Individual differences in masculine honor beliefs predict attitudes toward aggressive security measures, war, and peace

Donald A. Saucier, Russell J. Webster, Jessica L. McManus, Tammy L. Sonnentag, Conor J. O'Dea, Megan L. Strain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We hypothesized that individual differences in masculine honor beliefs (MHBs) would predict participants' views of the world and the potential for evil and good among the people in it, as well as their attitudes toward war, peace, and aggressive security policies. Participants' levels of MHBs were positively associated with their support for war and aggressive security policies (Studies 1 and 2), as well as beliefs in pure evil and perceptions of the world as a competitive jungle (Study 2), and they were negatively associated with their support for peacemaking (Study 2) even after controlling for participants' levels of social desirability, conservatism, and trait aggression (Study 1); sex (Studies 1 and 2); and beliefs in pure evil and pure good (Study 2). We contend that individual differences in MHB are important for understanding how individuals perceive their worlds as places in which the potential and capacity for violence are needed to maintain safety and security.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)112-116
Number of pages5
JournalPeace and Conflict
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2018

Fingerprint

honor
peace
security policy
social desirability
policy studies
conservatism
aggression
violence

Keywords

  • Aggression
  • Attitudes toward war
  • Individual differences
  • Masculine honor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Individual differences in masculine honor beliefs predict attitudes toward aggressive security measures, war, and peace. / Saucier, Donald A.; Webster, Russell J.; McManus, Jessica L.; Sonnentag, Tammy L.; O'Dea, Conor J.; Strain, Megan L.

In: Peace and Conflict, Vol. 24, No. 1, 01.02.2018, p. 112-116.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Saucier, Donald A. ; Webster, Russell J. ; McManus, Jessica L. ; Sonnentag, Tammy L. ; O'Dea, Conor J. ; Strain, Megan L. / Individual differences in masculine honor beliefs predict attitudes toward aggressive security measures, war, and peace. In: Peace and Conflict. 2018 ; Vol. 24, No. 1. pp. 112-116.
@article{5280a5339ff44b7b85ce45955a39a524,
title = "Individual differences in masculine honor beliefs predict attitudes toward aggressive security measures, war, and peace",
abstract = "We hypothesized that individual differences in masculine honor beliefs (MHBs) would predict participants' views of the world and the potential for evil and good among the people in it, as well as their attitudes toward war, peace, and aggressive security policies. Participants' levels of MHBs were positively associated with their support for war and aggressive security policies (Studies 1 and 2), as well as beliefs in pure evil and perceptions of the world as a competitive jungle (Study 2), and they were negatively associated with their support for peacemaking (Study 2) even after controlling for participants' levels of social desirability, conservatism, and trait aggression (Study 1); sex (Studies 1 and 2); and beliefs in pure evil and pure good (Study 2). We contend that individual differences in MHB are important for understanding how individuals perceive their worlds as places in which the potential and capacity for violence are needed to maintain safety and security.",
keywords = "Aggression, Attitudes toward war, Individual differences, Masculine honor",
author = "Saucier, {Donald A.} and Webster, {Russell J.} and McManus, {Jessica L.} and Sonnentag, {Tammy L.} and O'Dea, {Conor J.} and Strain, {Megan L.}",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/pac0000303",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "112--116",
journal = "Peace and Conflict",
issn = "1078-1919",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Individual differences in masculine honor beliefs predict attitudes toward aggressive security measures, war, and peace

AU - Saucier, Donald A.

AU - Webster, Russell J.

AU - McManus, Jessica L.

AU - Sonnentag, Tammy L.

AU - O'Dea, Conor J.

AU - Strain, Megan L.

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - We hypothesized that individual differences in masculine honor beliefs (MHBs) would predict participants' views of the world and the potential for evil and good among the people in it, as well as their attitudes toward war, peace, and aggressive security policies. Participants' levels of MHBs were positively associated with their support for war and aggressive security policies (Studies 1 and 2), as well as beliefs in pure evil and perceptions of the world as a competitive jungle (Study 2), and they were negatively associated with their support for peacemaking (Study 2) even after controlling for participants' levels of social desirability, conservatism, and trait aggression (Study 1); sex (Studies 1 and 2); and beliefs in pure evil and pure good (Study 2). We contend that individual differences in MHB are important for understanding how individuals perceive their worlds as places in which the potential and capacity for violence are needed to maintain safety and security.

AB - We hypothesized that individual differences in masculine honor beliefs (MHBs) would predict participants' views of the world and the potential for evil and good among the people in it, as well as their attitudes toward war, peace, and aggressive security policies. Participants' levels of MHBs were positively associated with their support for war and aggressive security policies (Studies 1 and 2), as well as beliefs in pure evil and perceptions of the world as a competitive jungle (Study 2), and they were negatively associated with their support for peacemaking (Study 2) even after controlling for participants' levels of social desirability, conservatism, and trait aggression (Study 1); sex (Studies 1 and 2); and beliefs in pure evil and pure good (Study 2). We contend that individual differences in MHB are important for understanding how individuals perceive their worlds as places in which the potential and capacity for violence are needed to maintain safety and security.

KW - Aggression

KW - Attitudes toward war

KW - Individual differences

KW - Masculine honor

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043975074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85043975074&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/pac0000303

DO - 10.1037/pac0000303

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85043975074

VL - 24

SP - 112

EP - 116

JO - Peace and Conflict

JF - Peace and Conflict

SN - 1078-1919

IS - 1

ER -