Incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia in burn patients with inhalation injury treated with high frequency percussive ventilation versus volume control ventilation: A systematic review

Haitham S. Al Ashry, George Mansour, Andre C Kalil, Ryan W. Walters, Renuga Vivekanandan

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Pneumonia increases mortality in burn patients with inhalation injuries. We evaluated whether the use of High Frequency Percussive Ventilation (HFPV) in burn patients with inhalation injuries can decrease rates of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP) compared to Volume Control Ventilation (VCV). Methods Data were gathered from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, reference lists, and hand search. For unpublished data we searched ClinicalTrials.gov and RePORTER. We included observational and Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) that compared rates of VAP with the use of HFPV and VCV in adult burn patients with inhalation injury. Two reviewers independently extracted data from the retrieved studies and assessed them for eligibility, methodology, and quality. Results 281 abstracts were reviewed, of which 4 studies (540 patients) were included. Two were observational and two were RCTs. All studies had moderate risk of bias. One study had low external validity while others had moderate external validity. The two observational studies found non-concordant results. One study found a 24% statistically significant reduction in the rates of VAP while the other found no difference. The two RCTs had small sample sizes. There was no significant difference in VAP rates between HFPV and VCV. The VCV arms of the four studies were heterogeneous. Only one study used low tidal volumes, whereas the rest used high tidal volumes in the VCV arm. Conclusion Evidence about decreased incidence of VAP in burn patients with inhalation injuries who are on HFPV compared to those on VCV is inconclusive. Although enhanced airway clearance by HFPV was thought to play a role in decreasing VAP in this population, high tidal volume in the VCV arms could be a confounding factor that should be eliminated in future studies before a firm conclusion can be reached. More RCTs comparing HFPV to low tidal volume VCV are needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1193-1200
Number of pages8
JournalBurns
Volume42
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016

Fingerprint

High-Frequency Ventilation
Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
Inhalation
Ventilation
Tidal Volume
Incidence
Wounds and Injuries
Randomized Controlled Trials
PubMed
Sample Size
Observational Studies
Pneumonia
Mortality

Keywords

  • Burns
  • High frequency percussive ventilation
  • Inhalation injury
  • Ventilator associated pneumonia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia in burn patients with inhalation injury treated with high frequency percussive ventilation versus volume control ventilation : A systematic review. / Al Ashry, Haitham S.; Mansour, George; Kalil, Andre C; Walters, Ryan W.; Vivekanandan, Renuga.

In: Burns, Vol. 42, No. 6, 01.09.2016, p. 1193-1200.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{0d8a0a4751cf4de89ddf68fc9e75d9b7,
title = "Incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia in burn patients with inhalation injury treated with high frequency percussive ventilation versus volume control ventilation: A systematic review",
abstract = "Background Pneumonia increases mortality in burn patients with inhalation injuries. We evaluated whether the use of High Frequency Percussive Ventilation (HFPV) in burn patients with inhalation injuries can decrease rates of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP) compared to Volume Control Ventilation (VCV). Methods Data were gathered from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, reference lists, and hand search. For unpublished data we searched ClinicalTrials.gov and RePORTER. We included observational and Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) that compared rates of VAP with the use of HFPV and VCV in adult burn patients with inhalation injury. Two reviewers independently extracted data from the retrieved studies and assessed them for eligibility, methodology, and quality. Results 281 abstracts were reviewed, of which 4 studies (540 patients) were included. Two were observational and two were RCTs. All studies had moderate risk of bias. One study had low external validity while others had moderate external validity. The two observational studies found non-concordant results. One study found a 24{\%} statistically significant reduction in the rates of VAP while the other found no difference. The two RCTs had small sample sizes. There was no significant difference in VAP rates between HFPV and VCV. The VCV arms of the four studies were heterogeneous. Only one study used low tidal volumes, whereas the rest used high tidal volumes in the VCV arm. Conclusion Evidence about decreased incidence of VAP in burn patients with inhalation injuries who are on HFPV compared to those on VCV is inconclusive. Although enhanced airway clearance by HFPV was thought to play a role in decreasing VAP in this population, high tidal volume in the VCV arms could be a confounding factor that should be eliminated in future studies before a firm conclusion can be reached. More RCTs comparing HFPV to low tidal volume VCV are needed.",
keywords = "Burns, High frequency percussive ventilation, Inhalation injury, Ventilator associated pneumonia",
author = "{Al Ashry}, {Haitham S.} and George Mansour and Kalil, {Andre C} and Walters, {Ryan W.} and Renuga Vivekanandan",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.burns.2016.02.024",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "1193--1200",
journal = "Burns",
issn = "0305-4179",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia in burn patients with inhalation injury treated with high frequency percussive ventilation versus volume control ventilation

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Al Ashry, Haitham S.

