Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment: A multicenter investigation

Susan J. Norton, Michael P Gorga, Judith E. Widen, Richard C. Folsom, Yvonne Sininger, Barbara Cone-Wesson, Betty R. Vohr, Kristin A. Fletcher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: This article describes the design of a multicenter study sponsored by the National Institutes of Health. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of three measures of peripheral auditory system status (transient evoked otoacoustic emissions, distortion product otoacoustic emissions, and auditory brain stem responses) applied in the perinatal period for predicting behavioral hearing status at 8 to 12 mo corrected age. The influences of the infant's medical status, the test environment, and test and response parameters on test performance were examined. Design: Seven institutions participated in this study. There were 7179 infants evaluated in the perinatal period. All graduates of the neonatal intensive care unit (4478) and well babies with one or more risk factor for hearing loss (353) were targeted for follow-up testing using visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) at 8 to 12 mo corrected age. Well babies without any risk indicators (N = 2348) were not targeted for follow-up VRA testing. However, 80 of these well babies did not pass the screening protocol and thus were targeted for follow-up VRA testing as well. Perinatal test performance was evaluated using the VRA data as the 'gold standard.' Results: The results of this study are described in a series of 11 articles following this introductory article. Conclusions: The evaluation of newborn hearing tests required a longitudinal study in which newborn test results were compared with a gold standard based on behavioral audiometric assessment. Such an evaluation was possible because all newborns, passes as well as refers, were followed up long enough to permit reliable behavioral measurements. In addition, prenatal, perinatal, and maternal history information, test environment, and test parameter information were collected to provide data that led to a complete description of factors affecting test outcomes. All of these data were obtained in a sample of sufficient ethnic, medical, and geographic diversity in efforts to increase the generalizability of the results. Finally, the data were combined in a relational data base to examine the factors that influence test performance. Specific information related to these issues is presented in the articles that follow.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)348-356
Number of pages9
JournalEar and hearing
Volume21
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000

Fingerprint

Audiometry
Hearing Loss
Newborn Infant
Hearing Tests
Brain Stem Auditory Evoked Potentials
Neonatal Intensive Care Units
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Hearing
Multicenter Studies
Longitudinal Studies
Mothers
Databases
Reinforcement (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Norton, S. J., Gorga, M. P., Widen, J. E., Folsom, R. C., Sininger, Y., Cone-Wesson, B., ... Fletcher, K. A. (2000). Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment: A multicenter investigation. Ear and hearing, 21(5), 348-356. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-200010000-00003

Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment : A multicenter investigation. / Norton, Susan J.; Gorga, Michael P; Widen, Judith E.; Folsom, Richard C.; Sininger, Yvonne; Cone-Wesson, Barbara; Vohr, Betty R.; Fletcher, Kristin A.

In: Ear and hearing, Vol. 21, No. 5, 01.01.2000, p. 348-356.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Norton, SJ, Gorga, MP, Widen, JE, Folsom, RC, Sininger, Y, Cone-Wesson, B, Vohr, BR & Fletcher, KA 2000, 'Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment: A multicenter investigation', Ear and hearing, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 348-356. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-200010000-00003
Norton, Susan J. ; Gorga, Michael P ; Widen, Judith E. ; Folsom, Richard C. ; Sininger, Yvonne ; Cone-Wesson, Barbara ; Vohr, Betty R. ; Fletcher, Kristin A. / Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment : A multicenter investigation. In: Ear and hearing. 2000 ; Vol. 21, No. 5. pp. 348-356.
@article{978fd7c18dc84240990af1a0cfc39606,
title = "Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment: A multicenter investigation",
abstract = "Objectives: This article describes the design of a multicenter study sponsored by the National Institutes of Health. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of three measures of peripheral auditory system status (transient evoked otoacoustic emissions, distortion product otoacoustic emissions, and auditory brain stem responses) applied in the perinatal period for predicting behavioral hearing status at 8 to 12 mo corrected age. The influences of the infant's medical status, the test environment, and test and response parameters on test performance were examined. Design: Seven institutions participated in this study. There were 7179 infants evaluated in the perinatal period. All graduates of the neonatal intensive care unit (4478) and well babies with one or more risk factor for hearing loss (353) were targeted for follow-up testing using visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) at 8 to 12 mo corrected age. Well babies without any risk indicators (N = 2348) were not targeted for follow-up VRA testing. However, 80 of these well babies did not pass the screening protocol and thus were targeted for follow-up VRA testing as well. Perinatal test performance was evaluated using the VRA data as the 'gold standard.' Results: The results of this study are described in a series of 11 articles following this introductory article. Conclusions: The evaluation of newborn hearing tests required a longitudinal study in which newborn test results were compared with a gold standard based on behavioral audiometric assessment. Such an evaluation was possible because all newborns, passes as well as refers, were followed up long enough to permit reliable behavioral measurements. In addition, prenatal, perinatal, and maternal history information, test environment, and test parameter information were collected to provide data that led to a complete description of factors affecting test outcomes. All of these data were obtained in a sample of sufficient ethnic, medical, and geographic diversity in efforts to increase the generalizability of the results. Finally, the data were combined in a relational data base to examine the factors that influence test performance. Specific information related to these issues is presented in the articles that follow.",
author = "Norton, {Susan J.} and Gorga, {Michael P} and Widen, {Judith E.} and Folsom, {Richard C.} and Yvonne Sininger and Barbara Cone-Wesson and Vohr, {Betty R.} and Fletcher, {Kristin A.}",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00003446-200010000-00003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "348--356",
journal = "Ear and Hearing",
issn = "0196-0202",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identification of Neonatal Hearing Impairment

