Habitat associations of small mammals at two spatial scales in the northern Sierra Nevada

Stephanie A. Coppeto, Douglas A. Kelt, Dirk H. Van Vuren, James A Wilson, Seth Bigelow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Effective management strategies require an understanding of the spatial scale at which fauna use their habitat. Toward this end, we sampled small mammals in the northern Sierra Nevada, California, over 2 years at 18 livetrapping grids among 5 forest types. Forest types were defined by overstory tree composition, and 19 microhabitat variables were measured at all trap stations. Forest type and year explained 93% of variation in abundance of North American deermice (Peromyscus maniculatus), whereas only 40% was explained by microhabitat and year. Similarly, variation in abundance of long-eared and shadow chipmunks (Neotamias quadrimaculatus and W. senex) was better explained by forest type and year (67%) than by microhabitat and year (30%). Red fir (Abies magnified) forests supported more P. maniculatus and Neotamias species than mixed-conifer and pine-cedar forests, and more Neotamias species than mixed-fir forests. Five of 6 uncommon species were significantly associated with forest type; golden-mantled ground squirrels (Spermophilus lateralis), northern flying squirrels (Glaucomys sabrinus), and long-tailed and montane voles (Microtus longicaudus and M. montanus) were captured almost exclusively in red fir forests, whereas dusky-footed woodrats (Neotoma fuscipes) and California ground squirrels (Spermophilus beecheyi) were found in pine-cedar, mixed-fir, and mixed-conifer forests. The first 2 axes of a canonical correspondence analysis on microhabitat variables explained 71% of variation in combined small mammal abundance. Microhabitat associations varied among species but were driven primarily by canopy openness, shrub cover, and shrub richness. Although much of the small mammal fauna appeared to select habitat at both spatial scales studied, canonical correspondence analysis using forest type as a covariate revealed that microhabitat explained much less variation in small mammal abundance than did forest type.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)402-413
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Mammalogy
Volume87
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2006

Fingerprint

small mammal
small mammals
forest types
Ecosystem
Mammals
microhabitats
Sciuridae
habitat
microhabitat
habitats
Abies magnifica
Abies
Glaucomys sabrinus
Peromyscus maniculatus
squirrels
Coniferophyta
Spermophilus beecheyi
shrubs
Pinus
fauna

Keywords

  • California
  • Canonical correspondence analysis
  • Coniferous forests
  • Macrohabitat
  • Microhabitat
  • Sierra Nevada
  • Small mammals
  • Spatial scale

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology
  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Genetics
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Habitat associations of small mammals at two spatial scales in the northern Sierra Nevada. / Coppeto, Stephanie A.; Kelt, Douglas A.; Van Vuren, Dirk H.; Wilson, James A; Bigelow, Seth.

In: Journal of Mammalogy, Vol. 87, No. 2, 01.04.2006, p. 402-413.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Coppeto, Stephanie A. ; Kelt, Douglas A. ; Van Vuren, Dirk H. ; Wilson, James A ; Bigelow, Seth. / Habitat associations of small mammals at two spatial scales in the northern Sierra Nevada. In: Journal of Mammalogy. 2006 ; Vol. 87, No. 2. pp. 402-413.
@article{310e45e355f2424093327ad2b710e563,
title = "Habitat associations of small mammals at two spatial scales in the northern Sierra Nevada",
abstract = "Effective management strategies require an understanding of the spatial scale at which fauna use their habitat. Toward this end, we sampled small mammals in the northern Sierra Nevada, California, over 2 years at 18 livetrapping grids among 5 forest types. Forest types were defined by overstory tree composition, and 19 microhabitat variables were measured at all trap stations. Forest type and year explained 93{\%} of variation in abundance of North American deermice (Peromyscus maniculatus), whereas only 40{\%} was explained by microhabitat and year. Similarly, variation in abundance of long-eared and shadow chipmunks (Neotamias quadrimaculatus and W. senex) was better explained by forest type and year (67{\%}) than by microhabitat and year (30{\%}). Red fir (Abies magnified) forests supported more P. maniculatus and Neotamias species than mixed-conifer and pine-cedar forests, and more Neotamias species than mixed-fir forests. Five of 6 uncommon species were significantly associated with forest type; golden-mantled ground squirrels (Spermophilus lateralis), northern flying squirrels (Glaucomys sabrinus), and long-tailed and montane voles (Microtus longicaudus and M. montanus) were captured almost exclusively in red fir forests, whereas dusky-footed woodrats (Neotoma fuscipes) and California ground squirrels (Spermophilus beecheyi) were found in pine-cedar, mixed-fir, and mixed-conifer forests. The first 2 axes of a canonical correspondence analysis on microhabitat variables explained 71{\%} of variation in combined small mammal abundance. Microhabitat associations varied among species but were driven primarily by canopy openness, shrub cover, and shrub richness. Although much of the small mammal fauna appeared to select habitat at both spatial scales studied, canonical correspondence analysis using forest type as a covariate revealed that microhabitat explained much less variation in small mammal abundance than did forest type.",
keywords = "California, Canonical correspondence analysis, Coniferous forests, Macrohabitat, Microhabitat, Sierra Nevada, Small mammals, Spatial scale",
author = "Coppeto, {Stephanie A.} and Kelt, {Douglas A.} and {Van Vuren}, {Dirk H.} and Wilson, {James A} and Seth Bigelow",
year = "2006",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1644/05-MAMM-A-086R1.1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "87",
pages = "402--413",
journal = "Journal of Mammalogy",
issn = "0022-2372",
publisher = "Allen Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Habitat associations of small mammals at two spatial scales in the northern Sierra Nevada

