How indeterminism shapes ecologists' contributions to managing socio-ecological systems

Sarah Michaels, Andrew J. Tyre

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To make a difference in policy making about socio-ecological systems, ecologists must grasp when decision makers are amenable to acting on ecological expertise and when they are not. To enable them to do so we present a matrix for classifying a socio-ecological system by the extent of what we don't know about its natural components and the social interactions that affects them. We use four examples, Midcontinent Mallards, Laysan Ducks, Pallid Sturgeon, and Rocky Mountain Grey Wolves to illustrate how the combination of natural and social source of indeterminism matters. Where social indeterminism is high, ecologists can expand the range of possible science-based options decision makers might consider even while recognizing societal-based concerns rather than science will dominate decision making. In contrast, where natural indeterminism is low, ecologists can offer reasonably accurate predictions that may well serve as inputs into decision making. Depending on the combination of natural and social indeterminism characterizing a particular circumstance, ecologists have different roles to play in informing socio-ecological system management.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)289-295
Number of pages7
JournalConservation Letters
Volume5
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2012

Fingerprint

ecologists
decision making
policy making
matrix
mountain
Canis lupus
Anas platyrhynchos
Rocky Mountain region
prediction
science
decision

Keywords

  • Indeterminism
  • Risk
  • Science policy interface
  • Socio-ecological systems
  • Uncertainty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

How indeterminism shapes ecologists' contributions to managing socio-ecological systems. / Michaels, Sarah; Tyre, Andrew J.

In: Conservation Letters, Vol. 5, No. 4, 01.08.2012, p. 289-295.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f778ee47c1a148f5b969e962a7d8f7e2,
title = "How indeterminism shapes ecologists' contributions to managing socio-ecological systems",
abstract = "To make a difference in policy making about socio-ecological systems, ecologists must grasp when decision makers are amenable to acting on ecological expertise and when they are not. To enable them to do so we present a matrix for classifying a socio-ecological system by the extent of what we don't know about its natural components and the social interactions that affects them. We use four examples, Midcontinent Mallards, Laysan Ducks, Pallid Sturgeon, and Rocky Mountain Grey Wolves to illustrate how the combination of natural and social source of indeterminism matters. Where social indeterminism is high, ecologists can expand the range of possible science-based options decision makers might consider even while recognizing societal-based concerns rather than science will dominate decision making. In contrast, where natural indeterminism is low, ecologists can offer reasonably accurate predictions that may well serve as inputs into decision making. Depending on the combination of natural and social indeterminism characterizing a particular circumstance, ecologists have different roles to play in informing socio-ecological system management.",
keywords = "Indeterminism, Risk, Science policy interface, Socio-ecological systems, Uncertainty",
author = "Sarah Michaels and Tyre, {Andrew J.}",
year = "2012",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00241.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "289--295",
journal = "Conservation Letters",
issn = "1755-263X",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How indeterminism shapes ecologists' contributions to managing socio-ecological systems

AU - Michaels, Sarah

AU - Tyre, Andrew J.

PY - 2012/8/1

Y1 - 2012/8/1

N2 - To make a difference in policy making about socio-ecological systems, ecologists must grasp when decision makers are amenable to acting on ecological expertise and when they are not. To enable them to do so we present a matrix for classifying a socio-ecological system by the extent of what we don't know about its natural components and the social interactions that affects them. We use four examples, Midcontinent Mallards, Laysan Ducks, Pallid Sturgeon, and Rocky Mountain Grey Wolves to illustrate how the combination of natural and social source of indeterminism matters. Where social indeterminism is high, ecologists can expand the range of possible science-based options decision makers might consider even while recognizing societal-based concerns rather than science will dominate decision making. In contrast, where natural indeterminism is low, ecologists can offer reasonably accurate predictions that may well serve as inputs into decision making. Depending on the combination of natural and social indeterminism characterizing a particular circumstance, ecologists have different roles to play in informing socio-ecological system management.

AB - To make a difference in policy making about socio-ecological systems, ecologists must grasp when decision makers are amenable to acting on ecological expertise and when they are not. To enable them to do so we present a matrix for classifying a socio-ecological system by the extent of what we don't know about its natural components and the social interactions that affects them. We use four examples, Midcontinent Mallards, Laysan Ducks, Pallid Sturgeon, and Rocky Mountain Grey Wolves to illustrate how the combination of natural and social source of indeterminism matters. Where social indeterminism is high, ecologists can expand the range of possible science-based options decision makers might consider even while recognizing societal-based concerns rather than science will dominate decision making. In contrast, where natural indeterminism is low, ecologists can offer reasonably accurate predictions that may well serve as inputs into decision making. Depending on the combination of natural and social indeterminism characterizing a particular circumstance, ecologists have different roles to play in informing socio-ecological system management.

KW - Indeterminism

KW - Risk

KW - Science policy interface

KW - Socio-ecological systems

KW - Uncertainty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864847828&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864847828&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00241.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00241.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84864847828

VL - 5

SP - 289

EP - 295

JO - Conservation Letters

JF - Conservation Letters

SN - 1755-263X

IS - 4

ER -