Hemifield asymmetry in the potency of exogenous auditory and visual cues

Yamaya Sosa, Aaron M. Clarke, Mark McCourt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Neurologically normal subjects misperceive the midpoints of lines (PSE) as reliably leftward of veridical center, a phenomenon known as pseudoneglect. This leftward bias reflects the dominance of the right cerebral hemisphere in deploying spatial attention. Transient visual cues, delivered to either the left or right endpoints of lines, modulate PSE such that leftward biases are increased by leftward cues, and are decreased by rightward cues, relative to a no-cue control condition. We ask whether lateralized auditory cues can similarly influence PSE in a tachistoscopic visual line bisection task, and describe how visual and auditory cues, in spatially synergistic or antagonistic combinations, jointly influence PSE. Our results demonstrate that whereas auditory and visual cues both modulate PSE, visual cues are overall more potent than auditory cues. Visual and auditory cues are weighted such that visual cues are significantly more potent than auditory cues when visual cues are delivered to left hemispace. Visual and auditory cues are equipotent when visual cues are delivered to right hemispace. These results are consistent with the existence of independent lateralized networks governing the deployment of visuospatial and audiospatial attention. An analysis of the weighting of unisensory visual and auditory cues which optimally predicts PSE in multisensory cue conditions shows that cues combine additively. There was no evidence for a superadditive multisensory cue combination.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1207-1215
Number of pages9
JournalVision research
Volume51
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2011

Fingerprint

Cues
Cerebrum

Keywords

  • Audiospatial attention
  • Line bisection
  • Pseudoneglect
  • Spatial cueing
  • Ventriloquism
  • Visuospatial attention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Hemifield asymmetry in the potency of exogenous auditory and visual cues. / Sosa, Yamaya; Clarke, Aaron M.; McCourt, Mark.

In: Vision research, Vol. 51, No. 11, 01.06.2011, p. 1207-1215.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sosa, Yamaya ; Clarke, Aaron M. ; McCourt, Mark. / Hemifield asymmetry in the potency of exogenous auditory and visual cues. In: Vision research. 2011 ; Vol. 51, No. 11. pp. 1207-1215.
@article{1e60f40f53534f50a411127526313323,
title = "Hemifield asymmetry in the potency of exogenous auditory and visual cues",
abstract = "Neurologically normal subjects misperceive the midpoints of lines (PSE) as reliably leftward of veridical center, a phenomenon known as pseudoneglect. This leftward bias reflects the dominance of the right cerebral hemisphere in deploying spatial attention. Transient visual cues, delivered to either the left or right endpoints of lines, modulate PSE such that leftward biases are increased by leftward cues, and are decreased by rightward cues, relative to a no-cue control condition. We ask whether lateralized auditory cues can similarly influence PSE in a tachistoscopic visual line bisection task, and describe how visual and auditory cues, in spatially synergistic or antagonistic combinations, jointly influence PSE. Our results demonstrate that whereas auditory and visual cues both modulate PSE, visual cues are overall more potent than auditory cues. Visual and auditory cues are weighted such that visual cues are significantly more potent than auditory cues when visual cues are delivered to left hemispace. Visual and auditory cues are equipotent when visual cues are delivered to right hemispace. These results are consistent with the existence of independent lateralized networks governing the deployment of visuospatial and audiospatial attention. An analysis of the weighting of unisensory visual and auditory cues which optimally predicts PSE in multisensory cue conditions shows that cues combine additively. There was no evidence for a superadditive multisensory cue combination.",
keywords = "Audiospatial attention, Line bisection, Pseudoneglect, Spatial cueing, Ventriloquism, Visuospatial attention",
author = "Yamaya Sosa and Clarke, {Aaron M.} and Mark McCourt",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.visres.2011.03.012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "1207--1215",
journal = "Vision Research",
issn = "0042-6989",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hemifield asymmetry in the potency of exogenous auditory and visual cues

AU - Sosa, Yamaya

AU - Clarke, Aaron M.

AU - McCourt, Mark

PY - 2011/6/1

Y1 - 2011/6/1

N2 - Neurologically normal subjects misperceive the midpoints of lines (PSE) as reliably leftward of veridical center, a phenomenon known as pseudoneglect. This leftward bias reflects the dominance of the right cerebral hemisphere in deploying spatial attention. Transient visual cues, delivered to either the left or right endpoints of lines, modulate PSE such that leftward biases are increased by leftward cues, and are decreased by rightward cues, relative to a no-cue control condition. We ask whether lateralized auditory cues can similarly influence PSE in a tachistoscopic visual line bisection task, and describe how visual and auditory cues, in spatially synergistic or antagonistic combinations, jointly influence PSE. Our results demonstrate that whereas auditory and visual cues both modulate PSE, visual cues are overall more potent than auditory cues. Visual and auditory cues are weighted such that visual cues are significantly more potent than auditory cues when visual cues are delivered to left hemispace. Visual and auditory cues are equipotent when visual cues are delivered to right hemispace. These results are consistent with the existence of independent lateralized networks governing the deployment of visuospatial and audiospatial attention. An analysis of the weighting of unisensory visual and auditory cues which optimally predicts PSE in multisensory cue conditions shows that cues combine additively. There was no evidence for a superadditive multisensory cue combination.

AB - Neurologically normal subjects misperceive the midpoints of lines (PSE) as reliably leftward of veridical center, a phenomenon known as pseudoneglect. This leftward bias reflects the dominance of the right cerebral hemisphere in deploying spatial attention. Transient visual cues, delivered to either the left or right endpoints of lines, modulate PSE such that leftward biases are increased by leftward cues, and are decreased by rightward cues, relative to a no-cue control condition. We ask whether lateralized auditory cues can similarly influence PSE in a tachistoscopic visual line bisection task, and describe how visual and auditory cues, in spatially synergistic or antagonistic combinations, jointly influence PSE. Our results demonstrate that whereas auditory and visual cues both modulate PSE, visual cues are overall more potent than auditory cues. Visual and auditory cues are weighted such that visual cues are significantly more potent than auditory cues when visual cues are delivered to left hemispace. Visual and auditory cues are equipotent when visual cues are delivered to right hemispace. These results are consistent with the existence of independent lateralized networks governing the deployment of visuospatial and audiospatial attention. An analysis of the weighting of unisensory visual and auditory cues which optimally predicts PSE in multisensory cue conditions shows that cues combine additively. There was no evidence for a superadditive multisensory cue combination.

KW - Audiospatial attention

KW - Line bisection

KW - Pseudoneglect

KW - Spatial cueing

KW - Ventriloquism

KW - Visuospatial attention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955587943&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955587943&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.visres.2011.03.012

DO - 10.1016/j.visres.2011.03.012

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 1207

EP - 1215

JO - Vision Research

JF - Vision Research

SN - 0042-6989

IS - 11

ER -