Identifying clinical scholarship guidelines for faculty practice

Kathryn Fiandt, Kathleen Barr, Gail Hille, Peggy L Pelish, Bunny Pozehl, Polly Hulme, Susan Muhlbauer, Stephanie Burge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Clear descriptors of faculty practice and scholarly activities are essential to precisely demonstrate that the faculty practice role meets the standards of academic advancement and to influence academic policy. A description of scholarly clinical activities (1) justifies the benefits of faculty practice by means other than fiscal, (2) provides data for research regarding faculty practice, and (3) provides data to support the nursing profession's political, social, and health care agendas. Guidelines for clinical scholarship are described in this article. A review of relevant literature demonstrates that these guidelines go beyond current models by describing 24 scholarly activities organized into 4 areas: quality, governance, leadership, and knowledge development. Three years of data describing the scholarly activities of a college of nursing faculty engaged in practice are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the indicators in achieving these goals. These data can provide valuable information for trend analysis and, through heightened awareness of opportunities, increase faculty clinical scholarship activities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)147-155
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Professional Nursing
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2004

Fingerprint

Practice Guidelines
Guidelines
Nursing Faculties
Nursing
Delivery of Health Care
Research

Keywords

  • Academic nursing practice
  • Clinical scholarship
  • Faculty practice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Identifying clinical scholarship guidelines for faculty practice. / Fiandt, Kathryn; Barr, Kathleen; Hille, Gail; Pelish, Peggy L; Pozehl, Bunny; Hulme, Polly; Muhlbauer, Susan; Burge, Stephanie.

In: Journal of Professional Nursing, Vol. 20, No. 3, 01.05.2004, p. 147-155.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fiandt, Kathryn ; Barr, Kathleen ; Hille, Gail ; Pelish, Peggy L ; Pozehl, Bunny ; Hulme, Polly ; Muhlbauer, Susan ; Burge, Stephanie. / Identifying clinical scholarship guidelines for faculty practice. In: Journal of Professional Nursing. 2004 ; Vol. 20, No. 3. pp. 147-155.
@article{e0cc8c3ea05749a89db2c12bfb9a5f00,
title = "Identifying clinical scholarship guidelines for faculty practice",
abstract = "Clear descriptors of faculty practice and scholarly activities are essential to precisely demonstrate that the faculty practice role meets the standards of academic advancement and to influence academic policy. A description of scholarly clinical activities (1) justifies the benefits of faculty practice by means other than fiscal, (2) provides data for research regarding faculty practice, and (3) provides data to support the nursing profession's political, social, and health care agendas. Guidelines for clinical scholarship are described in this article. A review of relevant literature demonstrates that these guidelines go beyond current models by describing 24 scholarly activities organized into 4 areas: quality, governance, leadership, and knowledge development. Three years of data describing the scholarly activities of a college of nursing faculty engaged in practice are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the indicators in achieving these goals. These data can provide valuable information for trend analysis and, through heightened awareness of opportunities, increase faculty clinical scholarship activities.",
keywords = "Academic nursing practice, Clinical scholarship, Faculty practice",
author = "Kathryn Fiandt and Kathleen Barr and Gail Hille and Pelish, {Peggy L} and Bunny Pozehl and Polly Hulme and Susan Muhlbauer and Stephanie Burge",
year = "2004",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.profnurs.2004.04.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "147--155",
journal = "Journal of Professional Nursing",
issn = "8755-7223",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying clinical scholarship guidelines for faculty practice

AU - Fiandt, Kathryn

AU - Barr, Kathleen

AU - Hille, Gail

AU - Pelish, Peggy L

AU - Pozehl, Bunny

AU - Hulme, Polly

AU - Muhlbauer, Susan

AU - Burge, Stephanie

PY - 2004/5/1

Y1 - 2004/5/1

N2 - Clear descriptors of faculty practice and scholarly activities are essential to precisely demonstrate that the faculty practice role meets the standards of academic advancement and to influence academic policy. A description of scholarly clinical activities (1) justifies the benefits of faculty practice by means other than fiscal, (2) provides data for research regarding faculty practice, and (3) provides data to support the nursing profession's political, social, and health care agendas. Guidelines for clinical scholarship are described in this article. A review of relevant literature demonstrates that these guidelines go beyond current models by describing 24 scholarly activities organized into 4 areas: quality, governance, leadership, and knowledge development. Three years of data describing the scholarly activities of a college of nursing faculty engaged in practice are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the indicators in achieving these goals. These data can provide valuable information for trend analysis and, through heightened awareness of opportunities, increase faculty clinical scholarship activities.

AB - Clear descriptors of faculty practice and scholarly activities are essential to precisely demonstrate that the faculty practice role meets the standards of academic advancement and to influence academic policy. A description of scholarly clinical activities (1) justifies the benefits of faculty practice by means other than fiscal, (2) provides data for research regarding faculty practice, and (3) provides data to support the nursing profession's political, social, and health care agendas. Guidelines for clinical scholarship are described in this article. A review of relevant literature demonstrates that these guidelines go beyond current models by describing 24 scholarly activities organized into 4 areas: quality, governance, leadership, and knowledge development. Three years of data describing the scholarly activities of a college of nursing faculty engaged in practice are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the indicators in achieving these goals. These data can provide valuable information for trend analysis and, through heightened awareness of opportunities, increase faculty clinical scholarship activities.

KW - Academic nursing practice

KW - Clinical scholarship

KW - Faculty practice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3142691830&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3142691830&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.profnurs.2004.04.008

DO - 10.1016/j.profnurs.2004.04.008

M3 - Article

C2 - 15211423

AN - SCOPUS:3142691830

VL - 20

SP - 147

EP - 155

JO - Journal of Professional Nursing

JF - Journal of Professional Nursing

SN - 8755-7223

IS - 3

ER -