How children with special needs travel with their parents

Observed versus reported use of vehicle restraints

Taube Korn, Michal Katz-Leurer, Shirley Meyer, Rosa Gofin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES. The difficulties entailed in transporting children with special physical and behavioral needs could influence child restraint misuse and nonuse within this population. Although parental interview is often used to assess child vehicle restraint use, little research had been performed to validate this approach, and none has been done in the special-needs population. The objectives of this study were to assess the prevalence of nonuse and misuse of child restraints in the special-needs population and to assess the validity of using parental report as a measure of child restraint use. METHODS. Restraint use in 115 children with special needs, aged 0 to 18 years, was observed on their arrival at the parking lot of the Alyn Hospital Pediatric Rehabilitation Center in Jerusalem. The observation noted type of restraint used or absence thereof. If a restraint was used, correct use/misuse was recorded. In 94 cases, the parents were interviewed later that day in the clinic. RESULTS. Seventy percent of the children were observed as traveling unrestrained or with a restraint that was grossly misused to the extent that it provided no meaningful protection. The remaining children were observed displaying a variety of errors in the selection or use of the restraint that compromised their safety to varying degrees. Analysis of the observation results versus parental reporting revealed a 44% overreporting of child restraint use. Sensitivity was 71%, and specificity was 86%. CONCLUSIONS. The high prevalence of restraint nonuse and misuse within the specialneeds population defines this as a population at risk and emphasizes the need for intervention. Cautious interpretation is required of information acquired from parental reporting of child restraint use. The results of this study should raise awareness among professionals working with children with special needs as to the need for tailored assessment and intervention in the area of child-passenger safety.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPediatrics
Volume119
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2007

Fingerprint

Parents
Population
Observation
Safety
Rehabilitation Centers
Pediatric Hospitals
Needs Assessment
Interviews
Research

Keywords

  • Car seats
  • Child-passenger safety
  • Disabilities
  • Special needs
  • Validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

How children with special needs travel with their parents : Observed versus reported use of vehicle restraints. / Korn, Taube; Katz-Leurer, Michal; Meyer, Shirley; Gofin, Rosa.

In: Pediatrics, Vol. 119, No. 3, 01.03.2007.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Korn, Taube ; Katz-Leurer, Michal ; Meyer, Shirley ; Gofin, Rosa. / How children with special needs travel with their parents : Observed versus reported use of vehicle restraints. In: Pediatrics. 2007 ; Vol. 119, No. 3.
@article{d0f9a09685344d07b7b5d73f43bce3a3,
title = "How children with special needs travel with their parents: Observed versus reported use of vehicle restraints",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES. The difficulties entailed in transporting children with special physical and behavioral needs could influence child restraint misuse and nonuse within this population. Although parental interview is often used to assess child vehicle restraint use, little research had been performed to validate this approach, and none has been done in the special-needs population. The objectives of this study were to assess the prevalence of nonuse and misuse of child restraints in the special-needs population and to assess the validity of using parental report as a measure of child restraint use. METHODS. Restraint use in 115 children with special needs, aged 0 to 18 years, was observed on their arrival at the parking lot of the Alyn Hospital Pediatric Rehabilitation Center in Jerusalem. The observation noted type of restraint used or absence thereof. If a restraint was used, correct use/misuse was recorded. In 94 cases, the parents were interviewed later that day in the clinic. RESULTS. Seventy percent of the children were observed as traveling unrestrained or with a restraint that was grossly misused to the extent that it provided no meaningful protection. The remaining children were observed displaying a variety of errors in the selection or use of the restraint that compromised their safety to varying degrees. Analysis of the observation results versus parental reporting revealed a 44{\%} overreporting of child restraint use. Sensitivity was 71{\%}, and specificity was 86{\%}. CONCLUSIONS. The high prevalence of restraint nonuse and misuse within the specialneeds population defines this as a population at risk and emphasizes the need for intervention. Cautious interpretation is required of information acquired from parental reporting of child restraint use. The results of this study should raise awareness among professionals working with children with special needs as to the need for tailored assessment and intervention in the area of child-passenger safety.",
keywords = "Car seats, Child-passenger safety, Disabilities, Special needs, Validity",
author = "Taube Korn and Michal Katz-Leurer and Shirley Meyer and Rosa Gofin",
year = "2007",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1542/peds.2006-1323",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "119",
journal = "Pediatrics",
issn = "0031-4005",
publisher = "American Academy of Pediatrics",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How children with special needs travel with their parents

