Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: Auditory brain stem responses in the perinatal period

Yvonne S. Sininger, Barbara Cone-Wesson, Richard C. Folsom, Michael P Gorga, Betty R. Vohr, Judith E. Widen, Michael Ekelid, Susan J. Norton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: 1) To describe the auditory brain stem response (ABR) measurement system and optimized methods used for study of newborn hearing screening. 2) To determine how recording and infant factors related to the screening, using well-defined, specific ABR outcome measures. Design: Seven thousand one hundred seventy-nine infants, 4478 from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and the remaining from the well-baby nursery, were evaluated with an automated ABR protocol in each ear. Two channel recordings were obtained (vertex to mastoid or channel A and vertex to nape of neck or channel B) in response to click stimuli of 30 and 69 dB nHL in all infants as well as 50 dB nHL in infants who did not meet criteria for response at 30 dB. Criteria for response included F(SP)≥3.1 and a tester-judgment of response. Criteria could be met in the first or repeat test with a maximum of 6144 accepted sweeps per test. Results: More than 99% of infants could complete the ABR protocol. More than 90% of NICU and well-baby nursery infants 'passed' given the strict criteria for response, whereas 86% of those with high risk factors met criterion for ABR response detection. The number of infants who did not meet ABR response criteria in one or both ears was systematically related to stimulus level with the largest group not meeting criteria at 30 dB followed by 50 and 69 dB nHL. Meeting criteria on the ABR was positively correlated with the amplitude of wave V, with low noise and low electrode impedance. Factors that predicted how many sweeps would be needed to reach criterion F(SP) included noise level of the test site, state of the baby (for example, quiet sleep versus crying), recording noise, electrode impedance and response latency. Channel A (vertex to mastoid) reached criterion more often than channel B (vertex to nape of neck) due to higher noise in channel B. Average total test time for 30 dB nHL screening in both ears was under 8 minutes. Well babies with risk factors took slightly longer to evaluate than other groups with this automated ABR procedure and have higher noise levels. Conclusions: ABR implemented with an automated detection algorithm using a 30 dB nHL click stimulus is reliable technique for rapid assessment of auditory status in newborns. Factors other than hearing loss that influenced the test result include infant state, electrode location and impedance, testing site, and infant risk status. Even so, ABRs were reliably recorded in the vast majority of babies under circumstances in which most babies are found in the perinatal period.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)383-399
Number of pages17
JournalEar and hearing
Volume21
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000

Fingerprint

Brain Stem Auditory Evoked Potentials
Hearing Loss
Noise
Electric Impedance
Ear
Electrodes
Mastoid
Nurseries
Neonatal Intensive Care Units
Neck
Newborn Infant
Crying
Group Processes
Hearing
Reaction Time
Sleep
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Sininger, Y. S., Cone-Wesson, B., Folsom, R. C., Gorga, M. P., Vohr, B. R., Widen, J. E., ... Norton, S. J. (2000). Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: Auditory brain stem responses in the perinatal period. Ear and hearing, 21(5), 383-399. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-200010000-00006

Identification of neonatal hearing impairment : Auditory brain stem responses in the perinatal period. / Sininger, Yvonne S.; Cone-Wesson, Barbara; Folsom, Richard C.; Gorga, Michael P; Vohr, Betty R.; Widen, Judith E.; Ekelid, Michael; Norton, Susan J.

