Hand tools design

Are biomechanical criteria the same as aesthetic criteria? A preliminary study

Adam D. Christensen, Ramaratnam R Bishu

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The perception of comfort and discomfort was investigated using a tactile knife-handle sorting task. Sixteen participants (13 males, 3 females) volunteered to perform the study. Due to the preliminary nature of this research the participants were acquaintances of the researchers. The participants were randomly assigned to sorting condition of either Comfort or Discomfort. Multidimensional scaling (MDS) was utilized to examine the structural perceptual equivalence of comfort/discomfort conditions on the sorting task. Results indicate that there is little difference in dimensional solutions for comfort versus discomfort, furthermore post hoc inspection of the dimensions and stimuli suggest the participants are using handle length (Dim 1), handle circumference (Dim 2), and surface texture (Dim 3) to group the knife handles. Support for a more in-depth study of comfort/discomfort incorporating attribute ratings and implications for designers are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages574-577
Number of pages4
StatePublished - Dec 1 2000
EventProceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, 'Ergonomics for the New Millennnium' - San Diego, CA, United States
Duration: Jul 29 2000Aug 4 2000

Conference

ConferenceProceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, 'Ergonomics for the New Millennnium'
CountryUnited States
CitySan Diego, CA
Period7/29/008/4/00

Fingerprint

Hand tools
Sorting
aesthetics
multidimensional scaling
Textures
equivalence
Inspection
stimulus
rating
Group

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics

Cite this

Christensen, A. D., & Bishu, R. R. (2000). Hand tools design: Are biomechanical criteria the same as aesthetic criteria? A preliminary study. 574-577. Paper presented at Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, 'Ergonomics for the New Millennnium', San Diego, CA, United States.

Hand tools design : Are biomechanical criteria the same as aesthetic criteria? A preliminary study. / Christensen, Adam D.; Bishu, Ramaratnam R.

2000. 574-577 Paper presented at Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, 'Ergonomics for the New Millennnium', San Diego, CA, United States.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Christensen, AD & Bishu, RR 2000, 'Hand tools design: Are biomechanical criteria the same as aesthetic criteria? A preliminary study' Paper presented at Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, 'Ergonomics for the New Millennnium', San Diego, CA, United States, 7/29/00 - 8/4/00, pp. 574-577.
Christensen AD, Bishu RR. Hand tools design: Are biomechanical criteria the same as aesthetic criteria? A preliminary study. 2000. Paper presented at Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, 'Ergonomics for the New Millennnium', San Diego, CA, United States.
Christensen, Adam D. ; Bishu, Ramaratnam R. / Hand tools design : Are biomechanical criteria the same as aesthetic criteria? A preliminary study. Paper presented at Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, 'Ergonomics for the New Millennnium', San Diego, CA, United States.4 p.
@conference{da8698fdfd2d4ea49ef9f7d404aa1646,
title = "Hand tools design: Are biomechanical criteria the same as aesthetic criteria? A preliminary study",
abstract = "The perception of comfort and discomfort was investigated using a tactile knife-handle sorting task. Sixteen participants (13 males, 3 females) volunteered to perform the study. Due to the preliminary nature of this research the participants were acquaintances of the researchers. The participants were randomly assigned to sorting condition of either Comfort or Discomfort. Multidimensional scaling (MDS) was utilized to examine the structural perceptual equivalence of comfort/discomfort conditions on the sorting task. Results indicate that there is little difference in dimensional solutions for comfort versus discomfort, furthermore post hoc inspection of the dimensions and stimuli suggest the participants are using handle length (Dim 1), handle circumference (Dim 2), and surface texture (Dim 3) to group the knife handles. Support for a more in-depth study of comfort/discomfort incorporating attribute ratings and implications for designers are discussed.",
author = "Christensen, {Adam D.} and Bishu, {Ramaratnam R}",
year = "2000",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "574--577",
note = "Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association, 'Ergonomics for the New Millennnium' ; Conference date: 29-07-2000 Through 04-08-2000",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Hand tools design

T2 - Are biomechanical criteria the same as aesthetic criteria? A preliminary study

AU - Christensen, Adam D.

AU - Bishu, Ramaratnam R

PY - 2000/12/1

Y1 - 2000/12/1

N2 - The perception of comfort and discomfort was investigated using a tactile knife-handle sorting task. Sixteen participants (13 males, 3 females) volunteered to perform the study. Due to the preliminary nature of this research the participants were acquaintances of the researchers. The participants were randomly assigned to sorting condition of either Comfort or Discomfort. Multidimensional scaling (MDS) was utilized to examine the structural perceptual equivalence of comfort/discomfort conditions on the sorting task. Results indicate that there is little difference in dimensional solutions for comfort versus discomfort, furthermore post hoc inspection of the dimensions and stimuli suggest the participants are using handle length (Dim 1), handle circumference (Dim 2), and surface texture (Dim 3) to group the knife handles. Support for a more in-depth study of comfort/discomfort incorporating attribute ratings and implications for designers are discussed.

AB - The perception of comfort and discomfort was investigated using a tactile knife-handle sorting task. Sixteen participants (13 males, 3 females) volunteered to perform the study. Due to the preliminary nature of this research the participants were acquaintances of the researchers. The participants were randomly assigned to sorting condition of either Comfort or Discomfort. Multidimensional scaling (MDS) was utilized to examine the structural perceptual equivalence of comfort/discomfort conditions on the sorting task. Results indicate that there is little difference in dimensional solutions for comfort versus discomfort, furthermore post hoc inspection of the dimensions and stimuli suggest the participants are using handle length (Dim 1), handle circumference (Dim 2), and surface texture (Dim 3) to group the knife handles. Support for a more in-depth study of comfort/discomfort incorporating attribute ratings and implications for designers are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1842660217&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1842660217&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Paper

SP - 574

EP - 577

ER -