How does age affect baseline screening mammography performance measures? A decision model

John D. Keen, James E. Keen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. In order to promote consumer-oriented informed medical decision-making regarding screening mammography, we created a decision model to predict the age dependence of the cancer detection rate, the recall rate and the secondary performance measures (positive predictive values, total intervention rate, and positive biopsy fraction) for a baseline mammogram. Methods. We constructed a decision tree to model the possible outcomes of a baseline screening mammogram in women ages 35 to 65. We compared the single baseline screening mammogram decision with the no screening alternative. We used the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results national cancer database as the primary input to estimate cancer prevalence. For other probabilities, the model used population-based estimates for screening mammography accuracy and diagnostic mammography outcomes specific to baseline exams. We varied radiologist performance for screening accuracy. Results. The cancer detection rate increases from 1.9/1000 at age 40 to 7.2/1000 at age 50 to 15.1/1000 at age 60. The recall rate remains relatively stable at 142-157/1000, which varies from 73-236/1000 at age 50 depending on radiologist performance. The positive predictive value of a screening mammogram increases from 1.3% at age 40 to 9.8% at age 60, while the positive predictive value of a diagnostic mammogram varies from 2.9% at age 40 to 19.2% at age 60. The model predicts the total intervention rate = 0.013*AGE2 - 0.67*AGE + 40, or 34/1000 at age 40 to 47/1000 at age 60. Therefore, the positive biopsy (intervention) fraction varies from 6% at age 40 to 32% at age 60. Conclusion. Breast cancer prevalence, the cancer detection rate, and all secondary screening mammography performance measures increase substantially with age.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number40
JournalBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Volume8
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 16 2008

Fingerprint

Mammography
Neoplasms
Biopsy
Decision Trees
Epidemiology
Databases
Breast Neoplasms
Population
Radiologists

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Health Informatics

Cite this

@article{79f31b57b68a48fab6f22287dfda518c,
title = "How does age affect baseline screening mammography performance measures? A decision model",
abstract = "Background. In order to promote consumer-oriented informed medical decision-making regarding screening mammography, we created a decision model to predict the age dependence of the cancer detection rate, the recall rate and the secondary performance measures (positive predictive values, total intervention rate, and positive biopsy fraction) for a baseline mammogram. Methods. We constructed a decision tree to model the possible outcomes of a baseline screening mammogram in women ages 35 to 65. We compared the single baseline screening mammogram decision with the no screening alternative. We used the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results national cancer database as the primary input to estimate cancer prevalence. For other probabilities, the model used population-based estimates for screening mammography accuracy and diagnostic mammography outcomes specific to baseline exams. We varied radiologist performance for screening accuracy. Results. The cancer detection rate increases from 1.9/1000 at age 40 to 7.2/1000 at age 50 to 15.1/1000 at age 60. The recall rate remains relatively stable at 142-157/1000, which varies from 73-236/1000 at age 50 depending on radiologist performance. The positive predictive value of a screening mammogram increases from 1.3{\%} at age 40 to 9.8{\%} at age 60, while the positive predictive value of a diagnostic mammogram varies from 2.9{\%} at age 40 to 19.2{\%} at age 60. The model predicts the total intervention rate = 0.013*AGE2 - 0.67*AGE + 40, or 34/1000 at age 40 to 47/1000 at age 60. Therefore, the positive biopsy (intervention) fraction varies from 6{\%} at age 40 to 32{\%} at age 60. Conclusion. Breast cancer prevalence, the cancer detection rate, and all secondary screening mammography performance measures increase substantially with age.",
author = "Keen, {John D.} and Keen, {James E.}",
year = "2008",
month = "10",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1186/1472-6947-8-40",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
journal = "BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making",
issn = "1472-6947",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How does age affect baseline screening mammography performance measures? A decision model

AU - Keen, John D.

AU - Keen, James E.

PY - 2008/10/16

Y1 - 2008/10/16

N2 - Background. In order to promote consumer-oriented informed medical decision-making regarding screening mammography, we created a decision model to predict the age dependence of the cancer detection rate, the recall rate and the secondary performance measures (positive predictive values, total intervention rate, and positive biopsy fraction) for a baseline mammogram. Methods. We constructed a decision tree to model the possible outcomes of a baseline screening mammogram in women ages 35 to 65. We compared the single baseline screening mammogram decision with the no screening alternative. We used the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results national cancer database as the primary input to estimate cancer prevalence. For other probabilities, the model used population-based estimates for screening mammography accuracy and diagnostic mammography outcomes specific to baseline exams. We varied radiologist performance for screening accuracy. Results. The cancer detection rate increases from 1.9/1000 at age 40 to 7.2/1000 at age 50 to 15.1/1000 at age 60. The recall rate remains relatively stable at 142-157/1000, which varies from 73-236/1000 at age 50 depending on radiologist performance. The positive predictive value of a screening mammogram increases from 1.3% at age 40 to 9.8% at age 60, while the positive predictive value of a diagnostic mammogram varies from 2.9% at age 40 to 19.2% at age 60. The model predicts the total intervention rate = 0.013*AGE2 - 0.67*AGE + 40, or 34/1000 at age 40 to 47/1000 at age 60. Therefore, the positive biopsy (intervention) fraction varies from 6% at age 40 to 32% at age 60. Conclusion. Breast cancer prevalence, the cancer detection rate, and all secondary screening mammography performance measures increase substantially with age.

AB - Background. In order to promote consumer-oriented informed medical decision-making regarding screening mammography, we created a decision model to predict the age dependence of the cancer detection rate, the recall rate and the secondary performance measures (positive predictive values, total intervention rate, and positive biopsy fraction) for a baseline mammogram. Methods. We constructed a decision tree to model the possible outcomes of a baseline screening mammogram in women ages 35 to 65. We compared the single baseline screening mammogram decision with the no screening alternative. We used the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results national cancer database as the primary input to estimate cancer prevalence. For other probabilities, the model used population-based estimates for screening mammography accuracy and diagnostic mammography outcomes specific to baseline exams. We varied radiologist performance for screening accuracy. Results. The cancer detection rate increases from 1.9/1000 at age 40 to 7.2/1000 at age 50 to 15.1/1000 at age 60. The recall rate remains relatively stable at 142-157/1000, which varies from 73-236/1000 at age 50 depending on radiologist performance. The positive predictive value of a screening mammogram increases from 1.3% at age 40 to 9.8% at age 60, while the positive predictive value of a diagnostic mammogram varies from 2.9% at age 40 to 19.2% at age 60. The model predicts the total intervention rate = 0.013*AGE2 - 0.67*AGE + 40, or 34/1000 at age 40 to 47/1000 at age 60. Therefore, the positive biopsy (intervention) fraction varies from 6% at age 40 to 32% at age 60. Conclusion. Breast cancer prevalence, the cancer detection rate, and all secondary screening mammography performance measures increase substantially with age.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=53649100535&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=53649100535&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1472-6947-8-40

DO - 10.1186/1472-6947-8-40

M3 - Article

C2 - 18803871

AN - SCOPUS:53649100535

VL - 8

JO - BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

JF - BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

SN - 1472-6947

M1 - 40

ER -