AU - Coppeto, Stephanie A.

AU - Kelt, Douglas A.

AU - Van Vuren, Dirk H.

AU - Wilson, James A

AU - Bigelow, Seth

PY - 2006/4/1

Y1 - 2006/4/1

N2 - Effective management strategies require an understanding of the spatial scale at which fauna use their habitat. Toward this end, we sampled small mammals in the northern Sierra Nevada, California, over 2 years at 18 livetrapping grids among 5 forest types. Forest types were defined by overstory tree composition, and 19 microhabitat variables were measured at all trap stations. Forest type and year explained 93% of variation in abundance of North American deermice (Peromyscus maniculatus), whereas only 40% was explained by microhabitat and year. Similarly, variation in abundance of long-eared and shadow chipmunks (Neotamias quadrimaculatus and W. senex) was better explained by forest type and year (67%) than by microhabitat and year (30%). Red fir (Abies magnified) forests supported more P. maniculatus and Neotamias species than mixed-conifer and pine-cedar forests, and more Neotamias species than mixed-fir forests. Five of 6 uncommon species were significantly associated with forest type; golden-mantled ground squirrels (Spermophilus lateralis), northern flying squirrels (Glaucomys sabrinus), and long-tailed and montane voles (Microtus longicaudus and M. montanus) were captured almost exclusively in red fir forests, whereas dusky-footed woodrats (Neotoma fuscipes) and California ground squirrels (Spermophilus beecheyi) were found in pine-cedar, mixed-fir, and mixed-conifer forests. The first 2 axes of a canonical correspondence analysis on microhabitat variables explained 71% of variation in combined small mammal abundance. Microhabitat associations varied among species but were driven primarily by canopy openness, shrub cover, and shrub richness. Although much of the small mammal fauna appeared to select habitat at both spatial scales studied, canonical correspondence analysis using forest type as a covariate revealed that microhabitat explained much less variation in small mammal abundance than did forest type.

AB - Effective management strategies require an understanding of the spatial scale at which fauna use their habitat. Toward this end, we sampled small mammals in the northern Sierra Nevada, California, over 2 years at 18 livetrapping grids among 5 forest types. Forest types were defined by overstory tree composition, and 19 microhabitat variables were measured at all trap stations. Forest type and year explained 93% of variation in abundance of North American deermice (Peromyscus maniculatus), whereas only 40% was explained by microhabitat and year. Similarly, variation in abundance of long-eared and shadow chipmunks (Neotamias quadrimaculatus and W. senex) was better explained by forest type and year (67%) than by microhabitat and year (30%). Red fir (Abies magnified) forests supported more P. maniculatus and Neotamias species than mixed-conifer and pine-cedar forests, and more Neotamias species than mixed-fir forests. Five of 6 uncommon species were significantly associated with forest type; golden-mantled ground squirrels (Spermophilus lateralis), northern flying squirrels (Glaucomys sabrinus), and long-tailed and montane voles (Microtus longicaudus and M. montanus) were captured almost exclusively in red fir forests, whereas dusky-footed woodrats (Neotoma fuscipes) and California ground squirrels (Spermophilus beecheyi) were found in pine-cedar, mixed-fir, and mixed-conifer forests. The first 2 axes of a canonical correspondence analysis on microhabitat variables explained 71% of variation in combined small mammal abundance. Microhabitat associations varied among species but were driven primarily by canopy openness, shrub cover, and shrub richness. Although much of the small mammal fauna appeared to select habitat at both spatial scales studied, canonical correspondence analysis using forest type as a covariate revealed that microhabitat explained much less variation in small mammal abundance than did forest type.

KW - California

KW - Canonical correspondence analysis

KW - Coniferous forests

KW - Macrohabitat

KW - Microhabitat

KW - Sierra Nevada

KW - Small mammals

KW - Spatial scale

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646232226&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646232226&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1644/05-MAMM-A-086R1.1

DO - 10.1644/05-MAMM-A-086R1.1

M3 - Article

VL - 87

SP - 402

EP - 413

JO - Journal of Mammalogy

JF - Journal of Mammalogy

SN - 0022-2372

IS - 2

ER -