Identifying potential conflict associated with oil and gas exploration in Texas state coastal waters: A multicriteria spatial analysis

Samuel D. Brody, Himanshu Grover, Sarah Bernhardt, Zhenghong Tang, Bianca Whitaker, Colin Spence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent interest in expanding offshore oil production within waters of the United States has been met with opposition by groups concerned with recreational, environmental, and aesthetic values associated with the coastal zone. Although the proposition of new oil platforms off the coast has generated conflict over how coastal resources should be utilized, little research has been conducted on where these user conflicts might be most intense and which sites might be most suitable for locating oil production facilities in light of the multiple, and often times, competing interests. In this article, we develop a multiple-criteria spatial decision support tool that identifies the potential degree of conflict associated with oil and gas production activities for existing lease tracts in the coastal margin of Texas. We use geographic information systems to measure and map a range of potentially competing representative values impacted by establishing energy extraction infrastructure and then spatially identify which leased tracts are the least contentious sites for oil and gas production in Texas state waters. Visual and statistical results indicate that oil and gas lease blocks within the study area vary in their potential to generate conflict among multiple stakeholders.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)597-617
Number of pages21
JournalEnvironmental Management
Volume38
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2006

Fingerprint

spatial analysis
oil production
coastal water
Oils
Gases
Water
oil
gas
gas production
oil platform
Coastal zones
esthetics
coastal zone
stakeholder
infrastructure
water
Geographic information systems
conflict
coast
resource

Keywords

  • Geographic information systems
  • Oil and gas
  • Site suitability
  • Texas, coastal

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Ecology
  • Pollution

Cite this

Identifying potential conflict associated with oil and gas exploration in Texas state coastal waters : A multicriteria spatial analysis. / Brody, Samuel D.; Grover, Himanshu; Bernhardt, Sarah; Tang, Zhenghong; Whitaker, Bianca; Spence, Colin.

In: Environmental Management, Vol. 38, No. 4, 01.10.2006, p. 597-617.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brody, Samuel D. ; Grover, Himanshu ; Bernhardt, Sarah ; Tang, Zhenghong ; Whitaker, Bianca ; Spence, Colin. / Identifying potential conflict associated with oil and gas exploration in Texas state coastal waters : A multicriteria spatial analysis. In: Environmental Management. 2006 ; Vol. 38, No. 4. pp. 597-617.
@article{82d105cfd44d48da967b0195f3386234,
title = "Identifying potential conflict associated with oil and gas exploration in Texas state coastal waters: A multicriteria spatial analysis",
abstract = "Recent interest in expanding offshore oil production within waters of the United States has been met with opposition by groups concerned with recreational, environmental, and aesthetic values associated with the coastal zone. Although the proposition of new oil platforms off the coast has generated conflict over how coastal resources should be utilized, little research has been conducted on where these user conflicts might be most intense and which sites might be most suitable for locating oil production facilities in light of the multiple, and often times, competing interests. In this article, we develop a multiple-criteria spatial decision support tool that identifies the potential degree of conflict associated with oil and gas production activities for existing lease tracts in the coastal margin of Texas. We use geographic information systems to measure and map a range of potentially competing representative values impacted by establishing energy extraction infrastructure and then spatially identify which leased tracts are the least contentious sites for oil and gas production in Texas state waters. Visual and statistical results indicate that oil and gas lease blocks within the study area vary in their potential to generate conflict among multiple stakeholders.",
keywords = "Geographic information systems, Oil and gas, Site suitability, Texas, coastal",
author = "Brody, {Samuel D.} and Himanshu Grover and Sarah Bernhardt and Zhenghong Tang and Bianca Whitaker and Colin Spence",
year = "2006",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00267-005-0265-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "597--617",
journal = "Environmental Management",
issn = "0364-152X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying potential conflict associated with oil and gas exploration in Texas state coastal waters

T2 - A multicriteria spatial analysis

AU - Brody, Samuel D.

AU - Grover, Himanshu

AU - Bernhardt, Sarah

AU - Tang, Zhenghong

AU - Whitaker, Bianca

AU - Spence, Colin

PY - 2006/10/1

Y1 - 2006/10/1

N2 - Recent interest in expanding offshore oil production within waters of the United States has been met with opposition by groups concerned with recreational, environmental, and aesthetic values associated with the coastal zone. Although the proposition of new oil platforms off the coast has generated conflict over how coastal resources should be utilized, little research has been conducted on where these user conflicts might be most intense and which sites might be most suitable for locating oil production facilities in light of the multiple, and often times, competing interests. In this article, we develop a multiple-criteria spatial decision support tool that identifies the potential degree of conflict associated with oil and gas production activities for existing lease tracts in the coastal margin of Texas. We use geographic information systems to measure and map a range of potentially competing representative values impacted by establishing energy extraction infrastructure and then spatially identify which leased tracts are the least contentious sites for oil and gas production in Texas state waters. Visual and statistical results indicate that oil and gas lease blocks within the study area vary in their potential to generate conflict among multiple stakeholders.

AB - Recent interest in expanding offshore oil production within waters of the United States has been met with opposition by groups concerned with recreational, environmental, and aesthetic values associated with the coastal zone. Although the proposition of new oil platforms off the coast has generated conflict over how coastal resources should be utilized, little research has been conducted on where these user conflicts might be most intense and which sites might be most suitable for locating oil production facilities in light of the multiple, and often times, competing interests. In this article, we develop a multiple-criteria spatial decision support tool that identifies the potential degree of conflict associated with oil and gas production activities for existing lease tracts in the coastal margin of Texas. We use geographic information systems to measure and map a range of potentially competing representative values impacted by establishing energy extraction infrastructure and then spatially identify which leased tracts are the least contentious sites for oil and gas production in Texas state waters. Visual and statistical results indicate that oil and gas lease blocks within the study area vary in their potential to generate conflict among multiple stakeholders.

KW - Geographic information systems

KW - Oil and gas

KW - Site suitability

KW - Texas, coastal

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748973763&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748973763&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00267-005-0265-4

DO - 10.1007/s00267-005-0265-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 16933080

AN - SCOPUS:33748973763

VL - 38

SP - 597

EP - 617

JO - Environmental Management

JF - Environmental Management

SN - 0364-152X

IS - 4

ER -