High muscle co-contraction does not result in high joint forces during gait in anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees

Ashutosh Khandha, Kurt Manal, Jacob Capin, Elizabeth A Wellsandt, Adam Marmon, Lynn Snyder-Mackler, Thomas S. Buchanan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The mechanism of knee osteoarthritis development after anterior cruciate ligament injuries is poorly understood. The objective of this study was to evaluate knee gait variables, muscle co-contraction indices and knee joint loading in young subjects with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency (ACLD, n = 36), versus control subjects (n = 12). A validated, electromyography-informed model was used to estimate joint loading. For the involved limb of ACLD subjects versus control, muscle co-contraction indices were higher for the medial (p = 0.018, effect size = 0.93) and lateral (p = 0.028, effect size = 0.83) agonist–antagonist muscle pairs. Despite higher muscle co-contraction, medial compartment contact force was lower for the involved limb, compared to both the uninvolved limb (mean difference = 0.39 body weight, p = 0.009, effect size = 0.70) as well as the control limb (mean difference = 0.57 body weight, p = 0.007, effect size = 1.14). Similar observations were made for total contact force. For involved versus uninvolved limb, the ACLD group demonstrated lower vertical ground reaction force (mean difference = 0.08 body weight, p = 0.010, effect size = 0.70) and knee flexion moment (mean difference = 1.32% body weight * height, p = 0.003, effect size = 0.76), during weight acceptance. These results indicate that high muscle co-contraction does not always result in high knee joint loading, which is thought to be associated with knee osteoarthritis. Long-term follow-up is required to evaluate how gait alterations progress in non-osteoarthritic versus osteoarthritic subjects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)104-112
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Orthopaedic Research
Volume37
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Anterior Cruciate Ligament
Muscle Contraction
Gait
Knee
Extremities
Body Weight
Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Joint
Body Height
Electromyography
Lower Extremity
Joints
Weights and Measures
Muscles

Keywords

  • ACL
  • joint forces
  • knee
  • muscle co-contraction
  • musculoskeletal modeling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

High muscle co-contraction does not result in high joint forces during gait in anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees. / Khandha, Ashutosh; Manal, Kurt; Capin, Jacob; Wellsandt, Elizabeth A; Marmon, Adam; Snyder-Mackler, Lynn; Buchanan, Thomas S.

In: Journal of Orthopaedic Research, Vol. 37, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 104-112.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Khandha, Ashutosh ; Manal, Kurt ; Capin, Jacob ; Wellsandt, Elizabeth A ; Marmon, Adam ; Snyder-Mackler, Lynn ; Buchanan, Thomas S. / High muscle co-contraction does not result in high joint forces during gait in anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees. In: Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 2019 ; Vol. 37, No. 1. pp. 104-112.
@article{3d8f9aca52224697a6233cb9100fb90e,
title = "High muscle co-contraction does not result in high joint forces during gait in anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees",
abstract = "The mechanism of knee osteoarthritis development after anterior cruciate ligament injuries is poorly understood. The objective of this study was to evaluate knee gait variables, muscle co-contraction indices and knee joint loading in young subjects with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency (ACLD, n = 36), versus control subjects (n = 12). A validated, electromyography-informed model was used to estimate joint loading. For the involved limb of ACLD subjects versus control, muscle co-contraction indices were higher for the medial (p = 0.018, effect size = 0.93) and lateral (p = 0.028, effect size = 0.83) agonist–antagonist muscle pairs. Despite higher muscle co-contraction, medial compartment contact force was lower for the involved limb, compared to both the uninvolved limb (mean difference = 0.39 body weight, p = 0.009, effect size = 0.70) as well as the control limb (mean difference = 0.57 body weight, p = 0.007, effect size = 1.14). Similar observations were made for total contact force. For involved versus uninvolved limb, the ACLD group demonstrated lower vertical ground reaction force (mean difference = 0.08 body weight, p = 0.010, effect size = 0.70) and knee flexion moment (mean difference = 1.32{\%} body weight * height, p = 0.003, effect size = 0.76), during weight acceptance. These results indicate that high muscle co-contraction does not always result in high knee joint loading, which is thought to be associated with knee osteoarthritis. Long-term follow-up is required to evaluate how gait alterations progress in non-osteoarthritic versus osteoarthritic subjects.",
keywords = "ACL, joint forces, knee, muscle co-contraction, musculoskeletal modeling",
author = "Ashutosh Khandha and Kurt Manal and Jacob Capin and Wellsandt, {Elizabeth A} and Adam Marmon and Lynn Snyder-Mackler and Buchanan, {Thomas S.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/jor.24141",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "104--112",
journal = "Journal of Orthopaedic Research",
issn = "0736-0266",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - High muscle co-contraction does not result in high joint forces during gait in anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees

