Improving Outcomes

Sarah McBrien, Zachary Bailey, Jonathan Ryder, Paige Scholer, Geoffrey Talmon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the strength of study design and outcomes in literature describing pathology education for medical students. Methods: A search was conducted for articles related to pathology education published over 45 years describing an educational intervention. The primary data collected included phase of education, domain of objectives, number of learners and institutions, type of intervention, use of a comparison/control group, randomization, and strength of statistical analysis. Results: Of 655 articles, 54 (8%) met inclusion criteria. The majority (65%) reported experiences of 100 learners or fewer, and only one was multi-institutional. Only 46% used a comparison/control group. Statistical significance of results was not reported in 39%. None examined outcomes at a point distant from the educational intervention. Conclusions: Most studies describing pathology educational interventions are not of strong experimental design. Consumers of educational research should be cognizant of these potential weaknesses in educational studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)775-781
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican journal of clinical pathology
Volume152
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 4 2019

Fingerprint

Pathology
Education
Control Groups
Random Allocation
Medical Students
Research Design
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Research

Keywords

  • Education
  • Evidence-based teaching
  • Medical students
  • Review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this

McBrien, S., Bailey, Z., Ryder, J., Scholer, P., & Talmon, G. (2019). Improving Outcomes. American journal of clinical pathology, 152(6), 775-781. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqz100

Improving Outcomes. / McBrien, Sarah; Bailey, Zachary; Ryder, Jonathan; Scholer, Paige; Talmon, Geoffrey.

In: American journal of clinical pathology, Vol. 152, No. 6, 04.11.2019, p. 775-781.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McBrien, S, Bailey, Z, Ryder, J, Scholer, P & Talmon, G 2019, 'Improving Outcomes', American journal of clinical pathology, vol. 152, no. 6, pp. 775-781. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqz100
McBrien S, Bailey Z, Ryder J, Scholer P, Talmon G. Improving Outcomes. American journal of clinical pathology. 2019 Nov 4;152(6):775-781. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqz100
McBrien, Sarah ; Bailey, Zachary ; Ryder, Jonathan ; Scholer, Paige ; Talmon, Geoffrey. / Improving Outcomes. In: American journal of clinical pathology. 2019 ; Vol. 152, No. 6. pp. 775-781.
@article{32db83fc1c6e4174be38e97ca1fde5d8,
title = "Improving Outcomes",
abstract = "Objectives: To determine the strength of study design and outcomes in literature describing pathology education for medical students. Methods: A search was conducted for articles related to pathology education published over 45 years describing an educational intervention. The primary data collected included phase of education, domain of objectives, number of learners and institutions, type of intervention, use of a comparison/control group, randomization, and strength of statistical analysis. Results: Of 655 articles, 54 (8{\%}) met inclusion criteria. The majority (65{\%}) reported experiences of 100 learners or fewer, and only one was multi-institutional. Only 46{\%} used a comparison/control group. Statistical significance of results was not reported in 39{\%}. None examined outcomes at a point distant from the educational intervention. Conclusions: Most studies describing pathology educational interventions are not of strong experimental design. Consumers of educational research should be cognizant of these potential weaknesses in educational studies.",
keywords = "Education, Evidence-based teaching, Medical students, Review",
author = "Sarah McBrien and Zachary Bailey and Jonathan Ryder and Paige Scholer and Geoffrey Talmon",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1093/ajcp/aqz100",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "152",
pages = "775--781",
journal = "American Journal of Clinical Pathology",
issn = "0002-9173",
publisher = "American Society of Clinical Pathologists",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving Outcomes

AU - McBrien, Sarah

AU - Bailey, Zachary

AU - Ryder, Jonathan

AU - Scholer, Paige

AU - Talmon, Geoffrey

PY - 2019/11/4

Y1 - 2019/11/4

N2 - Objectives: To determine the strength of study design and outcomes in literature describing pathology education for medical students. Methods: A search was conducted for articles related to pathology education published over 45 years describing an educational intervention. The primary data collected included phase of education, domain of objectives, number of learners and institutions, type of intervention, use of a comparison/control group, randomization, and strength of statistical analysis. Results: Of 655 articles, 54 (8%) met inclusion criteria. The majority (65%) reported experiences of 100 learners or fewer, and only one was multi-institutional. Only 46% used a comparison/control group. Statistical significance of results was not reported in 39%. None examined outcomes at a point distant from the educational intervention. Conclusions: Most studies describing pathology educational interventions are not of strong experimental design. Consumers of educational research should be cognizant of these potential weaknesses in educational studies.

AB - Objectives: To determine the strength of study design and outcomes in literature describing pathology education for medical students. Methods: A search was conducted for articles related to pathology education published over 45 years describing an educational intervention. The primary data collected included phase of education, domain of objectives, number of learners and institutions, type of intervention, use of a comparison/control group, randomization, and strength of statistical analysis. Results: Of 655 articles, 54 (8%) met inclusion criteria. The majority (65%) reported experiences of 100 learners or fewer, and only one was multi-institutional. Only 46% used a comparison/control group. Statistical significance of results was not reported in 39%. None examined outcomes at a point distant from the educational intervention. Conclusions: Most studies describing pathology educational interventions are not of strong experimental design. Consumers of educational research should be cognizant of these potential weaknesses in educational studies.

KW - Education

KW - Evidence-based teaching

KW - Medical students

KW - Review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074553475&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074553475&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/ajcp/aqz100

DO - 10.1093/ajcp/aqz100

M3 - Article

C2 - 31390654

AN - SCOPUS:85074553475

VL - 152

SP - 775

EP - 781

JO - American Journal of Clinical Pathology

JF - American Journal of Clinical Pathology

SN - 0002-9173

IS - 6

ER -