T2 - A multicenter investigation

AU - Norton, Susan J.

AU - Gorga, Michael P

AU - Widen, Judith E.

AU - Folsom, Richard C.

AU - Sininger, Yvonne

AU - Cone-Wesson, Barbara

AU - Vohr, Betty R.

AU - Fletcher, Kristin A.

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - Objectives: This article describes the design of a multicenter study sponsored by the National Institutes of Health. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of three measures of peripheral auditory system status (transient evoked otoacoustic emissions, distortion product otoacoustic emissions, and auditory brain stem responses) applied in the perinatal period for predicting behavioral hearing status at 8 to 12 mo corrected age. The influences of the infant's medical status, the test environment, and test and response parameters on test performance were examined. Design: Seven institutions participated in this study. There were 7179 infants evaluated in the perinatal period. All graduates of the neonatal intensive care unit (4478) and well babies with one or more risk factor for hearing loss (353) were targeted for follow-up testing using visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) at 8 to 12 mo corrected age. Well babies without any risk indicators (N = 2348) were not targeted for follow-up VRA testing. However, 80 of these well babies did not pass the screening protocol and thus were targeted for follow-up VRA testing as well. Perinatal test performance was evaluated using the VRA data as the 'gold standard.' Results: The results of this study are described in a series of 11 articles following this introductory article. Conclusions: The evaluation of newborn hearing tests required a longitudinal study in which newborn test results were compared with a gold standard based on behavioral audiometric assessment. Such an evaluation was possible because all newborns, passes as well as refers, were followed up long enough to permit reliable behavioral measurements. In addition, prenatal, perinatal, and maternal history information, test environment, and test parameter information were collected to provide data that led to a complete description of factors affecting test outcomes. All of these data were obtained in a sample of sufficient ethnic, medical, and geographic diversity in efforts to increase the generalizability of the results. Finally, the data were combined in a relational data base to examine the factors that influence test performance. Specific information related to these issues is presented in the articles that follow.

AB - Objectives: This article describes the design of a multicenter study sponsored by the National Institutes of Health. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of three measures of peripheral auditory system status (transient evoked otoacoustic emissions, distortion product otoacoustic emissions, and auditory brain stem responses) applied in the perinatal period for predicting behavioral hearing status at 8 to 12 mo corrected age. The influences of the infant's medical status, the test environment, and test and response parameters on test performance were examined. Design: Seven institutions participated in this study. There were 7179 infants evaluated in the perinatal period. All graduates of the neonatal intensive care unit (4478) and well babies with one or more risk factor for hearing loss (353) were targeted for follow-up testing using visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) at 8 to 12 mo corrected age. Well babies without any risk indicators (N = 2348) were not targeted for follow-up VRA testing. However, 80 of these well babies did not pass the screening protocol and thus were targeted for follow-up VRA testing as well. Perinatal test performance was evaluated using the VRA data as the 'gold standard.' Results: The results of this study are described in a series of 11 articles following this introductory article. Conclusions: The evaluation of newborn hearing tests required a longitudinal study in which newborn test results were compared with a gold standard based on behavioral audiometric assessment. Such an evaluation was possible because all newborns, passes as well as refers, were followed up long enough to permit reliable behavioral measurements. In addition, prenatal, perinatal, and maternal history information, test environment, and test parameter information were collected to provide data that led to a complete description of factors affecting test outcomes. All of these data were obtained in a sample of sufficient ethnic, medical, and geographic diversity in efforts to increase the generalizability of the results. Finally, the data were combined in a relational data base to examine the factors that influence test performance. Specific information related to these issues is presented in the articles that follow.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033788943&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033788943&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00003446-200010000-00003

DO - 10.1097/00003446-200010000-00003

M3 - Article

C2 - 11059697

AN - SCOPUS:0033788943

VL - 21

SP - 348

EP - 356

JO - Ear and Hearing

JF - Ear and Hearing

SN - 0196-0202

IS - 5

ER -