Individual differences in valence bias

FMRI evidence of the initial negativity hypothesis

Nathan M. Petro, Tien T. Tong, Daniel J. Henley, Maital Neta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Facial expressions offer an ecologically valid model for examining individual differences in affective decision-making. They convey an emotional signal from a social agent and provide important predictive information about one's environment (presence of potential rewards or threats). Although some expressions provide clear predictive information (angry, happy), others (surprised) are ambiguous in that they predict both positive and negative outcomes. Thus, surprised faces can delineate an individual's valence bias, or the tendency to interpret ambiguity as positive or negative. Our initial negativity hypothesis suggests that the initial response to ambiguity is negative, and that positivity relies on emotion regulation. We tested this hypothesis by comparing brain activity during explicit emotion regulation (reappraisal) and while freely viewing facial expressions, and measuring the relationship between brain activity and valence bias. Brain regions recruited during reappraisal showed greater activity for surprise in individuals with an increasingly positive valence bias. Additionally, we linked amygdala activity with an initial negativity, revealing a pattern similarity in individuals with negative bias between viewing surprised faces and maintaining negativity. Finally, these individuals failed to show normal habituation to clear negativity. These results support the initial negativity hypothesis, and are consistent with emotion research in both children and adult populations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)687-698
Number of pages12
JournalSocial Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Volume13
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Individuality
Emotions
Facial Expression
Brain
Amygdala
Reward
Decision Making
Research
Population

Keywords

  • Ambiguity
  • Amygdala
  • Emotion regulation
  • Habituation
  • Pattern similarity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Individual differences in valence bias : FMRI evidence of the initial negativity hypothesis. / Petro, Nathan M.; Tong, Tien T.; Henley, Daniel J.; Neta, Maital.

In: Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, Vol. 13, No. 7, 01.01.2018, p. 687-698.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2e1982dc5ea846518778accd013a1c77,
title = "Individual differences in valence bias: FMRI evidence of the initial negativity hypothesis",
abstract = "Facial expressions offer an ecologically valid model for examining individual differences in affective decision-making. They convey an emotional signal from a social agent and provide important predictive information about one's environment (presence of potential rewards or threats). Although some expressions provide clear predictive information (angry, happy), others (surprised) are ambiguous in that they predict both positive and negative outcomes. Thus, surprised faces can delineate an individual's valence bias, or the tendency to interpret ambiguity as positive or negative. Our initial negativity hypothesis suggests that the initial response to ambiguity is negative, and that positivity relies on emotion regulation. We tested this hypothesis by comparing brain activity during explicit emotion regulation (reappraisal) and while freely viewing facial expressions, and measuring the relationship between brain activity and valence bias. Brain regions recruited during reappraisal showed greater activity for surprise in individuals with an increasingly positive valence bias. Additionally, we linked amygdala activity with an initial negativity, revealing a pattern similarity in individuals with negative bias between viewing surprised faces and maintaining negativity. Finally, these individuals failed to show normal habituation to clear negativity. These results support the initial negativity hypothesis, and are consistent with emotion research in both children and adult populations.",
keywords = "Ambiguity, Amygdala, Emotion regulation, Habituation, Pattern similarity",
author = "Petro, {Nathan M.} and Tong, {Tien T.} and Henley, {Daniel J.} and Maital Neta",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/scan/nsy049",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "687--698",
journal = "Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience",
issn = "1749-5024",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Individual differences in valence bias

T2 - FMRI evidence of the initial negativity hypothesis

AU - Petro, Nathan M.

AU - Tong, Tien T.

AU - Henley, Daniel J.

AU - Neta, Maital

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Facial expressions offer an ecologically valid model for examining individual differences in affective decision-making. They convey an emotional signal from a social agent and provide important predictive information about one's environment (presence of potential rewards or threats). Although some expressions provide clear predictive information (angry, happy), others (surprised) are ambiguous in that they predict both positive and negative outcomes. Thus, surprised faces can delineate an individual's valence bias, or the tendency to interpret ambiguity as positive or negative. Our initial negativity hypothesis suggests that the initial response to ambiguity is negative, and that positivity relies on emotion regulation. We tested this hypothesis by comparing brain activity during explicit emotion regulation (reappraisal) and while freely viewing facial expressions, and measuring the relationship between brain activity and valence bias. Brain regions recruited during reappraisal showed greater activity for surprise in individuals with an increasingly positive valence bias. Additionally, we linked amygdala activity with an initial negativity, revealing a pattern similarity in individuals with negative bias between viewing surprised faces and maintaining negativity. Finally, these individuals failed to show normal habituation to clear negativity. These results support the initial negativity hypothesis, and are consistent with emotion research in both children and adult populations.

AB - Facial expressions offer an ecologically valid model for examining individual differences in affective decision-making. They convey an emotional signal from a social agent and provide important predictive information about one's environment (presence of potential rewards or threats). Although some expressions provide clear predictive information (angry, happy), others (surprised) are ambiguous in that they predict both positive and negative outcomes. Thus, surprised faces can delineate an individual's valence bias, or the tendency to interpret ambiguity as positive or negative. Our initial negativity hypothesis suggests that the initial response to ambiguity is negative, and that positivity relies on emotion regulation. We tested this hypothesis by comparing brain activity during explicit emotion regulation (reappraisal) and while freely viewing facial expressions, and measuring the relationship between brain activity and valence bias. Brain regions recruited during reappraisal showed greater activity for surprise in individuals with an increasingly positive valence bias. Additionally, we linked amygdala activity with an initial negativity, revealing a pattern similarity in individuals with negative bias between viewing surprised faces and maintaining negativity. Finally, these individuals failed to show normal habituation to clear negativity. These results support the initial negativity hypothesis, and are consistent with emotion research in both children and adult populations.

KW - Ambiguity

KW - Amygdala

KW - Emotion regulation

KW - Habituation

KW - Pattern similarity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054810884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054810884&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/scan/nsy049

DO - 10.1093/scan/nsy049

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 687

EP - 698

JO - Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

JF - Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

SN - 1749-5024

IS - 7

ER -