Impact performance of W-beam guardrail installed at various flare rates

John D. Reid, Beau D. Kuipers, Dean L. Sicking, Ron Faller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The potential to increase suggested flare rates for strong post, W-beam guardrail systems and thus reduce guardrail installation lengths is investigated. This reduction in length would result in decreased guardrail construction and maintenance costs, and reduce impact frequency. If the W-beam guardrail can withstand the higher impact angles, with only modest increases in accident severity, total accident costs can be reduced. Computer simulation and five full-scale crash tests were completed to evaluate increased flare rates up to, and including, 5:1. Computer simulations indicated that conventional G4(1S) guardrail modified to incorporate a routed wood block could not successfully meet NCHRP Report 350 crash test criteria when installed at any steeper flare rates than the 15:1 recommended in the Roadside Design Guide. However, computer modeling and full-scale crash testing showed that the Midwest Guardrail System (MGS) could meet NCHRP Report 350 impact criteria when installed at a 5:1 flare rate. Impact severities during testing were found to be greater than intended, yet the MGS passed all NCHRP 350 requirements. Hence, flaring the MGS guardrail as much as 5:1 will still provide acceptable safety performance for the full range of passenger vehicles. Increasing guardrail flare rates will reduce the overall number of guardrail crashes without significantly increasing risks of injury or fatality during the remaining crashes. Therefore, it is recommended that, whenever roadside topography permits, flare rates should be increased to as high as 5:1 when using the MGS.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)476-485
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Impact Engineering
Volume36
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2009

Fingerprint

Roadsides
Accidents
Computer simulation
Testing
Topography
Costs
Wood

Keywords

  • Crash analysis
  • Flare rates
  • Roadside safety
  • W-beam guardrail

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Automotive Engineering
  • Aerospace Engineering
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Ocean Engineering
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Mechanical Engineering

Cite this

Impact performance of W-beam guardrail installed at various flare rates. / Reid, John D.; Kuipers, Beau D.; Sicking, Dean L.; Faller, Ron.

In: International Journal of Impact Engineering, Vol. 36, No. 3, 01.03.2009, p. 476-485.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Reid, John D. ; Kuipers, Beau D. ; Sicking, Dean L. ; Faller, Ron. / Impact performance of W-beam guardrail installed at various flare rates. In: International Journal of Impact Engineering. 2009 ; Vol. 36, No. 3. pp. 476-485.
@article{fcaeaa1abbee464ab8d0ed635338ddf8,
title = "Impact performance of W-beam guardrail installed at various flare rates",
abstract = "The potential to increase suggested flare rates for strong post, W-beam guardrail systems and thus reduce guardrail installation lengths is investigated. This reduction in length would result in decreased guardrail construction and maintenance costs, and reduce impact frequency. If the W-beam guardrail can withstand the higher impact angles, with only modest increases in accident severity, total accident costs can be reduced. Computer simulation and five full-scale crash tests were completed to evaluate increased flare rates up to, and including, 5:1. Computer simulations indicated that conventional G4(1S) guardrail modified to incorporate a routed wood block could not successfully meet NCHRP Report 350 crash test criteria when installed at any steeper flare rates than the 15:1 recommended in the Roadside Design Guide. However, computer modeling and full-scale crash testing showed that the Midwest Guardrail System (MGS) could meet NCHRP Report 350 impact criteria when installed at a 5:1 flare rate. Impact severities during testing were found to be greater than intended, yet the MGS passed all NCHRP 350 requirements. Hence, flaring the MGS guardrail as much as 5:1 will still provide acceptable safety performance for the full range of passenger vehicles. Increasing guardrail flare rates will reduce the overall number of guardrail crashes without significantly increasing risks of injury or fatality during the remaining crashes. Therefore, it is recommended that, whenever roadside topography permits, flare rates should be increased to as high as 5:1 when using the MGS.",
keywords = "Crash analysis, Flare rates, Roadside safety, W-beam guardrail",
author = "Reid, {John D.} and Kuipers, {Beau D.} and Sicking, {Dean L.} and Ron Faller",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.08.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "476--485",
journal = "International Journal of Impact Engineering",
issn = "0734-743X",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact performance of W-beam guardrail installed at various flare rates

AU - Reid, John D.

AU - Kuipers, Beau D.

AU - Sicking, Dean L.

AU - Faller, Ron

PY - 2009/3/1

Y1 - 2009/3/1

N2 - The potential to increase suggested flare rates for strong post, W-beam guardrail systems and thus reduce guardrail installation lengths is investigated. This reduction in length would result in decreased guardrail construction and maintenance costs, and reduce impact frequency. If the W-beam guardrail can withstand the higher impact angles, with only modest increases in accident severity, total accident costs can be reduced. Computer simulation and five full-scale crash tests were completed to evaluate increased flare rates up to, and including, 5:1. Computer simulations indicated that conventional G4(1S) guardrail modified to incorporate a routed wood block could not successfully meet NCHRP Report 350 crash test criteria when installed at any steeper flare rates than the 15:1 recommended in the Roadside Design Guide. However, computer modeling and full-scale crash testing showed that the Midwest Guardrail System (MGS) could meet NCHRP Report 350 impact criteria when installed at a 5:1 flare rate. Impact severities during testing were found to be greater than intended, yet the MGS passed all NCHRP 350 requirements. Hence, flaring the MGS guardrail as much as 5:1 will still provide acceptable safety performance for the full range of passenger vehicles. Increasing guardrail flare rates will reduce the overall number of guardrail crashes without significantly increasing risks of injury or fatality during the remaining crashes. Therefore, it is recommended that, whenever roadside topography permits, flare rates should be increased to as high as 5:1 when using the MGS.

AB - The potential to increase suggested flare rates for strong post, W-beam guardrail systems and thus reduce guardrail installation lengths is investigated. This reduction in length would result in decreased guardrail construction and maintenance costs, and reduce impact frequency. If the W-beam guardrail can withstand the higher impact angles, with only modest increases in accident severity, total accident costs can be reduced. Computer simulation and five full-scale crash tests were completed to evaluate increased flare rates up to, and including, 5:1. Computer simulations indicated that conventional G4(1S) guardrail modified to incorporate a routed wood block could not successfully meet NCHRP Report 350 crash test criteria when installed at any steeper flare rates than the 15:1 recommended in the Roadside Design Guide. However, computer modeling and full-scale crash testing showed that the Midwest Guardrail System (MGS) could meet NCHRP Report 350 impact criteria when installed at a 5:1 flare rate. Impact severities during testing were found to be greater than intended, yet the MGS passed all NCHRP 350 requirements. Hence, flaring the MGS guardrail as much as 5:1 will still provide acceptable safety performance for the full range of passenger vehicles. Increasing guardrail flare rates will reduce the overall number of guardrail crashes without significantly increasing risks of injury or fatality during the remaining crashes. Therefore, it is recommended that, whenever roadside topography permits, flare rates should be increased to as high as 5:1 when using the MGS.

KW - Crash analysis

KW - Flare rates

KW - Roadside safety

KW - W-beam guardrail

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57749172253&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57749172253&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.08.006

DO - 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.08.006

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 476

EP - 485

JO - International Journal of Impact Engineering

JF - International Journal of Impact Engineering

SN - 0734-743X

IS - 3

ER -