History of neurosurgical techniques in head injury

W. Thorell, B. Aarabi

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

For many centuries, surgical procedures had to be fast and sharp. Suppuration of the surgical wounds was not the exception but the rule. The Hippocratic tradition of wet wound management and the concept of laudable pus was seriously challenged in the fourteenth century. When cauterization was opposed by Paré in the sixteenth century, the patients suffered less and the wounds healed better. Surgeons learned about the significance of brain compression during the second half of the eighteenth century. With the introduction of asepsis, antiseptics, cerebral localization, and anesthesia during the second half of the nineteenth century, trephination became more attractive and less fatal. For the first time, surgeons broached the dura with impunity, feeling confident that they could take care of a compressive pathology with a good chance that the patient could survive intracranial sepsis. Imaging studies, antibiotics, electrocautery, and mechanical suction during World War II made surgical procedures safe, anatomically sound, and results predictable. Sectional imaging of the 1970s and 1980s made it possible to evaluate the intracranial pathologies and correlate them with pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury, hence, surgeons were able to predict outcomes more efficiently.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)11-22
Number of pages12
JournalNeurosurgery Clinics of North America
Volume12
Issue number1
StatePublished - Feb 26 2001

Fingerprint

Craniocerebral Trauma
Suppuration
Asepsis
Trephining
Pathology
Cautery
World War II
Electrocoagulation
Local Anti-Infective Agents
Wounds and Injuries
Suction
Sepsis
Emotions
Anesthesia
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Brain
Surgeons

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

History of neurosurgical techniques in head injury. / Thorell, W.; Aarabi, B.

In: Neurosurgery Clinics of North America, Vol. 12, No. 1, 26.02.2001, p. 11-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{29938b19f6924dce8071fd739ceccd5f,
title = "History of neurosurgical techniques in head injury",
abstract = "For many centuries, surgical procedures had to be fast and sharp. Suppuration of the surgical wounds was not the exception but the rule. The Hippocratic tradition of wet wound management and the concept of laudable pus was seriously challenged in the fourteenth century. When cauterization was opposed by Par{\'e} in the sixteenth century, the patients suffered less and the wounds healed better. Surgeons learned about the significance of brain compression during the second half of the eighteenth century. With the introduction of asepsis, antiseptics, cerebral localization, and anesthesia during the second half of the nineteenth century, trephination became more attractive and less fatal. For the first time, surgeons broached the dura with impunity, feeling confident that they could take care of a compressive pathology with a good chance that the patient could survive intracranial sepsis. Imaging studies, antibiotics, electrocautery, and mechanical suction during World War II made surgical procedures safe, anatomically sound, and results predictable. Sectional imaging of the 1970s and 1980s made it possible to evaluate the intracranial pathologies and correlate them with pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury, hence, surgeons were able to predict outcomes more efficiently.",
author = "W. Thorell and B. Aarabi",
year = "2001",
month = "2",
day = "26",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "11--22",
journal = "Neurosurgery Clinics of North America",
issn = "1042-3680",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - History of neurosurgical techniques in head injury

AU - Thorell, W.

AU - Aarabi, B.

PY - 2001/2/26

Y1 - 2001/2/26

N2 - For many centuries, surgical procedures had to be fast and sharp. Suppuration of the surgical wounds was not the exception but the rule. The Hippocratic tradition of wet wound management and the concept of laudable pus was seriously challenged in the fourteenth century. When cauterization was opposed by Paré in the sixteenth century, the patients suffered less and the wounds healed better. Surgeons learned about the significance of brain compression during the second half of the eighteenth century. With the introduction of asepsis, antiseptics, cerebral localization, and anesthesia during the second half of the nineteenth century, trephination became more attractive and less fatal. For the first time, surgeons broached the dura with impunity, feeling confident that they could take care of a compressive pathology with a good chance that the patient could survive intracranial sepsis. Imaging studies, antibiotics, electrocautery, and mechanical suction during World War II made surgical procedures safe, anatomically sound, and results predictable. Sectional imaging of the 1970s and 1980s made it possible to evaluate the intracranial pathologies and correlate them with pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury, hence, surgeons were able to predict outcomes more efficiently.

AB - For many centuries, surgical procedures had to be fast and sharp. Suppuration of the surgical wounds was not the exception but the rule. The Hippocratic tradition of wet wound management and the concept of laudable pus was seriously challenged in the fourteenth century. When cauterization was opposed by Paré in the sixteenth century, the patients suffered less and the wounds healed better. Surgeons learned about the significance of brain compression during the second half of the eighteenth century. With the introduction of asepsis, antiseptics, cerebral localization, and anesthesia during the second half of the nineteenth century, trephination became more attractive and less fatal. For the first time, surgeons broached the dura with impunity, feeling confident that they could take care of a compressive pathology with a good chance that the patient could survive intracranial sepsis. Imaging studies, antibiotics, electrocautery, and mechanical suction during World War II made surgical procedures safe, anatomically sound, and results predictable. Sectional imaging of the 1970s and 1980s made it possible to evaluate the intracranial pathologies and correlate them with pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury, hence, surgeons were able to predict outcomes more efficiently.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035129249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035129249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

C2 - 11175985

AN - SCOPUS:0035129249

VL - 12

SP - 11

EP - 22

JO - Neurosurgery Clinics of North America

JF - Neurosurgery Clinics of North America

SN - 1042-3680

IS - 1

ER -