If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail: Operationalization matters

Christina R. Steidl, Regina Werum

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Operationalization has been the focus of less research than many other methodological topics. In this article, we argue that considering operational decisions is particularly critical for those who study stratification, because measures of inequality often involve multiple layers of operationalization: researchers first decide how to assign individuals to social groups (e.g., race), which are then themselves used to construct measures of group-level differences and inequality (e.g., racial segregation). We provide examples of this by drawing on contemporary debates about how to operationalize social groups based on class, race, gender, and religion. Then we discuss three examples (religion, racial segregation, and family type) of second layer operationalization decisions, focusing on the consequences of operational decisions for research findings. We conclude by discussing the broader implications of operational decisions, focusing particularly on issues of power and applications for policy makers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere12727
JournalSociology Compass
Volume13
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

operationalization
segregation
Religion
gender
Group

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail : Operationalization matters. / Steidl, Christina R.; Werum, Regina.

In: Sociology Compass, Vol. 13, No. 8, e12727, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a98bb403d6fe4f9ca5a911c133d77157,
title = "If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail: Operationalization matters",
abstract = "Operationalization has been the focus of less research than many other methodological topics. In this article, we argue that considering operational decisions is particularly critical for those who study stratification, because measures of inequality often involve multiple layers of operationalization: researchers first decide how to assign individuals to social groups (e.g., race), which are then themselves used to construct measures of group-level differences and inequality (e.g., racial segregation). We provide examples of this by drawing on contemporary debates about how to operationalize social groups based on class, race, gender, and religion. Then we discuss three examples (religion, racial segregation, and family type) of second layer operationalization decisions, focusing on the consequences of operational decisions for research findings. We conclude by discussing the broader implications of operational decisions, focusing particularly on issues of power and applications for policy makers.",
author = "Steidl, {Christina R.} and Regina Werum",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/soc4.12727",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
journal = "Sociology Compass",
issn = "1751-9020",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail

T2 - Operationalization matters

AU - Steidl, Christina R.

AU - Werum, Regina

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Operationalization has been the focus of less research than many other methodological topics. In this article, we argue that considering operational decisions is particularly critical for those who study stratification, because measures of inequality often involve multiple layers of operationalization: researchers first decide how to assign individuals to social groups (e.g., race), which are then themselves used to construct measures of group-level differences and inequality (e.g., racial segregation). We provide examples of this by drawing on contemporary debates about how to operationalize social groups based on class, race, gender, and religion. Then we discuss three examples (religion, racial segregation, and family type) of second layer operationalization decisions, focusing on the consequences of operational decisions for research findings. We conclude by discussing the broader implications of operational decisions, focusing particularly on issues of power and applications for policy makers.

AB - Operationalization has been the focus of less research than many other methodological topics. In this article, we argue that considering operational decisions is particularly critical for those who study stratification, because measures of inequality often involve multiple layers of operationalization: researchers first decide how to assign individuals to social groups (e.g., race), which are then themselves used to construct measures of group-level differences and inequality (e.g., racial segregation). We provide examples of this by drawing on contemporary debates about how to operationalize social groups based on class, race, gender, and religion. Then we discuss three examples (religion, racial segregation, and family type) of second layer operationalization decisions, focusing on the consequences of operational decisions for research findings. We conclude by discussing the broader implications of operational decisions, focusing particularly on issues of power and applications for policy makers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069890992&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069890992&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/soc4.12727

DO - 10.1111/soc4.12727

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85069890992

VL - 13

JO - Sociology Compass

JF - Sociology Compass

SN - 1751-9020

IS - 8

M1 - e12727

ER -