Improving physical activity program adoption using integrated research-practice partnerships

an effectiveness-implementation trial

Samantha M. Harden, Sallie Beth Johnson, Fabio Almeida, Paul A Estabrooks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Integrated research-practice partnerships (IRPPs) may improve adoption of evidence-based programs. The aim of this study is to compare adoption of an IRPP-developed physical activity (PA) program (Fit Extension, FitEx) to a typical efficacy-effectiveness-dissemination pipeline model program (Active Living Every Day, ALED). Guided by the Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework, a randomized controlled trial assigned health educators (HEs) to FitEx (n = 18) or ALED (n = 18). Fourteen HEs adopted FitEx, while two HEs adopted ALED (χ2 = 21.8; p < 0.05). FitEx HEs took less time to deliver (p < 0.05), stated greater intentions for continued program delivery (p < 0.05), and reached more participants (n = 1097 total; 83 % female; 70 % Caucasian; Mage = 44 ± 11.8) per HE than ALED (n = 27 total; 60 % female; 50 % Caucasian; Mage = 41 ± 11.3). No significant difference existed in FitEx or ALED participants’ increased PA (Mincrease = 9.12 ±29.09 min/day; p > 0.05). IRPP-developed programs may improve PA program adoption, implementation, and maintenance and may also result in programs that have higher reach—without reducing effectiveness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)28-38
Number of pages11
JournalTranslational Behavioral Medicine
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Partnership Practice
Health Educators
Exercise
Maintenance
Research
Randomized Controlled Trials

Keywords

  • Physical activity
  • RE-AIM
  • Research-practice
  • Translation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Improving physical activity program adoption using integrated research-practice partnerships : an effectiveness-implementation trial. / Harden, Samantha M.; Johnson, Sallie Beth; Almeida, Fabio; Estabrooks, Paul A.

In: Translational Behavioral Medicine, Vol. 7, No. 1, 01.03.2017, p. 28-38.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ea12433c03784b4e8e0b141083b3ed9a,
title = "Improving physical activity program adoption using integrated research-practice partnerships: an effectiveness-implementation trial",
abstract = "Integrated research-practice partnerships (IRPPs) may improve adoption of evidence-based programs. The aim of this study is to compare adoption of an IRPP-developed physical activity (PA) program (Fit Extension, FitEx) to a typical efficacy-effectiveness-dissemination pipeline model program (Active Living Every Day, ALED). Guided by the Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework, a randomized controlled trial assigned health educators (HEs) to FitEx (n = 18) or ALED (n = 18). Fourteen HEs adopted FitEx, while two HEs adopted ALED (χ2 = 21.8; p < 0.05). FitEx HEs took less time to deliver (p < 0.05), stated greater intentions for continued program delivery (p < 0.05), and reached more participants (n = 1097 total; 83 {\%} female; 70 {\%} Caucasian; Mage = 44 ± 11.8) per HE than ALED (n = 27 total; 60 {\%} female; 50 {\%} Caucasian; Mage = 41 ± 11.3). No significant difference existed in FitEx or ALED participants’ increased PA (Mincrease = 9.12 ±29.09 min/day; p > 0.05). IRPP-developed programs may improve PA program adoption, implementation, and maintenance and may also result in programs that have higher reach—without reducing effectiveness.",
keywords = "Physical activity, RE-AIM, Research-practice, Translation",
author = "Harden, {Samantha M.} and Johnson, {Sallie Beth} and Fabio Almeida and Estabrooks, {Paul A}",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s13142-015-0380-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "28--38",
journal = "Translational Behavioral Medicine",
issn = "1869-6716",
publisher = "Springer Publishing Company",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving physical activity program adoption using integrated research-practice partnerships

T2 - an effectiveness-implementation trial

AU - Harden, Samantha M.

AU - Johnson, Sallie Beth

AU - Almeida, Fabio

AU - Estabrooks, Paul A

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Integrated research-practice partnerships (IRPPs) may improve adoption of evidence-based programs. The aim of this study is to compare adoption of an IRPP-developed physical activity (PA) program (Fit Extension, FitEx) to a typical efficacy-effectiveness-dissemination pipeline model program (Active Living Every Day, ALED). Guided by the Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework, a randomized controlled trial assigned health educators (HEs) to FitEx (n = 18) or ALED (n = 18). Fourteen HEs adopted FitEx, while two HEs adopted ALED (χ2 = 21.8; p < 0.05). FitEx HEs took less time to deliver (p < 0.05), stated greater intentions for continued program delivery (p < 0.05), and reached more participants (n = 1097 total; 83 % female; 70 % Caucasian; Mage = 44 ± 11.8) per HE than ALED (n = 27 total; 60 % female; 50 % Caucasian; Mage = 41 ± 11.3). No significant difference existed in FitEx or ALED participants’ increased PA (Mincrease = 9.12 ±29.09 min/day; p > 0.05). IRPP-developed programs may improve PA program adoption, implementation, and maintenance and may also result in programs that have higher reach—without reducing effectiveness.

AB - Integrated research-practice partnerships (IRPPs) may improve adoption of evidence-based programs. The aim of this study is to compare adoption of an IRPP-developed physical activity (PA) program (Fit Extension, FitEx) to a typical efficacy-effectiveness-dissemination pipeline model program (Active Living Every Day, ALED). Guided by the Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework, a randomized controlled trial assigned health educators (HEs) to FitEx (n = 18) or ALED (n = 18). Fourteen HEs adopted FitEx, while two HEs adopted ALED (χ2 = 21.8; p < 0.05). FitEx HEs took less time to deliver (p < 0.05), stated greater intentions for continued program delivery (p < 0.05), and reached more participants (n = 1097 total; 83 % female; 70 % Caucasian; Mage = 44 ± 11.8) per HE than ALED (n = 27 total; 60 % female; 50 % Caucasian; Mage = 41 ± 11.3). No significant difference existed in FitEx or ALED participants’ increased PA (Mincrease = 9.12 ±29.09 min/day; p > 0.05). IRPP-developed programs may improve PA program adoption, implementation, and maintenance and may also result in programs that have higher reach—without reducing effectiveness.

KW - Physical activity

KW - RE-AIM

KW - Research-practice

KW - Translation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015753293&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015753293&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s13142-015-0380-6

DO - 10.1007/s13142-015-0380-6

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 28

EP - 38

JO - Translational Behavioral Medicine

JF - Translational Behavioral Medicine

SN - 1869-6716

IS - 1

ER -