In: Ear and hearing, Vol. 21, No. 5, 01.01.2000, p. 383-399.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sininger, YS, Cone-Wesson, B, Folsom, RC, Gorga, MP, Vohr, BR, Widen, JE, Ekelid, M & Norton, SJ 2000, 'Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: Auditory brain stem responses in the perinatal period', Ear and hearing, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 383-399. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-200010000-00006
Sininger, Yvonne S. ; Cone-Wesson, Barbara ; Folsom, Richard C. ; Gorga, Michael P ; Vohr, Betty R. ; Widen, Judith E. ; Ekelid, Michael ; Norton, Susan J. / Identification of neonatal hearing impairment : Auditory brain stem responses in the perinatal period. In: Ear and hearing. 2000 ; Vol. 21, No. 5. pp. 383-399.
@article{376a430d7db84bb0b88c090d9e9c687b,
title = "Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: Auditory brain stem responses in the perinatal period",
abstract = "Objectives: 1) To describe the auditory brain stem response (ABR) measurement system and optimized methods used for study of newborn hearing screening. 2) To determine how recording and infant factors related to the screening, using well-defined, specific ABR outcome measures. Design: Seven thousand one hundred seventy-nine infants, 4478 from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and the remaining from the well-baby nursery, were evaluated with an automated ABR protocol in each ear. Two channel recordings were obtained (vertex to mastoid or channel A and vertex to nape of neck or channel B) in response to click stimuli of 30 and 69 dB nHL in all infants as well as 50 dB nHL in infants who did not meet criteria for response at 30 dB. Criteria for response included F(SP)≥3.1 and a tester-judgment of response. Criteria could be met in the first or repeat test with a maximum of 6144 accepted sweeps per test. Results: More than 99{\%} of infants could complete the ABR protocol. More than 90{\%} of NICU and well-baby nursery infants 'passed' given the strict criteria for response, whereas 86{\%} of those with high risk factors met criterion for ABR response detection. The number of infants who did not meet ABR response criteria in one or both ears was systematically related to stimulus level with the largest group not meeting criteria at 30 dB followed by 50 and 69 dB nHL. Meeting criteria on the ABR was positively correlated with the amplitude of wave V, with low noise and low electrode impedance. Factors that predicted how many sweeps would be needed to reach criterion F(SP) included noise level of the test site, state of the baby (for example, quiet sleep versus crying), recording noise, electrode impedance and response latency. Channel A (vertex to mastoid) reached criterion more often than channel B (vertex to nape of neck) due to higher noise in channel B. Average total test time for 30 dB nHL screening in both ears was under 8 minutes. Well babies with risk factors took slightly longer to evaluate than other groups with this automated ABR procedure and have higher noise levels. Conclusions: ABR implemented with an automated detection algorithm using a 30 dB nHL click stimulus is reliable technique for rapid assessment of auditory status in newborns. Factors other than hearing loss that influenced the test result include infant state, electrode location and impedance, testing site, and infant risk status. Even so, ABRs were reliably recorded in the vast majority of babies under circumstances in which most babies are found in the perinatal period.",
author = "Sininger, {Yvonne S.} and Barbara Cone-Wesson and Folsom, {Richard C.} and Gorga, {Michael P} and Vohr, {Betty R.} and Widen, {Judith E.} and Michael Ekelid and Norton, {Susan J.}",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00003446-200010000-00006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "383--399",
journal = "Ear and Hearing",
issn = "0196-0202",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identification of neonatal hearing impairment

T2 - Auditory brain stem responses in the perinatal period

AU - Sininger, Yvonne S.

AU - Cone-Wesson, Barbara

AU - Folsom, Richard C.

AU - Gorga, Michael P

AU - Vohr, Betty R.

AU - Widen, Judith E.

AU - Ekelid, Michael

AU - Norton, Susan J.

