Implications of the reflectivity-impulsivity dimension for special education

Michael H. Epstein, Daniel P. Hallahan, James M. Kauffman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The cognitive development of exceptional children has been a topic of discussion for many years. Cognitively based explanations for faulty academic and social performance, however, have not been forthcoming. A major problem has been that theorists and researchers alike have viewed cognition as a global process. Reliance upon standardized global intelligence tests for research data has contributed to the dilemma. Therefore, theories have been presented in universal terminology, and research has neglected many subtle differences among individuals. If special educators are to understand the cognitive processes of exceptional children, the search for global explanations of behavior must be attenuated and redirected toward the understanding of individual differences in cognition. The task can be accomplished by dissecting the process of cognition into smaller, more discrete units so that the dynamics of cognition can be observed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)11-25
Number of pages15
JournalThe Journal of Special Education
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1975

Fingerprint

Special Education
Impulsive Behavior
special education
Cognition
cognition
Exceptional Child
Individuality
intelligence test
Intelligence Tests
cognitive development
Research
Terminology
technical language
Research Personnel
educator
performance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Implications of the reflectivity-impulsivity dimension for special education. / Epstein, Michael H.; Hallahan, Daniel P.; Kauffman, James M.

In: The Journal of Special Education, Vol. 9, No. 1, 04.1975, p. 11-25.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Epstein, Michael H. ; Hallahan, Daniel P. ; Kauffman, James M. / Implications of the reflectivity-impulsivity dimension for special education. In: The Journal of Special Education. 1975 ; Vol. 9, No. 1. pp. 11-25.
@article{290224f131a8490d968ce35a6e17e9a8,
title = "Implications of the reflectivity-impulsivity dimension for special education",
abstract = "The cognitive development of exceptional children has been a topic of discussion for many years. Cognitively based explanations for faulty academic and social performance, however, have not been forthcoming. A major problem has been that theorists and researchers alike have viewed cognition as a global process. Reliance upon standardized global intelligence tests for research data has contributed to the dilemma. Therefore, theories have been presented in universal terminology, and research has neglected many subtle differences among individuals. If special educators are to understand the cognitive processes of exceptional children, the search for global explanations of behavior must be attenuated and redirected toward the understanding of individual differences in cognition. The task can be accomplished by dissecting the process of cognition into smaller, more discrete units so that the dynamics of cognition can be observed.",
author = "Epstein, {Michael H.} and Hallahan, {Daniel P.} and Kauffman, {James M.}",
year = "1975",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1177/002246697500900103",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "11--25",
journal = "Journal of Special Education",
issn = "0022-4669",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implications of the reflectivity-impulsivity dimension for special education

AU - Epstein, Michael H.

AU - Hallahan, Daniel P.

AU - Kauffman, James M.

PY - 1975/4

Y1 - 1975/4

N2 - The cognitive development of exceptional children has been a topic of discussion for many years. Cognitively based explanations for faulty academic and social performance, however, have not been forthcoming. A major problem has been that theorists and researchers alike have viewed cognition as a global process. Reliance upon standardized global intelligence tests for research data has contributed to the dilemma. Therefore, theories have been presented in universal terminology, and research has neglected many subtle differences among individuals. If special educators are to understand the cognitive processes of exceptional children, the search for global explanations of behavior must be attenuated and redirected toward the understanding of individual differences in cognition. The task can be accomplished by dissecting the process of cognition into smaller, more discrete units so that the dynamics of cognition can be observed.

AB - The cognitive development of exceptional children has been a topic of discussion for many years. Cognitively based explanations for faulty academic and social performance, however, have not been forthcoming. A major problem has been that theorists and researchers alike have viewed cognition as a global process. Reliance upon standardized global intelligence tests for research data has contributed to the dilemma. Therefore, theories have been presented in universal terminology, and research has neglected many subtle differences among individuals. If special educators are to understand the cognitive processes of exceptional children, the search for global explanations of behavior must be attenuated and redirected toward the understanding of individual differences in cognition. The task can be accomplished by dissecting the process of cognition into smaller, more discrete units so that the dynamics of cognition can be observed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84970417674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84970417674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/002246697500900103

DO - 10.1177/002246697500900103

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84970417674

VL - 9

SP - 11

EP - 25

JO - Journal of Special Education

JF - Journal of Special Education

SN - 0022-4669

IS - 1

ER -