How important are Iowa and New Hampshire to winning post-reform presidential nominations?

Randall E. Adkins, Andrew J. Dowdle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While conventional wisdom holds that the first delegate selection events in Iowa and New Hampshire are important influences on the outcome of the presidential selection process, scholars increasingly question whether victories in these "bellwether" contests are sufficient to propel darkhorse candidates to the nomination. This study utilizes four OLS regression models to predict nomination outcomes from 1980 to 1996 where the incumbent president did not sit for reelection. Earlier research demonstrated the possibility of forecasting presidential nominations by examining the results of (1) public opinion polls; FEC records regarding (2) money raised; and (3) cash reserves; and (4) whether candidates were southern Democrats (Mayer 1996a; Adkins and Dowdle 2000). Utilizing measures representing the outcome of the Iowa caucuses and the New Hampshire primary, this study contrasts the effect of momentum from these early contests on final primary vote totals. Evidence suggests that New Hampshire plays a role in determining the ordinal ranking of candidate finishes, but not necessarily the winner of the party nomination.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)431-444
Number of pages14
JournalPolitical Research Quarterly
Volume54
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2001

Fingerprint

candidacy
reform
opinion poll
wisdom
public opinion
ranking
voter
money
president
regression
event
evidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

How important are Iowa and New Hampshire to winning post-reform presidential nominations? / Adkins, Randall E.; Dowdle, Andrew J.

In: Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 54, No. 2, 06.2001, p. 431-444.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{553dbf6453dc423cb84fea5e63091e7a,
title = "How important are Iowa and New Hampshire to winning post-reform presidential nominations?",
abstract = "While conventional wisdom holds that the first delegate selection events in Iowa and New Hampshire are important influences on the outcome of the presidential selection process, scholars increasingly question whether victories in these {"}bellwether{"} contests are sufficient to propel darkhorse candidates to the nomination. This study utilizes four OLS regression models to predict nomination outcomes from 1980 to 1996 where the incumbent president did not sit for reelection. Earlier research demonstrated the possibility of forecasting presidential nominations by examining the results of (1) public opinion polls; FEC records regarding (2) money raised; and (3) cash reserves; and (4) whether candidates were southern Democrats (Mayer 1996a; Adkins and Dowdle 2000). Utilizing measures representing the outcome of the Iowa caucuses and the New Hampshire primary, this study contrasts the effect of momentum from these early contests on final primary vote totals. Evidence suggests that New Hampshire plays a role in determining the ordinal ranking of candidate finishes, but not necessarily the winner of the party nomination.",
author = "Adkins, {Randall E.} and Dowdle, {Andrew J.}",
year = "2001",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1177/106591290105400210",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "431--444",
journal = "Political Research Quarterly",
issn = "1065-9129",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How important are Iowa and New Hampshire to winning post-reform presidential nominations?

AU - Adkins, Randall E.

AU - Dowdle, Andrew J.

PY - 2001/6

Y1 - 2001/6

N2 - While conventional wisdom holds that the first delegate selection events in Iowa and New Hampshire are important influences on the outcome of the presidential selection process, scholars increasingly question whether victories in these "bellwether" contests are sufficient to propel darkhorse candidates to the nomination. This study utilizes four OLS regression models to predict nomination outcomes from 1980 to 1996 where the incumbent president did not sit for reelection. Earlier research demonstrated the possibility of forecasting presidential nominations by examining the results of (1) public opinion polls; FEC records regarding (2) money raised; and (3) cash reserves; and (4) whether candidates were southern Democrats (Mayer 1996a; Adkins and Dowdle 2000). Utilizing measures representing the outcome of the Iowa caucuses and the New Hampshire primary, this study contrasts the effect of momentum from these early contests on final primary vote totals. Evidence suggests that New Hampshire plays a role in determining the ordinal ranking of candidate finishes, but not necessarily the winner of the party nomination.

AB - While conventional wisdom holds that the first delegate selection events in Iowa and New Hampshire are important influences on the outcome of the presidential selection process, scholars increasingly question whether victories in these "bellwether" contests are sufficient to propel darkhorse candidates to the nomination. This study utilizes four OLS regression models to predict nomination outcomes from 1980 to 1996 where the incumbent president did not sit for reelection. Earlier research demonstrated the possibility of forecasting presidential nominations by examining the results of (1) public opinion polls; FEC records regarding (2) money raised; and (3) cash reserves; and (4) whether candidates were southern Democrats (Mayer 1996a; Adkins and Dowdle 2000). Utilizing measures representing the outcome of the Iowa caucuses and the New Hampshire primary, this study contrasts the effect of momentum from these early contests on final primary vote totals. Evidence suggests that New Hampshire plays a role in determining the ordinal ranking of candidate finishes, but not necessarily the winner of the party nomination.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0040433176&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0040433176&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/106591290105400210

DO - 10.1177/106591290105400210

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0040433176

VL - 54

SP - 431

EP - 444

JO - Political Research Quarterly

JF - Political Research Quarterly

SN - 1065-9129

IS - 2

ER -