How Physicians Use Clinical Information in Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism: An Application of Conjoint Analysis

Robert Swift Wigton, V. L. Hoellerich, K. D. Patil

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To investigate what diagnostic strategies physicians adopt when the literature is unclear about the best use of diagnostic information, the authors examined how physicians weighted eight items of clinical information in diagnosing pulmonary embolism. Thirteen faculty mem bers, 23 house officers, and 19 students estimated the likelihood of pulmonary embolism and predicted whether they would begin treatment in 27 simulated cases. The vignettes were constructed using a fractional factorial design and analyzed using conjoint analysis. Overall the lung scan results (34.7%) and leg examination (19.0%) were weighted most heavily in making the diagnosis, whereas the leg examination (35.7%) was given the greatest weight when deciding about therapy. Weights given by groups at different levels of training were similar, but there was considerable variation within groups. Heterogeneity of diagnostic strategies did not appear to decrease in groups with more training and experience. Multi variate analysis of predictors of pulmonary embolism in 102 actual cases showed that al though lung scan results were important in both actual and simulated cases, heart rate accounted for the most variance in the actual cases but was hardly used in the physicians strategies. There is considerable variation among physicians in how clinical information is used in diagnosing pulmonary embolism, and the variation may not decrease with increased experience.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2-11
Number of pages10
JournalMedical Decision Making
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1986

Fingerprint

Pulmonary Embolism
Physicians
Leg
Weights and Measures
Lung
Heart Rate
Students
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • clinical diagnosis
  • conjoint analysis
  • diagnostic strategies
  • pulmonary embolism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

How Physicians Use Clinical Information in Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism : An Application of Conjoint Analysis. / Wigton, Robert Swift; Hoellerich, V. L.; Patil, K. D.

In: Medical Decision Making, Vol. 6, No. 1, 02.1986, p. 2-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1a9e0684e868407dbec1aabb39029162,
title = "How Physicians Use Clinical Information in Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism: An Application of Conjoint Analysis",
abstract = "To investigate what diagnostic strategies physicians adopt when the literature is unclear about the best use of diagnostic information, the authors examined how physicians weighted eight items of clinical information in diagnosing pulmonary embolism. Thirteen faculty mem bers, 23 house officers, and 19 students estimated the likelihood of pulmonary embolism and predicted whether they would begin treatment in 27 simulated cases. The vignettes were constructed using a fractional factorial design and analyzed using conjoint analysis. Overall the lung scan results (34.7{\%}) and leg examination (19.0{\%}) were weighted most heavily in making the diagnosis, whereas the leg examination (35.7{\%}) was given the greatest weight when deciding about therapy. Weights given by groups at different levels of training were similar, but there was considerable variation within groups. Heterogeneity of diagnostic strategies did not appear to decrease in groups with more training and experience. Multi variate analysis of predictors of pulmonary embolism in 102 actual cases showed that al though lung scan results were important in both actual and simulated cases, heart rate accounted for the most variance in the actual cases but was hardly used in the physicians strategies. There is considerable variation among physicians in how clinical information is used in diagnosing pulmonary embolism, and the variation may not decrease with increased experience.",
keywords = "clinical diagnosis, conjoint analysis, diagnostic strategies, pulmonary embolism",
author = "Wigton, {Robert Swift} and Hoellerich, {V. L.} and Patil, {K. D.}",
year = "1986",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1177/0272989X8600600102",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "2--11",
journal = "Medical Decision Making",
issn = "0272-989X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Physicians Use Clinical Information in Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism

T2 - An Application of Conjoint Analysis

AU - Wigton, Robert Swift

AU - Hoellerich, V. L.

AU - Patil, K. D.

PY - 1986/2

Y1 - 1986/2

N2 - To investigate what diagnostic strategies physicians adopt when the literature is unclear about the best use of diagnostic information, the authors examined how physicians weighted eight items of clinical information in diagnosing pulmonary embolism. Thirteen faculty mem bers, 23 house officers, and 19 students estimated the likelihood of pulmonary embolism and predicted whether they would begin treatment in 27 simulated cases. The vignettes were constructed using a fractional factorial design and analyzed using conjoint analysis. Overall the lung scan results (34.7%) and leg examination (19.0%) were weighted most heavily in making the diagnosis, whereas the leg examination (35.7%) was given the greatest weight when deciding about therapy. Weights given by groups at different levels of training were similar, but there was considerable variation within groups. Heterogeneity of diagnostic strategies did not appear to decrease in groups with more training and experience. Multi variate analysis of predictors of pulmonary embolism in 102 actual cases showed that al though lung scan results were important in both actual and simulated cases, heart rate accounted for the most variance in the actual cases but was hardly used in the physicians strategies. There is considerable variation among physicians in how clinical information is used in diagnosing pulmonary embolism, and the variation may not decrease with increased experience.

AB - To investigate what diagnostic strategies physicians adopt when the literature is unclear about the best use of diagnostic information, the authors examined how physicians weighted eight items of clinical information in diagnosing pulmonary embolism. Thirteen faculty mem bers, 23 house officers, and 19 students estimated the likelihood of pulmonary embolism and predicted whether they would begin treatment in 27 simulated cases. The vignettes were constructed using a fractional factorial design and analyzed using conjoint analysis. Overall the lung scan results (34.7%) and leg examination (19.0%) were weighted most heavily in making the diagnosis, whereas the leg examination (35.7%) was given the greatest weight when deciding about therapy. Weights given by groups at different levels of training were similar, but there was considerable variation within groups. Heterogeneity of diagnostic strategies did not appear to decrease in groups with more training and experience. Multi variate analysis of predictors of pulmonary embolism in 102 actual cases showed that al though lung scan results were important in both actual and simulated cases, heart rate accounted for the most variance in the actual cases but was hardly used in the physicians strategies. There is considerable variation among physicians in how clinical information is used in diagnosing pulmonary embolism, and the variation may not decrease with increased experience.

KW - clinical diagnosis

KW - conjoint analysis

KW - diagnostic strategies

KW - pulmonary embolism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022639616&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022639616&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0272989X8600600102

DO - 10.1177/0272989X8600600102

M3 - Article

C2 - 3945182

AN - SCOPUS:0022639616

VL - 6

SP - 2

EP - 11

JO - Medical Decision Making

JF - Medical Decision Making

SN - 0272-989X

IS - 1

ER -