T2 - Observed versus reported use of vehicle restraints

AU - Korn, Taube

AU - Katz-Leurer, Michal

AU - Meyer, Shirley

AU - Gofin, Rosa

PY - 2007/3/1

Y1 - 2007/3/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES. The difficulties entailed in transporting children with special physical and behavioral needs could influence child restraint misuse and nonuse within this population. Although parental interview is often used to assess child vehicle restraint use, little research had been performed to validate this approach, and none has been done in the special-needs population. The objectives of this study were to assess the prevalence of nonuse and misuse of child restraints in the special-needs population and to assess the validity of using parental report as a measure of child restraint use. METHODS. Restraint use in 115 children with special needs, aged 0 to 18 years, was observed on their arrival at the parking lot of the Alyn Hospital Pediatric Rehabilitation Center in Jerusalem. The observation noted type of restraint used or absence thereof. If a restraint was used, correct use/misuse was recorded. In 94 cases, the parents were interviewed later that day in the clinic. RESULTS. Seventy percent of the children were observed as traveling unrestrained or with a restraint that was grossly misused to the extent that it provided no meaningful protection. The remaining children were observed displaying a variety of errors in the selection or use of the restraint that compromised their safety to varying degrees. Analysis of the observation results versus parental reporting revealed a 44% overreporting of child restraint use. Sensitivity was 71%, and specificity was 86%. CONCLUSIONS. The high prevalence of restraint nonuse and misuse within the specialneeds population defines this as a population at risk and emphasizes the need for intervention. Cautious interpretation is required of information acquired from parental reporting of child restraint use. The results of this study should raise awareness among professionals working with children with special needs as to the need for tailored assessment and intervention in the area of child-passenger safety.

AB - OBJECTIVES. The difficulties entailed in transporting children with special physical and behavioral needs could influence child restraint misuse and nonuse within this population. Although parental interview is often used to assess child vehicle restraint use, little research had been performed to validate this approach, and none has been done in the special-needs population. The objectives of this study were to assess the prevalence of nonuse and misuse of child restraints in the special-needs population and to assess the validity of using parental report as a measure of child restraint use. METHODS. Restraint use in 115 children with special needs, aged 0 to 18 years, was observed on their arrival at the parking lot of the Alyn Hospital Pediatric Rehabilitation Center in Jerusalem. The observation noted type of restraint used or absence thereof. If a restraint was used, correct use/misuse was recorded. In 94 cases, the parents were interviewed later that day in the clinic. RESULTS. Seventy percent of the children were observed as traveling unrestrained or with a restraint that was grossly misused to the extent that it provided no meaningful protection. The remaining children were observed displaying a variety of errors in the selection or use of the restraint that compromised their safety to varying degrees. Analysis of the observation results versus parental reporting revealed a 44% overreporting of child restraint use. Sensitivity was 71%, and specificity was 86%. CONCLUSIONS. The high prevalence of restraint nonuse and misuse within the specialneeds population defines this as a population at risk and emphasizes the need for intervention. Cautious interpretation is required of information acquired from parental reporting of child restraint use. The results of this study should raise awareness among professionals working with children with special needs as to the need for tailored assessment and intervention in the area of child-passenger safety.

KW - Car seats

KW - Child-passenger safety

KW - Disabilities

KW - Special needs

KW - Validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33947107877&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33947107877&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1542/peds.2006-1323

DO - 10.1542/peds.2006-1323

M3 - Article

VL - 119

JO - Pediatrics

JF - Pediatrics

SN - 0031-4005

IS - 3

ER -