Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment: Characteristics of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit and well-baby nursery

Betty R. Vohr, Judith E. Widen, Barbara Cone-Wesson, Yvonne S. Sininger, Michael P Gorga, Richard C. Folsom, Susan J. Norton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

87 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to describe the demographic data, medical status, and incidence of risk factors for hearing impairment in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and well-baby populations in a multicenter prospective study designed to assess neonatal hearing impairment and to evaluate factors that might affect neonatal hearing test performance. Design: This was a prospective multicenter study funded by the National Institutes of Health-National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders to evaluate the effectiveness of auditory brain stem response, transient evoked otoacoustic emissions, and distortion product otoacoustic emissions for newborn hearing screening. Research staff at each site obtained informed consent and detailed demographic and medical data, including information on established risk factors for hearing loss on 4478 high-risk infants cared for in the NICU, 2348 infants from the well-baby nurseries with no risk factor, and 353 infants from the well-baby nurseries with risk factors. For follow-up purposes the sample was divided further to include a subgroup called selects. Selects were either infants from the well-baby nursery who had an established risk factor for hearing impairment (N = 353) or did not pass the neonatal hearing screen protocol (N = 80). In this study, we focus on the distribution of infants by nursery and risk factors only. Particular effort was made to enroll infants with risk factors for hearing loss in both the NICU and well-baby nurseries. Descriptive analyses are used to describe characteristics of this sample. Results: All 10 of the risk factors established by the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing in 1994 were identified in the NICU population. The four most common were ototoxic medications (44.4%), very low birth weight (17.8%), assisted ventilation > 5 days (16.4%), and low Apgar scores at 1 or 5 min (13.9%). In contrast, only six risk factors were present in the well-baby nurseries: family history (6.6%), craniofacial abnormalities (3.4%), low Apgar scores (2.8%), syndromes (0.5%), ototoxic medications (0.2%), and congenital infection (0.1%). Conclusion: These descriptive risk factor data reflect both the newborn populations at the study sites and the bias for enrolling infants at risk for hearing loss. The high-risk NICU sample reflects the characteristics typically found in graduates of the NICU. The data summarized in this study will be used to assess the relationships between risk factor and hearing test outcome.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)373-382
Number of pages10
JournalEar and hearing
Volume21
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000

Fingerprint

Nurseries
Neonatal Intensive Care Units
Hearing Loss
Hearing Tests
Hearing
Apgar Score
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (U.S.)
Multicenter Studies
Craniofacial Abnormalities
Demography
Newborn Infant
Prospective Studies
Population
Very Low Birth Weight Infant
Brain Stem Auditory Evoked Potentials
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Informed Consent
Ventilation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment : Characteristics of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit and well-baby nursery. / Vohr, Betty R.; Widen, Judith E.; Cone-Wesson, Barbara; Sininger, Yvonne S.; Gorga, Michael P; Folsom, Richard C.; Norton, Susan J.

In: Ear and hearing, Vol. 21, No. 5, 01.01.2000, p. 373-382.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Vohr, Betty R. ; Widen, Judith E. ; Cone-Wesson, Barbara ; Sininger, Yvonne S. ; Gorga, Michael P ; Folsom, Richard C. ; Norton, Susan J. / Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment : Characteristics of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit and well-baby nursery. In: Ear and hearing. 2000 ; Vol. 21, No. 5. pp. 373-382.
@article{9fef4429902d4ba8a2187da2b18a7fb6,
title = "Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment: Characteristics of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit and well-baby nursery",
abstract = "Objective: The objective of this study was to describe the demographic data, medical status, and incidence of risk factors for hearing impairment in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and well-baby populations in a multicenter prospective study designed to assess neonatal hearing impairment and to evaluate factors that might affect neonatal hearing test performance. Design: This was a prospective multicenter study funded by the National Institutes of Health-National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders to evaluate the effectiveness of auditory brain stem response, transient evoked otoacoustic emissions, and distortion product otoacoustic emissions for newborn hearing screening. Research staff at each site obtained informed consent and detailed demographic and medical data, including information on established risk factors for hearing loss on 4478 high-risk infants cared for in the NICU, 2348 infants from the well-baby nurseries with no risk factor, and 353 infants from the well-baby nurseries with risk factors. For follow-up purposes the sample was divided further to include a subgroup called selects. Selects were either infants from the well-baby nursery who had an established risk factor for hearing impairment (N = 353) or did not pass the neonatal hearing screen protocol (N = 80). In this study, we focus on the distribution of infants by nursery and risk factors only. Particular effort was made to enroll infants with risk factors for hearing loss in both the NICU and well-baby nurseries. Descriptive analyses are used to describe characteristics of this sample. Results: All 10 of the risk factors established by the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing in 1994 were identified in the NICU population. The four most common were ototoxic medications (44.4{\%}), very low birth weight (17.8{\%}), assisted ventilation > 5 days (16.4{\%}), and low Apgar scores at 1 or 5 min (13.9{\%}). In contrast, only six risk factors were present in the well-baby nurseries: family history (6.6{\%}), craniofacial abnormalities (3.4{\%}), low Apgar scores (2.8{\%}), syndromes (0.5{\%}), ototoxic medications (0.2{\%}), and congenital infection (0.1{\%}). Conclusion: These descriptive risk factor data reflect both the newborn populations at the study sites and the bias for enrolling infants at risk for hearing loss. The high-risk NICU sample reflects the characteristics typically found in graduates of the NICU. The data summarized in this study will be used to assess the relationships between risk factor and hearing test outcome.",
author = "Vohr, {Betty R.} and Widen, {Judith E.} and Barbara Cone-Wesson and Sininger, {Yvonne S.} and Gorga, {Michael P} and Folsom, {Richard C.} and Norton, {Susan J.}",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00003446-200010000-00005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "373--382",
journal = "Ear and Hearing",
issn = "0196-0202",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment

T2 - Characteristics of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit and well-baby nursery

AU - Vohr, Betty R.

