Individual differences in rats' reactivity to novelty and the unconditioned and conditioned locomotor effects of methamphetamine

Rick A Bevins, Jessica L. Peterson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Rat's reactivity to inescapable novelty can predict the subsequent psychomotor effects of many stimulants. This relation has not been examined for methamphetamine. Experiment 1 assessed the locomotor effects of methamphetamine (0.0625-1.0 mg/kg). On average, acute administration of methamphetamine (0.25, 0.5, and 1 mg/kg) had a stimulant effect on activity; locomotor sensitization was seen after repeated administration of 0.5 and 1 mg/kg. In a subsequent drug-free test, rats that had the locomotor chamber paired with 0.25, 0.5, or 1 mg/kg methamphetamine on eight separate occasions were more active than controls - conditioned hyperactivity. Experiment 2 used the 0.5-mg/kg dose to examine whether forced novelty exposure (novelty-induced activity) or free-choice novelty (approach to novel environment or object interaction) was predictive of methamphetamine's psychomotor effects. Only reactivity to inescapable novelty was systematically correlated with methamphetamine-induced activity. Rats more reactive to novelty [high responders (HR)] were more active to the acute and chronic methamphetamine challenge. Furthermore, these HR showed more conditioned hyperactivity than low responders (LR). Although acute methamphetamine did not have a stimulant effect in LR, only the LR displayed locomotor sensitization after chronic methamphetamine. This research extends the predictive variable of reactivity to inescapable novelty to methamphetamine's conditioned and unconditioned locomotor effects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)65-74
Number of pages10
JournalPharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
Volume79
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2004

Fingerprint

Methamphetamine
Individuality
Rats
Experiments

Keywords

  • Activity
  • Associative learning
  • Context conditioning
  • Drug abuse
  • Individual differences
  • Locomotor stimulant
  • Methamphetamine
  • Novelty
  • Object interaction
  • Rat
  • Sensitization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Toxicology
  • Pharmacology
  • Clinical Biochemistry
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Individual differences in rats' reactivity to novelty and the unconditioned and conditioned locomotor effects of methamphetamine. / Bevins, Rick A; Peterson, Jessica L.

In: Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, Vol. 79, No. 1, 01.09.2004, p. 65-74.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{84ce9d19350c4cb8b01cb0d62bbf9a55,
title = "Individual differences in rats' reactivity to novelty and the unconditioned and conditioned locomotor effects of methamphetamine",
abstract = "Rat's reactivity to inescapable novelty can predict the subsequent psychomotor effects of many stimulants. This relation has not been examined for methamphetamine. Experiment 1 assessed the locomotor effects of methamphetamine (0.0625-1.0 mg/kg). On average, acute administration of methamphetamine (0.25, 0.5, and 1 mg/kg) had a stimulant effect on activity; locomotor sensitization was seen after repeated administration of 0.5 and 1 mg/kg. In a subsequent drug-free test, rats that had the locomotor chamber paired with 0.25, 0.5, or 1 mg/kg methamphetamine on eight separate occasions were more active than controls - conditioned hyperactivity. Experiment 2 used the 0.5-mg/kg dose to examine whether forced novelty exposure (novelty-induced activity) or free-choice novelty (approach to novel environment or object interaction) was predictive of methamphetamine's psychomotor effects. Only reactivity to inescapable novelty was systematically correlated with methamphetamine-induced activity. Rats more reactive to novelty [high responders (HR)] were more active to the acute and chronic methamphetamine challenge. Furthermore, these HR showed more conditioned hyperactivity than low responders (LR). Although acute methamphetamine did not have a stimulant effect in LR, only the LR displayed locomotor sensitization after chronic methamphetamine. This research extends the predictive variable of reactivity to inescapable novelty to methamphetamine's conditioned and unconditioned locomotor effects.",
keywords = "Activity, Associative learning, Context conditioning, Drug abuse, Individual differences, Locomotor stimulant, Methamphetamine, Novelty, Object interaction, Rat, Sensitization",
author = "Bevins, {Rick A} and Peterson, {Jessica L.}",
year = "2004",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.pbb.2004.06.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "79",
pages = "65--74",
journal = "Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior",
issn = "0091-3057",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Individual differences in rats' reactivity to novelty and the unconditioned and conditioned locomotor effects of methamphetamine

AU - Bevins, Rick A

AU - Peterson, Jessica L.

PY - 2004/9/1

Y1 - 2004/9/1

N2 - Rat's reactivity to inescapable novelty can predict the subsequent psychomotor effects of many stimulants. This relation has not been examined for methamphetamine. Experiment 1 assessed the locomotor effects of methamphetamine (0.0625-1.0 mg/kg). On average, acute administration of methamphetamine (0.25, 0.5, and 1 mg/kg) had a stimulant effect on activity; locomotor sensitization was seen after repeated administration of 0.5 and 1 mg/kg. In a subsequent drug-free test, rats that had the locomotor chamber paired with 0.25, 0.5, or 1 mg/kg methamphetamine on eight separate occasions were more active than controls - conditioned hyperactivity. Experiment 2 used the 0.5-mg/kg dose to examine whether forced novelty exposure (novelty-induced activity) or free-choice novelty (approach to novel environment or object interaction) was predictive of methamphetamine's psychomotor effects. Only reactivity to inescapable novelty was systematically correlated with methamphetamine-induced activity. Rats more reactive to novelty [high responders (HR)] were more active to the acute and chronic methamphetamine challenge. Furthermore, these HR showed more conditioned hyperactivity than low responders (LR). Although acute methamphetamine did not have a stimulant effect in LR, only the LR displayed locomotor sensitization after chronic methamphetamine. This research extends the predictive variable of reactivity to inescapable novelty to methamphetamine's conditioned and unconditioned locomotor effects.

AB - Rat's reactivity to inescapable novelty can predict the subsequent psychomotor effects of many stimulants. This relation has not been examined for methamphetamine. Experiment 1 assessed the locomotor effects of methamphetamine (0.0625-1.0 mg/kg). On average, acute administration of methamphetamine (0.25, 0.5, and 1 mg/kg) had a stimulant effect on activity; locomotor sensitization was seen after repeated administration of 0.5 and 1 mg/kg. In a subsequent drug-free test, rats that had the locomotor chamber paired with 0.25, 0.5, or 1 mg/kg methamphetamine on eight separate occasions were more active than controls - conditioned hyperactivity. Experiment 2 used the 0.5-mg/kg dose to examine whether forced novelty exposure (novelty-induced activity) or free-choice novelty (approach to novel environment or object interaction) was predictive of methamphetamine's psychomotor effects. Only reactivity to inescapable novelty was systematically correlated with methamphetamine-induced activity. Rats more reactive to novelty [high responders (HR)] were more active to the acute and chronic methamphetamine challenge. Furthermore, these HR showed more conditioned hyperactivity than low responders (LR). Although acute methamphetamine did not have a stimulant effect in LR, only the LR displayed locomotor sensitization after chronic methamphetamine. This research extends the predictive variable of reactivity to inescapable novelty to methamphetamine's conditioned and unconditioned locomotor effects.

KW - Activity

KW - Associative learning

KW - Context conditioning

KW - Drug abuse

KW - Individual differences

KW - Locomotor stimulant

KW - Methamphetamine

KW - Novelty

KW - Object interaction

KW - Rat

KW - Sensitization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4544224583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4544224583&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pbb.2004.06.002

DO - 10.1016/j.pbb.2004.06.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 15388285

AN - SCOPUS:4544224583

VL - 79

SP - 65

EP - 74

JO - Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

JF - Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

SN - 0091-3057

IS - 1

ER -