Impact of palatal prosthodontic intervention on communication performance of patients' maxillectomy defects: A multilevel outcome study

Marsha Sullivan, Carol Gaebler, David Beukelman, Gordon Mahanna, Julie Ann Marshall, Daniel Lydiatt, William M. Lydiatt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Obturators have been developed for surgical defects caused by cancer of the maxillary sinus and alveolar ridge. Outcome research is necessary to develop evidence-based practice guidelines. Methods. Thirty-two consecutively treated maxillectomy patients seen in the Facial Prosthetics Clinic at UNMC from 1994 through 1996 had their defects obturated for 1 month when speech intelligibility, speaking rate, nasality, and communication effectiveness were measured. Results. With the obturator removed, mean speech intelligibility was 61%, speaking rate was 138 words per minute, and nasality was rated as 5.8 on a 0-7 point scale. With the obturator inserted, mean speech intelligibility was 94%, speaking rate was 164 words per minute, and nasality was rated as 1.6. The mean self-perception of communication effectiveness was 75% of what it was before the diagnosis of cancer. Conclusions. Obturation is an effective intervention for defects of the maxillary sinus and alveolar ridge on speech performance. Variations in effectiveness were noted based on site of defect and patient satisfaction with the intervention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)530-538
Number of pages9
JournalHead and Neck
Volume24
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 8 2002

Fingerprint

Speech Intelligibility
Prosthodontics
Alveolar Process
Communication
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Maxillary Sinus Neoplasms
Maxillary Sinus
Evidence-Based Practice
Patient Satisfaction
Practice Guidelines
Self Concept
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • Communication
  • Maxillofacial prosthodontics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Impact of palatal prosthodontic intervention on communication performance of patients' maxillectomy defects : A multilevel outcome study. / Sullivan, Marsha; Gaebler, Carol; Beukelman, David; Mahanna, Gordon; Marshall, Julie Ann; Lydiatt, Daniel; Lydiatt, William M.

In: Head and Neck, Vol. 24, No. 6, 08.06.2002, p. 530-538.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sullivan, Marsha ; Gaebler, Carol ; Beukelman, David ; Mahanna, Gordon ; Marshall, Julie Ann ; Lydiatt, Daniel ; Lydiatt, William M. / Impact of palatal prosthodontic intervention on communication performance of patients' maxillectomy defects : A multilevel outcome study. In: Head and Neck. 2002 ; Vol. 24, No. 6. pp. 530-538.
@article{29350d273af544a0a0402556179912be,
title = "Impact of palatal prosthodontic intervention on communication performance of patients' maxillectomy defects: A multilevel outcome study",
abstract = "Background. Obturators have been developed for surgical defects caused by cancer of the maxillary sinus and alveolar ridge. Outcome research is necessary to develop evidence-based practice guidelines. Methods. Thirty-two consecutively treated maxillectomy patients seen in the Facial Prosthetics Clinic at UNMC from 1994 through 1996 had their defects obturated for 1 month when speech intelligibility, speaking rate, nasality, and communication effectiveness were measured. Results. With the obturator removed, mean speech intelligibility was 61{\%}, speaking rate was 138 words per minute, and nasality was rated as 5.8 on a 0-7 point scale. With the obturator inserted, mean speech intelligibility was 94{\%}, speaking rate was 164 words per minute, and nasality was rated as 1.6. The mean self-perception of communication effectiveness was 75{\%} of what it was before the diagnosis of cancer. Conclusions. Obturation is an effective intervention for defects of the maxillary sinus and alveolar ridge on speech performance. Variations in effectiveness were noted based on site of defect and patient satisfaction with the intervention.",
keywords = "Cancer, Communication, Maxillofacial prosthodontics",
author = "Marsha Sullivan and Carol Gaebler and David Beukelman and Gordon Mahanna and Marshall, {Julie Ann} and Daniel Lydiatt and Lydiatt, {William M.}",
year = "2002",
month = "6",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1002/hed.10095",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "530--538",
journal = "Head and Neck",
issn = "1043-3074",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of palatal prosthodontic intervention on communication performance of patients' maxillectomy defects

T2 - A multilevel outcome study

AU - Sullivan, Marsha

AU - Gaebler, Carol

AU - Beukelman, David

AU - Mahanna, Gordon

AU - Marshall, Julie Ann

AU - Lydiatt, Daniel

AU - Lydiatt, William M.

PY - 2002/6/8

Y1 - 2002/6/8

N2 - Background. Obturators have been developed for surgical defects caused by cancer of the maxillary sinus and alveolar ridge. Outcome research is necessary to develop evidence-based practice guidelines. Methods. Thirty-two consecutively treated maxillectomy patients seen in the Facial Prosthetics Clinic at UNMC from 1994 through 1996 had their defects obturated for 1 month when speech intelligibility, speaking rate, nasality, and communication effectiveness were measured. Results. With the obturator removed, mean speech intelligibility was 61%, speaking rate was 138 words per minute, and nasality was rated as 5.8 on a 0-7 point scale. With the obturator inserted, mean speech intelligibility was 94%, speaking rate was 164 words per minute, and nasality was rated as 1.6. The mean self-perception of communication effectiveness was 75% of what it was before the diagnosis of cancer. Conclusions. Obturation is an effective intervention for defects of the maxillary sinus and alveolar ridge on speech performance. Variations in effectiveness were noted based on site of defect and patient satisfaction with the intervention.

AB - Background. Obturators have been developed for surgical defects caused by cancer of the maxillary sinus and alveolar ridge. Outcome research is necessary to develop evidence-based practice guidelines. Methods. Thirty-two consecutively treated maxillectomy patients seen in the Facial Prosthetics Clinic at UNMC from 1994 through 1996 had their defects obturated for 1 month when speech intelligibility, speaking rate, nasality, and communication effectiveness were measured. Results. With the obturator removed, mean speech intelligibility was 61%, speaking rate was 138 words per minute, and nasality was rated as 5.8 on a 0-7 point scale. With the obturator inserted, mean speech intelligibility was 94%, speaking rate was 164 words per minute, and nasality was rated as 1.6. The mean self-perception of communication effectiveness was 75% of what it was before the diagnosis of cancer. Conclusions. Obturation is an effective intervention for defects of the maxillary sinus and alveolar ridge on speech performance. Variations in effectiveness were noted based on site of defect and patient satisfaction with the intervention.

KW - Cancer

KW - Communication

KW - Maxillofacial prosthodontics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036260432&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036260432&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/hed.10095

DO - 10.1002/hed.10095

M3 - Article

C2 - 12112549

AN - SCOPUS:0036260432

VL - 24

SP - 530

EP - 538

JO - Head and Neck

JF - Head and Neck

SN - 1043-3074

IS - 6

ER -