Hot or cold? Is monothermal caloric testing useful and cost-effective?

Matthew L. Bush, Christopher M Bingcang, Edward T. Chang, Brandon Fornwalt, Christopher Rayle, Thomas J. Gal, Raleigh O. Jones, Jennifer B. Shinn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Videonystagmography (VNG) is used widely in the assessment of balance dysfunction. The full test battery can be time-consuming and can induce patient discomfort. The purpose of this study was to examine the value of monothermal caloric testing in predicting unilateral caloric weakness, as well as abnormal VNG vestibular and nonvestibular eye movement, while considering the time and reimbursement associated with these tests. Methods: In a retrospective review of 645 patients who completed a comprehensive VNG test battery with bithermal caloric testing, we calculated the specificity, sensitivity, and predictive values of monothermal caloric testing in relation to bithermal caloric results and noncaloric VNG results. Results: With unilateral vestibular weakness (UVW) defined as a 25% interear difference, warm-air monothermal caloric testing yielded a sensitivity of 87% and a negative predictive value of 90% for predicting UVW. With a 10% UVW definition, the warm-air caloric testing sensitivity increased to 95% and the negative predictive value to 92%. Warm-air monothermal caloric testing had a positive predictive value of 85% and a negative predictive value of 18% for predicting noncaloric VNG findings; cold-air monothermal and bithermal testing displayed similar results. Conclusions: Isolated monothermal testing is a sensitive screening tool for detecting UVW, but is not adequate for predicting noncaloric VNG results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)404-411
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology
Volume122
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

Fingerprint

Air
Costs and Cost Analysis
Eye Movements
Sensitivity and Specificity

Keywords

  • Cost-effectiveness
  • Electronystagmography
  • Monothermal caloric testing
  • Videonystagmography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Bush, M. L., Bingcang, C. M., Chang, E. T., Fornwalt, B., Rayle, C., Gal, T. J., ... Shinn, J. B. (2013). Hot or cold? Is monothermal caloric testing useful and cost-effective? Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 122(6), 404-411.

Hot or cold? Is monothermal caloric testing useful and cost-effective? / Bush, Matthew L.; Bingcang, Christopher M; Chang, Edward T.; Fornwalt, Brandon; Rayle, Christopher; Gal, Thomas J.; Jones, Raleigh O.; Shinn, Jennifer B.

In: Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, Vol. 122, No. 6, 01.01.2013, p. 404-411.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bush, ML, Bingcang, CM, Chang, ET, Fornwalt, B, Rayle, C, Gal, TJ, Jones, RO & Shinn, JB 2013, 'Hot or cold? Is monothermal caloric testing useful and cost-effective?', Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, vol. 122, no. 6, pp. 404-411.
Bush, Matthew L. ; Bingcang, Christopher M ; Chang, Edward T. ; Fornwalt, Brandon ; Rayle, Christopher ; Gal, Thomas J. ; Jones, Raleigh O. ; Shinn, Jennifer B. / Hot or cold? Is monothermal caloric testing useful and cost-effective?. In: Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology. 2013 ; Vol. 122, No. 6. pp. 404-411.
@article{32ccb36e6ecb4d37b868e8a29e44ea9d,
title = "Hot or cold? Is monothermal caloric testing useful and cost-effective?",
abstract = "Objectives: Videonystagmography (VNG) is used widely in the assessment of balance dysfunction. The full test battery can be time-consuming and can induce patient discomfort. The purpose of this study was to examine the value of monothermal caloric testing in predicting unilateral caloric weakness, as well as abnormal VNG vestibular and nonvestibular eye movement, while considering the time and reimbursement associated with these tests. Methods: In a retrospective review of 645 patients who completed a comprehensive VNG test battery with bithermal caloric testing, we calculated the specificity, sensitivity, and predictive values of monothermal caloric testing in relation to bithermal caloric results and noncaloric VNG results. Results: With unilateral vestibular weakness (UVW) defined as a 25{\%} interear difference, warm-air monothermal caloric testing yielded a sensitivity of 87{\%} and a negative predictive value of 90{\%} for predicting UVW. With a 10{\%} UVW definition, the warm-air caloric testing sensitivity increased to 95{\%} and the negative predictive value to 92{\%}. Warm-air monothermal caloric testing had a positive predictive value of 85{\%} and a negative predictive value of 18{\%} for predicting noncaloric VNG findings; cold-air monothermal and bithermal testing displayed similar results. Conclusions: Isolated monothermal testing is a sensitive screening tool for detecting UVW, but is not adequate for predicting noncaloric VNG results.",
keywords = "Cost-effectiveness, Electronystagmography, Monothermal caloric testing, Videonystagmography",
author = "Bush, {Matthew L.} and Bingcang, {Christopher M} and Chang, {Edward T.} and Brandon Fornwalt and Christopher Rayle and Gal, {Thomas J.} and Jones, {Raleigh O.} and Shinn, {Jennifer B.}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "122",
pages = "404--411",
journal = "Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology",
issn = "0003-4894",
publisher = "Annals Publishing Company",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hot or cold? Is monothermal caloric testing useful and cost-effective?

