns suggest that infertility treatment is associated with levels of distress over and above those associated with the state of being infertile in and of itself.",
keywords = "Fertility-specific distress, Infertility, Infertility treatment, Longitudinal women, USA",
author = "Greil, {Arthur L.} and Julia McQuillan and Michele Lowry and Shreffler, {Karina M.}",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.04.023",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "73",
pages = "87--94",
journal = "Social Science and Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Infertility treatment and fertility-specific distress

T2 - A longitudinal analysis of a population-based sample of U.S. women

AU - Greil, Arthur L.

AU - McQuillan, Julia

AU - Lowry, Michele

AU - Shreffler, Karina M.

PY - 2011/7/1

Y1 - 2011/7/1

N2 - Because research on infertile women usually uses clinic-based samples of treatment seekers, it is difficult to sort out to what extent distress is the result of the condition of infertility itself and to what extent it is a consequence of the experience of infertility treatment. We use the National Survey of Fertility Barriers, a two-wave national probability sample of U.S. women, to disentangle the effects of infertility and infertility treatment on fertility-specific distress. Using a series of ANOVAs, we examine 266 infertile women who experienced infertility both at Wave 1 and at Wave 2, three years later. We compare eight groups of infertile women based on whether or not they have received treatment and on whether or not they have had a live birth. At Wave 1, infertile women who did not receive treatment and who had no live birth reported lower distress levels than women who received treatment at Wave 1 only, regardless of whether their infertility episode was followed by a live birth. At Wave 2, women who received no treatment have significantly lower fertility-specific distress than women who were treated at Wave 1 or at Waves 1 and 2, regardless of whether there was a subsequent live birth. Furthermore, fertility-specific distress did not increase over time among infertile women who did not receive treatment. The increase infertility-specific distress was significantly higher for women who received treatment at Wave 2 that was not followed by a live birth than for women who received no treatment or for women who received treatment at Wave 1 only. These patterns suggest that infertility treatment is associated with levels of distress over and above those associated with the state of being infertile in and of itself.

AB - Because research on infertile women usually uses clinic-based samples of treatment seekers, it is difficult to sort out to what extent distress is the result of the condition of infertility itself and to what extent it is a consequence of the experience of infertility treatment. We use the National Survey of Fertility Barriers, a two-wave national probability sample of U.S. women, to disentangle the effects of infertility and infertility treatment on fertility-specific distress. Using a series of ANOVAs, we examine 266 infertile women who experienced infertility both at Wave 1 and at Wave 2, three years later. We compare eight groups of infertile women based on whether or not they have received treatment and on whether or not they have had a live birth. At Wave 1, infertile women who did not receive treatment and who had no live birth reported lower distress levels than women who received treatment at Wave 1 only, regardless of whether their infertility episode was followed by a live birth. At Wave 2, women who received no treatment have significantly lower fertility-specific distress than women who were treated at Wave 1 or at Waves 1 and 2, regardless of whether there was a subsequent live birth. Furthermore, fertility-specific distress did not increase over time among infertile women who did not receive treatment. The increase infertility-specific distress was significantly higher for women who received treatment at Wave 2 that was not followed by a live birth than for women who received no treatment or for women who received treatment at Wave 1 only. These patterns suggest that infertility treatment is associated with levels of distress over and above those associated with the state of being infertile in and of itself.

KW - Fertility-specific distress

KW - Infertility

KW - Infertility treatment

KW - Longitudinal women

KW - USA

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959604545&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959604545&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.04.023

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.04.023

M3 - Article

C2 - 21645954

AN - SCOPUS:79959604545

VL - 73

SP - 87

EP - 94

JO - Social Science and Medicine

JF - Social Science and Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

IS - 1

ER -