How surgical faculty and residents assess the first year of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education duty-hour restrictions: Results of a multi-institutional study

James E. Coverdill, Gina L. Adrales, William Finlay, John D. Mellinger, Kimberly D. Anderson, Bruce W. Bonnell, Joseph B. Cofer, Douglas B. Dorner, Carl Haisch, Kristi L. Harold, Paula M. Termuhlen, Alexandra L.B. Webb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: This study examined how surgical residents and faculty assessed the first year of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education duty-hour restrictions. Methods: Questionnaires were administered in 9 general-surgery programs during the summer of 2004; response rates were 63% for faculty and 58% for residents (N = 259). Questions probed patient care, the residency program, quality of life, and overall assessments of the duty-hour restrictions. Results include the means, mean deviations, percentage who agree or strongly agree with the hour restrictions, and significance tests. Results: Although most support the restrictions, few maintain that they improved surgical training or patient care. Faculty and residents differed (P ≤ .05) on 16 of 21 items. Every difference shows that residents view the restrictions more favorably than faculty. The sex of the resident shaped the magnitude of the gap for 11 of 21 items. Conclusions: Few believe that duty-hour restrictions improve patient care or resident training. Residents, especially female residents, view the restrictions more favorably than faculty.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)11-16
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican journal of surgery
Volume191
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2006

Fingerprint

Graduate Medical Education
Accreditation
Patient Care
Internship and Residency
Quality of Life

Keywords

  • Duty hour restrictions
  • Surgical faculty
  • Surgical residents

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

How surgical faculty and residents assess the first year of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education duty-hour restrictions : Results of a multi-institutional study. / Coverdill, James E.; Adrales, Gina L.; Finlay, William; Mellinger, John D.; Anderson, Kimberly D.; Bonnell, Bruce W.; Cofer, Joseph B.; Dorner, Douglas B.; Haisch, Carl; Harold, Kristi L.; Termuhlen, Paula M.; Webb, Alexandra L.B.

In: American journal of surgery, Vol. 191, No. 1, 01.01.2006, p. 11-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Coverdill, JE, Adrales, GL, Finlay, W, Mellinger, JD, Anderson, KD, Bonnell, BW, Cofer, JB, Dorner, DB, Haisch, C, Harold, KL, Termuhlen, PM & Webb, ALB 2006, 'How surgical faculty and residents assess the first year of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education duty-hour restrictions: Results of a multi-institutional study', American journal of surgery, vol. 191, no. 1, pp. 11-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.06.044
Coverdill, James E. ; Adrales, Gina L. ; Finlay, William ; Mellinger, John D. ; Anderson, Kimberly D. ; Bonnell, Bruce W. ; Cofer, Joseph B. ; Dorner, Douglas B. ; Haisch, Carl ; Harold, Kristi L. ; Termuhlen, Paula M. ; Webb, Alexandra L.B. / How surgical faculty and residents assess the first year of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education duty-hour restrictions : Results of a multi-institutional study. In: American journal of surgery. 2006 ; Vol. 191, No. 1. pp. 11-16.
@article{1da49bd6c425474fa6433f0d30aa249e,
title = "How surgical faculty and residents assess the first year of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education duty-hour restrictions: Results of a multi-institutional study",
abstract = "Background: This study examined how surgical residents and faculty assessed the first year of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education duty-hour restrictions. Methods: Questionnaires were administered in 9 general-surgery programs during the summer of 2004; response rates were 63{\%} for faculty and 58{\%} for residents (N = 259). Questions probed patient care, the residency program, quality of life, and overall assessments of the duty-hour restrictions. Results include the means, mean deviations, percentage who agree or strongly agree with the hour restrictions, and significance tests. Results: Although most support the restrictions, few maintain that they improved surgical training or patient care. Faculty and residents differed (P ≤ .05) on 16 of 21 items. Every difference shows that residents view the restrictions more favorably than faculty. The sex of the resident shaped the magnitude of the gap for 11 of 21 items. Conclusions: Few believe that duty-hour restrictions improve patient care or resident training. Residents, especially female residents, view the restrictions more favorably than faculty.",
keywords = "Duty hour restrictions, Surgical faculty, Surgical residents",
author = "Coverdill, {James E.} and Adrales, {Gina L.} and William Finlay and Mellinger, {John D.} and Anderson, {Kimberly D.} and Bonnell, {Bruce W.} and Cofer, {Joseph B.} and Dorner, {Douglas B.} and Carl Haisch and Harold, {Kristi L.} and Termuhlen, {Paula M.} and Webb, {Alexandra L.B.}",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.06.044",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "191",
pages = "11--16",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How surgical faculty and residents assess the first year of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education duty-hour restrictions

T2 - Results of a multi-institutional study

AU - Coverdill, James E.

AU - Adrales, Gina L.

AU - Finlay, William

AU - Mellinger, John D.

AU - Anderson, Kimberly D.

AU - Bonnell, Bruce W.

AU - Cofer, Joseph B.

AU - Dorner, Douglas B.

AU - Haisch, Carl

AU - Harold, Kristi L.

AU - Termuhlen, Paula M.

AU - Webb, Alexandra L.B.

PY - 2006/1/1

Y1 - 2006/1/1

N2 - Background: This study examined how surgical residents and faculty assessed the first year of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education duty-hour restrictions. Methods: Questionnaires were administered in 9 general-surgery programs during the summer of 2004; response rates were 63% for faculty and 58% for residents (N = 259). Questions probed patient care, the residency program, quality of life, and overall assessments of the duty-hour restrictions. Results include the means, mean deviations, percentage who agree or strongly agree with the hour restrictions, and significance tests. Results: Although most support the restrictions, few maintain that they improved surgical training or patient care. Faculty and residents differed (P ≤ .05) on 16 of 21 items. Every difference shows that residents view the restrictions more favorably than faculty. The sex of the resident shaped the magnitude of the gap for 11 of 21 items. Conclusions: Few believe that duty-hour restrictions improve patient care or resident training. Residents, especially female residents, view the restrictions more favorably than faculty.

AB - Background: This study examined how surgical residents and faculty assessed the first year of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education duty-hour restrictions. Methods: Questionnaires were administered in 9 general-surgery programs during the summer of 2004; response rates were 63% for faculty and 58% for residents (N = 259). Questions probed patient care, the residency program, quality of life, and overall assessments of the duty-hour restrictions. Results include the means, mean deviations, percentage who agree or strongly agree with the hour restrictions, and significance tests. Results: Although most support the restrictions, few maintain that they improved surgical training or patient care. Faculty and residents differed (P ≤ .05) on 16 of 21 items. Every difference shows that residents view the restrictions more favorably than faculty. The sex of the resident shaped the magnitude of the gap for 11 of 21 items. Conclusions: Few believe that duty-hour restrictions improve patient care or resident training. Residents, especially female residents, view the restrictions more favorably than faculty.

KW - Duty hour restrictions

KW - Surgical faculty

KW - Surgical residents

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=29944444271&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=29944444271&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.06.044

DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.06.044

M3 - Article

C2 - 16399099

AN - SCOPUS:29944444271

VL - 191

SP - 11

EP - 16

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 1

ER -