AU - Mansour, George

AU - Kalil, Andre C

AU - Walters, Ryan W.

AU - Vivekanandan, Renuga

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - Background Pneumonia increases mortality in burn patients with inhalation injuries. We evaluated whether the use of High Frequency Percussive Ventilation (HFPV) in burn patients with inhalation injuries can decrease rates of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP) compared to Volume Control Ventilation (VCV). Methods Data were gathered from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, reference lists, and hand search. For unpublished data we searched ClinicalTrials.gov and RePORTER. We included observational and Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) that compared rates of VAP with the use of HFPV and VCV in adult burn patients with inhalation injury. Two reviewers independently extracted data from the retrieved studies and assessed them for eligibility, methodology, and quality. Results 281 abstracts were reviewed, of which 4 studies (540 patients) were included. Two were observational and two were RCTs. All studies had moderate risk of bias. One study had low external validity while others had moderate external validity. The two observational studies found non-concordant results. One study found a 24% statistically significant reduction in the rates of VAP while the other found no difference. The two RCTs had small sample sizes. There was no significant difference in VAP rates between HFPV and VCV. The VCV arms of the four studies were heterogeneous. Only one study used low tidal volumes, whereas the rest used high tidal volumes in the VCV arm. Conclusion Evidence about decreased incidence of VAP in burn patients with inhalation injuries who are on HFPV compared to those on VCV is inconclusive. Although enhanced airway clearance by HFPV was thought to play a role in decreasing VAP in this population, high tidal volume in the VCV arms could be a confounding factor that should be eliminated in future studies before a firm conclusion can be reached. More RCTs comparing HFPV to low tidal volume VCV are needed.

AB - Background Pneumonia increases mortality in burn patients with inhalation injuries. We evaluated whether the use of High Frequency Percussive Ventilation (HFPV) in burn patients with inhalation injuries can decrease rates of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP) compared to Volume Control Ventilation (VCV). Methods Data were gathered from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, reference lists, and hand search. For unpublished data we searched ClinicalTrials.gov and RePORTER. We included observational and Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) that compared rates of VAP with the use of HFPV and VCV in adult burn patients with inhalation injury. Two reviewers independently extracted data from the retrieved studies and assessed them for eligibility, methodology, and quality. Results 281 abstracts were reviewed, of which 4 studies (540 patients) were included. Two were observational and two were RCTs. All studies had moderate risk of bias. One study had low external validity while others had moderate external validity. The two observational studies found non-concordant results. One study found a 24% statistically significant reduction in the rates of VAP while the other found no difference. The two RCTs had small sample sizes. There was no significant difference in VAP rates between HFPV and VCV. The VCV arms of the four studies were heterogeneous. Only one study used low tidal volumes, whereas the rest used high tidal volumes in the VCV arm. Conclusion Evidence about decreased incidence of VAP in burn patients with inhalation injuries who are on HFPV compared to those on VCV is inconclusive. Although enhanced airway clearance by HFPV was thought to play a role in decreasing VAP in this population, high tidal volume in the VCV arms could be a confounding factor that should be eliminated in future studies before a firm conclusion can be reached. More RCTs comparing HFPV to low tidal volume VCV are needed.

KW - Burns

KW - High frequency percussive ventilation

KW - Inhalation injury

KW - Ventilator associated pneumonia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961782099&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84961782099&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.burns.2016.02.024

DO - 10.1016/j.burns.2016.02.024

M3 - Review article

C2 - 27025800

AN - SCOPUS:84961782099

VL - 42

SP - 1193

EP - 1200

JO - Burns

JF - Burns

SN - 0305-4179

IS - 6

ER -