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - Objectives: 1) To describe the auditory brain stem response (ABR) measurement system and optimized methods used for study of newborn hearing screening. 2) To determine how recording and infant factors related to the screening, using well-defined, specific ABR outcome measures. Design: Seven thousand one hundred seventy-nine infants, 4478 from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and the remaining from the well-baby nursery, were evaluated with an automated ABR protocol in each ear. Two channel recordings were obtained (vertex to mastoid or channel A and vertex to nape of neck or channel B) in response to click stimuli of 30 and 69 dB nHL in all infants as well as 50 dB nHL in infants who did not meet criteria for response at 30 dB. Criteria for response included F(SP)≥3.1 and a tester-judgment of response. Criteria could be met in the first or repeat test with a maximum of 6144 accepted sweeps per test. Results: More than 99% of infants could complete the ABR protocol. More than 90% of NICU and well-baby nursery infants 'passed' given the strict criteria for response, whereas 86% of those with high risk factors met criterion for ABR response detection. The number of infants who did not meet ABR response criteria in one or both ears was systematically related to stimulus level with the largest group not meeting criteria at 30 dB followed by 50 and 69 dB nHL. Meeting criteria on the ABR was positively correlated with the amplitude of wave V, with low noise and low electrode impedance. Factors that predicted how many sweeps would be needed to reach criterion F(SP) included noise level of the test site, state of the baby (for example, quiet sleep versus crying), recording noise, electrode impedance and response latency. Channel A (vertex to mastoid) reached criterion more often than channel B (vertex to nape of neck) due to higher noise in channel B. Average total test time for 30 dB nHL screening in both ears was under 8 minutes. Well babies with risk factors took slightly longer to evaluate than other groups with this automated ABR procedure and have higher noise levels. Conclusions: ABR implemented with an automated detection algorithm using a 30 dB nHL click stimulus is reliable technique for rapid assessment of auditory status in newborns. Factors other than hearing loss that influenced the test result include infant state, electrode location and impedance, testing site, and infant risk status. Even so, ABRs were reliably recorded in the vast majority of babies under circumstances in which most babies are found in the perinatal period.

AB - Objectives: 1) To describe the auditory brain stem response (ABR) measurement system and optimized methods used for study of newborn hearing screening. 2) To determine how recording and infant factors related to the screening, using well-defined, specific ABR outcome measures. Design: Seven thousand one hundred seventy-nine infants, 4478 from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and the remaining from the well-baby nursery, were evaluated with an automated ABR protocol in each ear. Two channel recordings were obtained (vertex to mastoid or channel A and vertex to nape of neck or channel B) in response to click stimuli of 30 and 69 dB nHL in all infants as well as 50 dB nHL in infants who did not meet criteria for response at 30 dB. Criteria for response included F(SP)≥3.1 and a tester-judgment of response. Criteria could be met in the first or repeat test with a maximum of 6144 accepted sweeps per test. Results: More than 99% of infants could complete the ABR protocol. More than 90% of NICU and well-baby nursery infants 'passed' given the strict criteria for response, whereas 86% of those with high risk factors met criterion for ABR response detection. The number of infants who did not meet ABR response criteria in one or both ears was systematically related to stimulus level with the largest group not meeting criteria at 30 dB followed by 50 and 69 dB nHL. Meeting criteria on the ABR was positively correlated with the amplitude of wave V, with low noise and low electrode impedance. Factors that predicted how many sweeps would be needed to reach criterion F(SP) included noise level of the test site, state of the baby (for example, quiet sleep versus crying), recording noise, electrode impedance and response latency. Channel A (vertex to mastoid) reached criterion more often than channel B (vertex to nape of neck) due to higher noise in channel B. Average total test time for 30 dB nHL screening in both ears was under 8 minutes. Well babies with risk factors took slightly longer to evaluate than other groups with this automated ABR procedure and have higher noise levels. Conclusions: ABR implemented with an automated detection algorithm using a 30 dB nHL click stimulus is reliable technique for rapid assessment of auditory status in newborns. Factors other than hearing loss that influenced the test result include infant state, electrode location and impedance, testing site, and infant risk status. Even so, ABRs were reliably recorded in the vast majority of babies under circumstances in which most babies are found in the perinatal period.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033788766&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033788766&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00003446-200010000-00006

DO - 10.1097/00003446-200010000-00006

M3 - Article

C2 - 11059700

AN - SCOPUS:0033788766

VL - 21

SP - 383

EP - 399

JO - Ear and Hearing

JF - Ear and Hearing

SN - 0196-0202

IS - 5

ER -