AU - Widen, Judith E.

AU - Cone-Wesson, Barbara

AU - Sininger, Yvonne S.

AU - Gorga, Michael P

AU - Folsom, Richard C.

AU - Norton, Susan J.

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - Objective: The objective of this study was to describe the demographic data, medical status, and incidence of risk factors for hearing impairment in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and well-baby populations in a multicenter prospective study designed to assess neonatal hearing impairment and to evaluate factors that might affect neonatal hearing test performance. Design: This was a prospective multicenter study funded by the National Institutes of Health-National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders to evaluate the effectiveness of auditory brain stem response, transient evoked otoacoustic emissions, and distortion product otoacoustic emissions for newborn hearing screening. Research staff at each site obtained informed consent and detailed demographic and medical data, including information on established risk factors for hearing loss on 4478 high-risk infants cared for in the NICU, 2348 infants from the well-baby nurseries with no risk factor, and 353 infants from the well-baby nurseries with risk factors. For follow-up purposes the sample was divided further to include a subgroup called selects. Selects were either infants from the well-baby nursery who had an established risk factor for hearing impairment (N = 353) or did not pass the neonatal hearing screen protocol (N = 80). In this study, we focus on the distribution of infants by nursery and risk factors only. Particular effort was made to enroll infants with risk factors for hearing loss in both the NICU and well-baby nurseries. Descriptive analyses are used to describe characteristics of this sample. Results: All 10 of the risk factors established by the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing in 1994 were identified in the NICU population. The four most common were ototoxic medications (44.4%), very low birth weight (17.8%), assisted ventilation > 5 days (16.4%), and low Apgar scores at 1 or 5 min (13.9%). In contrast, only six risk factors were present in the well-baby nurseries: family history (6.6%), craniofacial abnormalities (3.4%), low Apgar scores (2.8%), syndromes (0.5%), ototoxic medications (0.2%), and congenital infection (0.1%). Conclusion: These descriptive risk factor data reflect both the newborn populations at the study sites and the bias for enrolling infants at risk for hearing loss. The high-risk NICU sample reflects the characteristics typically found in graduates of the NICU. The data summarized in this study will be used to assess the relationships between risk factor and hearing test outcome.

AB - Objective: The objective of this study was to describe the demographic data, medical status, and incidence of risk factors for hearing impairment in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and well-baby populations in a multicenter prospective study designed to assess neonatal hearing impairment and to evaluate factors that might affect neonatal hearing test performance. Design: This was a prospective multicenter study funded by the National Institutes of Health-National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders to evaluate the effectiveness of auditory brain stem response, transient evoked otoacoustic emissions, and distortion product otoacoustic emissions for newborn hearing screening. Research staff at each site obtained informed consent and detailed demographic and medical data, including information on established risk factors for hearing loss on 4478 high-risk infants cared for in the NICU, 2348 infants from the well-baby nurseries with no risk factor, and 353 infants from the well-baby nurseries with risk factors. For follow-up purposes the sample was divided further to include a subgroup called selects. Selects were either infants from the well-baby nursery who had an established risk factor for hearing impairment (N = 353) or did not pass the neonatal hearing screen protocol (N = 80). In this study, we focus on the distribution of infants by nursery and risk factors only. Particular effort was made to enroll infants with risk factors for hearing loss in both the NICU and well-baby nurseries. Descriptive analyses are used to describe characteristics of this sample. Results: All 10 of the risk factors established by the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing in 1994 were identified in the NICU population. The four most common were ototoxic medications (44.4%), very low birth weight (17.8%), assisted ventilation > 5 days (16.4%), and low Apgar scores at 1 or 5 min (13.9%). In contrast, only six risk factors were present in the well-baby nurseries: family history (6.6%), craniofacial abnormalities (3.4%), low Apgar scores (2.8%), syndromes (0.5%), ototoxic medications (0.2%), and congenital infection (0.1%). Conclusion: These descriptive risk factor data reflect both the newborn populations at the study sites and the bias for enrolling infants at risk for hearing loss. The high-risk NICU sample reflects the characteristics typically found in graduates of the NICU. The data summarized in this study will be used to assess the relationships between risk factor and hearing test outcome.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033794582&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033794582&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00003446-200010000-00005

DO - 10.1097/00003446-200010000-00005

M3 - Article

C2 - 11059699

AN - SCOPUS:0033794582

VL - 21

SP - 373

EP - 382

JO - Ear and Hearing

JF - Ear and Hearing

SN - 0196-0202

IS - 5

ER -