AU - Bush, Matthew L.

AU - Bingcang, Christopher M

AU - Chang, Edward T.

AU - Fornwalt, Brandon

AU - Rayle, Christopher

AU - Gal, Thomas J.

AU - Jones, Raleigh O.

AU - Shinn, Jennifer B.

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Objectives: Videonystagmography (VNG) is used widely in the assessment of balance dysfunction. The full test battery can be time-consuming and can induce patient discomfort. The purpose of this study was to examine the value of monothermal caloric testing in predicting unilateral caloric weakness, as well as abnormal VNG vestibular and nonvestibular eye movement, while considering the time and reimbursement associated with these tests. Methods: In a retrospective review of 645 patients who completed a comprehensive VNG test battery with bithermal caloric testing, we calculated the specificity, sensitivity, and predictive values of monothermal caloric testing in relation to bithermal caloric results and noncaloric VNG results. Results: With unilateral vestibular weakness (UVW) defined as a 25% interear difference, warm-air monothermal caloric testing yielded a sensitivity of 87% and a negative predictive value of 90% for predicting UVW. With a 10% UVW definition, the warm-air caloric testing sensitivity increased to 95% and the negative predictive value to 92%. Warm-air monothermal caloric testing had a positive predictive value of 85% and a negative predictive value of 18% for predicting noncaloric VNG findings; cold-air monothermal and bithermal testing displayed similar results. Conclusions: Isolated monothermal testing is a sensitive screening tool for detecting UVW, but is not adequate for predicting noncaloric VNG results.

AB - Objectives: Videonystagmography (VNG) is used widely in the assessment of balance dysfunction. The full test battery can be time-consuming and can induce patient discomfort. The purpose of this study was to examine the value of monothermal caloric testing in predicting unilateral caloric weakness, as well as abnormal VNG vestibular and nonvestibular eye movement, while considering the time and reimbursement associated with these tests. Methods: In a retrospective review of 645 patients who completed a comprehensive VNG test battery with bithermal caloric testing, we calculated the specificity, sensitivity, and predictive values of monothermal caloric testing in relation to bithermal caloric results and noncaloric VNG results. Results: With unilateral vestibular weakness (UVW) defined as a 25% interear difference, warm-air monothermal caloric testing yielded a sensitivity of 87% and a negative predictive value of 90% for predicting UVW. With a 10% UVW definition, the warm-air caloric testing sensitivity increased to 95% and the negative predictive value to 92%. Warm-air monothermal caloric testing had a positive predictive value of 85% and a negative predictive value of 18% for predicting noncaloric VNG findings; cold-air monothermal and bithermal testing displayed similar results. Conclusions: Isolated monothermal testing is a sensitive screening tool for detecting UVW, but is not adequate for predicting noncaloric VNG results.

KW - Cost-effectiveness

KW - Electronystagmography

KW - Monothermal caloric testing

KW - Videonystagmography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878898131&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878898131&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 122

SP - 404

EP - 411

JO - Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology

JF - Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology

SN - 0003-4894

IS - 6

ER -