Improved transition preemption strategy for signalized intersections near at-grade railway grade crossing

Hanseon Cho, Laurence R Rilett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Because the prime objective of the current preemption methods for traffic signals located near highway-railroad grade crossings is to clear vehicles from the crossing, secondary objectives such as maximizing pedestrian safety and minimizing vehicle delay are given less consideration and are often ignored completely. Consequently, the state-of-the-practice traffic signal preemption strategies may result in pedestrian safety and efficiency problems at signalized intersections near highway-railroad grade crossings (IHRGCs). The state-of-the-art transition preemption strategy (TPS) algorithm was designed to reduce the probability that pedestrians would be endangered when the standard preemption was initiated by approaching trains. However, there is a possibility of failure because the algorithm is predicated on the assumption that train arrivals can be predicted with certainty. Given the fact that current architecture may not be adequate with respect to safety and efficiency, there is a definite need for research on how to improve traffic signal preemption strategies. In this paper, an improved transition preemption strategy (ITPS) that is specifically designed to improve intersection performance while maintaining or improving the current level of safety is developed. It was concluded that the ITPS algorithm improves the operation of IHRGCs with respect to control delay while simultaneously reducing the probability of pedestrian conflicts associated with the standard preemption method and the TPS algorithm.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)443-454
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Transportation Engineering
Volume133
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2007

Fingerprint

Crossings (pipe and cable)
Traffic signals
German Federal Railways
Railroads
Pedestrian safety
pedestrian
railroad
traffic
efficiency
performance

Keywords

  • Intersections
  • Railroad grade crossings
  • Traffic safety
  • Traffic signals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Transportation

Cite this

Improved transition preemption strategy for signalized intersections near at-grade railway grade crossing. / Cho, Hanseon; Rilett, Laurence R.

In: Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 133, No. 8, 01.08.2007, p. 443-454.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e0db4ea0674843b8addf073be332116d,
title = "Improved transition preemption strategy for signalized intersections near at-grade railway grade crossing",
abstract = "Because the prime objective of the current preemption methods for traffic signals located near highway-railroad grade crossings is to clear vehicles from the crossing, secondary objectives such as maximizing pedestrian safety and minimizing vehicle delay are given less consideration and are often ignored completely. Consequently, the state-of-the-practice traffic signal preemption strategies may result in pedestrian safety and efficiency problems at signalized intersections near highway-railroad grade crossings (IHRGCs). The state-of-the-art transition preemption strategy (TPS) algorithm was designed to reduce the probability that pedestrians would be endangered when the standard preemption was initiated by approaching trains. However, there is a possibility of failure because the algorithm is predicated on the assumption that train arrivals can be predicted with certainty. Given the fact that current architecture may not be adequate with respect to safety and efficiency, there is a definite need for research on how to improve traffic signal preemption strategies. In this paper, an improved transition preemption strategy (ITPS) that is specifically designed to improve intersection performance while maintaining or improving the current level of safety is developed. It was concluded that the ITPS algorithm improves the operation of IHRGCs with respect to control delay while simultaneously reducing the probability of pedestrian conflicts associated with the standard preemption method and the TPS algorithm.",
keywords = "Intersections, Railroad grade crossings, Traffic safety, Traffic signals",
author = "Hanseon Cho and Rilett, {Laurence R}",
year = "2007",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2007)133:8(443)",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "133",
pages = "443--454",
journal = "Transportation engineering journal of ASCE",
issn = "0733-947X",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improved transition preemption strategy for signalized intersections near at-grade railway grade crossing

AU - Cho, Hanseon

AU - Rilett, Laurence R

PY - 2007/8/1

Y1 - 2007/8/1

N2 - Because the prime objective of the current preemption methods for traffic signals located near highway-railroad grade crossings is to clear vehicles from the crossing, secondary objectives such as maximizing pedestrian safety and minimizing vehicle delay are given less consideration and are often ignored completely. Consequently, the state-of-the-practice traffic signal preemption strategies may result in pedestrian safety and efficiency problems at signalized intersections near highway-railroad grade crossings (IHRGCs). The state-of-the-art transition preemption strategy (TPS) algorithm was designed to reduce the probability that pedestrians would be endangered when the standard preemption was initiated by approaching trains. However, there is a possibility of failure because the algorithm is predicated on the assumption that train arrivals can be predicted with certainty. Given the fact that current architecture may not be adequate with respect to safety and efficiency, there is a definite need for research on how to improve traffic signal preemption strategies. In this paper, an improved transition preemption strategy (ITPS) that is specifically designed to improve intersection performance while maintaining or improving the current level of safety is developed. It was concluded that the ITPS algorithm improves the operation of IHRGCs with respect to control delay while simultaneously reducing the probability of pedestrian conflicts associated with the standard preemption method and the TPS algorithm.

AB - Because the prime objective of the current preemption methods for traffic signals located near highway-railroad grade crossings is to clear vehicles from the crossing, secondary objectives such as maximizing pedestrian safety and minimizing vehicle delay are given less consideration and are often ignored completely. Consequently, the state-of-the-practice traffic signal preemption strategies may result in pedestrian safety and efficiency problems at signalized intersections near highway-railroad grade crossings (IHRGCs). The state-of-the-art transition preemption strategy (TPS) algorithm was designed to reduce the probability that pedestrians would be endangered when the standard preemption was initiated by approaching trains. However, there is a possibility of failure because the algorithm is predicated on the assumption that train arrivals can be predicted with certainty. Given the fact that current architecture may not be adequate with respect to safety and efficiency, there is a definite need for research on how to improve traffic signal preemption strategies. In this paper, an improved transition preemption strategy (ITPS) that is specifically designed to improve intersection performance while maintaining or improving the current level of safety is developed. It was concluded that the ITPS algorithm improves the operation of IHRGCs with respect to control delay while simultaneously reducing the probability of pedestrian conflicts associated with the standard preemption method and the TPS algorithm.

KW - Intersections

KW - Railroad grade crossings

KW - Traffic safety

KW - Traffic signals

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34547134742&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34547134742&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2007)133:8(443)

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2007)133:8(443)

M3 - Article

VL - 133

SP - 443

EP - 454

JO - Transportation engineering journal of ASCE

JF - Transportation engineering journal of ASCE

SN - 0733-947X

IS - 8

ER -