Implementation of a rapid chest pain protocol in the emergency department: A quality improvement project

Azalea Marie Bunch, A. Renee Leasure, Cathrin Carithers, Robert E. Burnette, Michael Scott Berryman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Abstract: Purpose: The purpose of this quality improvement (QI) project is to compare the effectiveness of a rapid 90-min chest pain screening and evaluation protocol to a 120-min screening and evaluation protocol in determining patient readiness for hospital admission or discharge home. Data Sources: The existing chest pain protocol utilized in the emergency department (ED) was revised based on a review of current research changing initial screening and reevaluation times from 120 to 90 min. A prospective comparative study of patients presenting to the ED with chest pain was performed comparing the existing chest pain protocol of 120 min (standard care) with a rapid screening evaluation protocol of 90 min. A total of 128 patients presenting to an ED in Texas with chest pain comprised the sample for this study. Conclusions: There was a significant difference in the number of minutes between the groups for readiness for disposition. The average time from chest pain evaluation to readiness for disposition home, observation, or admission decreased from an average of 191 min in the standard care group to an average of 118 min in the rapid screening group. Implications for practice: Use of the rapid screening and evaluation protocol decreased the time to disposition by an average of 73 min, which enhanced ED flow without influencing disposition and patient safety.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)75-83
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners
Volume28
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Quality Improvement
Chest Pain
Hospital Emergency Service
Information Storage and Retrieval
Patient Safety
Observation
Prospective Studies
Research

Keywords

  • Cardiac biomarkers
  • Chest pain
  • Emergency department
  • Protocol
  • Quality improvement
  • Screening

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Implementation of a rapid chest pain protocol in the emergency department : A quality improvement project. / Bunch, Azalea Marie; Leasure, A. Renee; Carithers, Cathrin; Burnette, Robert E.; Berryman, Michael Scott.

In: Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, Vol. 28, No. 2, 01.02.2016, p. 75-83.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bunch, Azalea Marie ; Leasure, A. Renee ; Carithers, Cathrin ; Burnette, Robert E. ; Berryman, Michael Scott. / Implementation of a rapid chest pain protocol in the emergency department : A quality improvement project. In: Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners. 2016 ; Vol. 28, No. 2. pp. 75-83.
@article{c4982f29a53e4f54a911b06c6a3caae2,
title = "Implementation of a rapid chest pain protocol in the emergency department: A quality improvement project",
abstract = "Abstract: Purpose: The purpose of this quality improvement (QI) project is to compare the effectiveness of a rapid 90-min chest pain screening and evaluation protocol to a 120-min screening and evaluation protocol in determining patient readiness for hospital admission or discharge home. Data Sources: The existing chest pain protocol utilized in the emergency department (ED) was revised based on a review of current research changing initial screening and reevaluation times from 120 to 90 min. A prospective comparative study of patients presenting to the ED with chest pain was performed comparing the existing chest pain protocol of 120 min (standard care) with a rapid screening evaluation protocol of 90 min. A total of 128 patients presenting to an ED in Texas with chest pain comprised the sample for this study. Conclusions: There was a significant difference in the number of minutes between the groups for readiness for disposition. The average time from chest pain evaluation to readiness for disposition home, observation, or admission decreased from an average of 191 min in the standard care group to an average of 118 min in the rapid screening group. Implications for practice: Use of the rapid screening and evaluation protocol decreased the time to disposition by an average of 73 min, which enhanced ED flow without influencing disposition and patient safety.",
keywords = "Cardiac biomarkers, Chest pain, Emergency department, Protocol, Quality improvement, Screening",
author = "Bunch, {Azalea Marie} and Leasure, {A. Renee} and Cathrin Carithers and Burnette, {Robert E.} and Berryman, {Michael Scott}",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/2327-6924.12260",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "75--83",
journal = "Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners",
issn = "2327-6886",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementation of a rapid chest pain protocol in the emergency department

T2 - A quality improvement project

AU - Bunch, Azalea Marie

AU - Leasure, A. Renee

AU - Carithers, Cathrin

AU - Burnette, Robert E.

AU - Berryman, Michael Scott

PY - 2016/2/1

Y1 - 2016/2/1

N2 - Abstract: Purpose: The purpose of this quality improvement (QI) project is to compare the effectiveness of a rapid 90-min chest pain screening and evaluation protocol to a 120-min screening and evaluation protocol in determining patient readiness for hospital admission or discharge home. Data Sources: The existing chest pain protocol utilized in the emergency department (ED) was revised based on a review of current research changing initial screening and reevaluation times from 120 to 90 min. A prospective comparative study of patients presenting to the ED with chest pain was performed comparing the existing chest pain protocol of 120 min (standard care) with a rapid screening evaluation protocol of 90 min. A total of 128 patients presenting to an ED in Texas with chest pain comprised the sample for this study. Conclusions: There was a significant difference in the number of minutes between the groups for readiness for disposition. The average time from chest pain evaluation to readiness for disposition home, observation, or admission decreased from an average of 191 min in the standard care group to an average of 118 min in the rapid screening group. Implications for practice: Use of the rapid screening and evaluation protocol decreased the time to disposition by an average of 73 min, which enhanced ED flow without influencing disposition and patient safety.

AB - Abstract: Purpose: The purpose of this quality improvement (QI) project is to compare the effectiveness of a rapid 90-min chest pain screening and evaluation protocol to a 120-min screening and evaluation protocol in determining patient readiness for hospital admission or discharge home. Data Sources: The existing chest pain protocol utilized in the emergency department (ED) was revised based on a review of current research changing initial screening and reevaluation times from 120 to 90 min. A prospective comparative study of patients presenting to the ED with chest pain was performed comparing the existing chest pain protocol of 120 min (standard care) with a rapid screening evaluation protocol of 90 min. A total of 128 patients presenting to an ED in Texas with chest pain comprised the sample for this study. Conclusions: There was a significant difference in the number of minutes between the groups for readiness for disposition. The average time from chest pain evaluation to readiness for disposition home, observation, or admission decreased from an average of 191 min in the standard care group to an average of 118 min in the rapid screening group. Implications for practice: Use of the rapid screening and evaluation protocol decreased the time to disposition by an average of 73 min, which enhanced ED flow without influencing disposition and patient safety.

KW - Cardiac biomarkers

KW - Chest pain

KW - Emergency department

KW - Protocol

KW - Quality improvement

KW - Screening

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84956752321&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84956752321&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/2327-6924.12260

DO - 10.1002/2327-6924.12260

M3 - Article

C2 - 25946652

AN - SCOPUS:84956752321

VL - 28

SP - 75

EP - 83

JO - Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners

JF - Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners

SN - 2327-6886

IS - 2

ER -