AU - Khandha, Ashutosh

AU - Manal, Kurt

AU - Capin, Jacob

AU - Wellsandt, Elizabeth A

AU - Marmon, Adam

AU - Snyder-Mackler, Lynn

AU - Buchanan, Thomas S.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - The mechanism of knee osteoarthritis development after anterior cruciate ligament injuries is poorly understood. The objective of this study was to evaluate knee gait variables, muscle co-contraction indices and knee joint loading in young subjects with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency (ACLD, n = 36), versus control subjects (n = 12). A validated, electromyography-informed model was used to estimate joint loading. For the involved limb of ACLD subjects versus control, muscle co-contraction indices were higher for the medial (p = 0.018, effect size = 0.93) and lateral (p = 0.028, effect size = 0.83) agonist–antagonist muscle pairs. Despite higher muscle co-contraction, medial compartment contact force was lower for the involved limb, compared to both the uninvolved limb (mean difference = 0.39 body weight, p = 0.009, effect size = 0.70) as well as the control limb (mean difference = 0.57 body weight, p = 0.007, effect size = 1.14). Similar observations were made for total contact force. For involved versus uninvolved limb, the ACLD group demonstrated lower vertical ground reaction force (mean difference = 0.08 body weight, p = 0.010, effect size = 0.70) and knee flexion moment (mean difference = 1.32% body weight * height, p = 0.003, effect size = 0.76), during weight acceptance. These results indicate that high muscle co-contraction does not always result in high knee joint loading, which is thought to be associated with knee osteoarthritis. Long-term follow-up is required to evaluate how gait alterations progress in non-osteoarthritic versus osteoarthritic subjects.

AB - The mechanism of knee osteoarthritis development after anterior cruciate ligament injuries is poorly understood. The objective of this study was to evaluate knee gait variables, muscle co-contraction indices and knee joint loading in young subjects with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency (ACLD, n = 36), versus control subjects (n = 12). A validated, electromyography-informed model was used to estimate joint loading. For the involved limb of ACLD subjects versus control, muscle co-contraction indices were higher for the medial (p = 0.018, effect size = 0.93) and lateral (p = 0.028, effect size = 0.83) agonist–antagonist muscle pairs. Despite higher muscle co-contraction, medial compartment contact force was lower for the involved limb, compared to both the uninvolved limb (mean difference = 0.39 body weight, p = 0.009, effect size = 0.70) as well as the control limb (mean difference = 0.57 body weight, p = 0.007, effect size = 1.14). Similar observations were made for total contact force. For involved versus uninvolved limb, the ACLD group demonstrated lower vertical ground reaction force (mean difference = 0.08 body weight, p = 0.010, effect size = 0.70) and knee flexion moment (mean difference = 1.32% body weight * height, p = 0.003, effect size = 0.76), during weight acceptance. These results indicate that high muscle co-contraction does not always result in high knee joint loading, which is thought to be associated with knee osteoarthritis. Long-term follow-up is required to evaluate how gait alterations progress in non-osteoarthritic versus osteoarthritic subjects.

KW - ACL

KW - joint forces

KW - knee

KW - muscle co-contraction

KW - musculoskeletal modeling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054648989&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054648989&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jor.24141

DO - 10.1002/jor.24141

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 104

EP - 112

JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Research

JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Research

SN - 0736-0266

IS - 1

ER -