Have Federal Sentencing Guidelines Reduced Severity? An Examination of One Circuit

Kimberly Kempf-Leonard, Lisa L. Sample

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Congress intended to make the sentencing process less discretionary and more equitable for similarly situated defendants when it passed the U.S. Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. Sentencing guidelines were devised to promote these changes. After more than a decade of implementation, however, little is known about the impact of the new policy. This paper examines sentences given between 1993 and 1994 in one federal circuit in an effort to determine whether this policy instrument has achieved success. The theoretical model of a rational case processing system (Gottfredson and Gottfredson, 1980) is used to guide the interpretation of our findings and the recommendations we offer for improvements.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)111-144
Number of pages34
JournalJournal of Quantitative Criminology
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2001

Fingerprint

act
Guidelines
reform
examination
interpretation
Theoretical Models

Keywords

  • Disparity
  • Equity
  • Guidelines
  • Sentencing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Law

Cite this

Have Federal Sentencing Guidelines Reduced Severity? An Examination of One Circuit. / Kempf-Leonard, Kimberly; Sample, Lisa L.

In: Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Vol. 17, No. 2, 01.12.2001, p. 111-144.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e3b73caf3ce64fd9abb3923018e8dde6,
title = "Have Federal Sentencing Guidelines Reduced Severity? An Examination of One Circuit",
abstract = "Congress intended to make the sentencing process less discretionary and more equitable for similarly situated defendants when it passed the U.S. Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. Sentencing guidelines were devised to promote these changes. After more than a decade of implementation, however, little is known about the impact of the new policy. This paper examines sentences given between 1993 and 1994 in one federal circuit in an effort to determine whether this policy instrument has achieved success. The theoretical model of a rational case processing system (Gottfredson and Gottfredson, 1980) is used to guide the interpretation of our findings and the recommendations we offer for improvements.",
keywords = "Disparity, Equity, Guidelines, Sentencing",
author = "Kimberly Kempf-Leonard and Sample, {Lisa L.}",
year = "2001",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1023/A:1011032013115",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "111--144",
journal = "Journal of Quantitative Criminology",
issn = "0748-4518",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Have Federal Sentencing Guidelines Reduced Severity? An Examination of One Circuit

AU - Kempf-Leonard, Kimberly

AU - Sample, Lisa L.

PY - 2001/12/1

Y1 - 2001/12/1

N2 - Congress intended to make the sentencing process less discretionary and more equitable for similarly situated defendants when it passed the U.S. Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. Sentencing guidelines were devised to promote these changes. After more than a decade of implementation, however, little is known about the impact of the new policy. This paper examines sentences given between 1993 and 1994 in one federal circuit in an effort to determine whether this policy instrument has achieved success. The theoretical model of a rational case processing system (Gottfredson and Gottfredson, 1980) is used to guide the interpretation of our findings and the recommendations we offer for improvements.

AB - Congress intended to make the sentencing process less discretionary and more equitable for similarly situated defendants when it passed the U.S. Sentencing Reform Act of 1984. Sentencing guidelines were devised to promote these changes. After more than a decade of implementation, however, little is known about the impact of the new policy. This paper examines sentences given between 1993 and 1994 in one federal circuit in an effort to determine whether this policy instrument has achieved success. The theoretical model of a rational case processing system (Gottfredson and Gottfredson, 1980) is used to guide the interpretation of our findings and the recommendations we offer for improvements.

KW - Disparity

KW - Equity

KW - Guidelines

KW - Sentencing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035637430&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035637430&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/A:1011032013115

DO - 10.1023/A:1011032013115

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0035637430

VL - 17

SP - 111

EP - 144

JO - Journal of Quantitative Criminology

JF - Journal of Quantitative Criminology

SN - 0748-4518

IS - 2

ER -