Graduating dental students' ability to produce quality root canal fillings using single-or multiple-cone obturation techniques

Tom G. Gound, James P. Sather, Tae S. Kong, Hany M Makkawy, David B. Marx

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The primary purposes of this study were to compare the quality (length and density) and efficiency (time to completion) of obturation when single- or multiple-cone obturation techniques were used by graduating dental school students on previously instrumented single-canalled teeth using simulated clinical conditions in vitro. Five students took part in the study, each of whom obturated thirty-six teeth using six obturation techniques. The multiple-cone techniques included lateral condensation of gutta-percha, the technique the students had used in their laboratory and clinical courses, and two similar variations: lateral condensation of Epiphany and mechanical lateral condensation of gutta-percha. These three methods were compared to three single-cone techniques: Thermafil, Activ GP, and GuttaFlow. The students had no experience with single-cone techniques except for a brief introduction and demonstration. All obturations were timed, and post-obturation radiographs were taken in the clinical and proximal views (CV and PV). The radiographs were read by two endodontic faculty members who were blinded to technique, student, and fellow faculty member's results. Data were also separated by operator experience with individual techniques: the first three obturations/techniques were compared to the final three obturations/techniques. Data were analyzed using chi-square tests. The quality produced or time required rarely differed within multiple-cone or single-cone groups, but statistical differences did occur between the two groups. Multiple-cone obturation was more likely to produce adequate length (p=0.0042), density in the CV (p=0.0056), and density in the PV (p=0.0003). Conversely, the single-cone techniques were significantly faster (mean 350 seconds) than the multiple-cone techniques (mean 464 seconds) (p=0.0020). Quality did not improve significantly with the experienced groups versus the inexperienced with any of the six techniques, but the mean time for obturation decreased from 449 seconds to 362 seconds. These preliminary findings suggest that further training and experience are needed to improve the quality of obturation produced when single-cone techniques are used. Further research is needed to determine how much training and/or experience will be needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)696-705
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of dental education
Volume73
Issue number6
StatePublished - Jun 1 2009

Fingerprint

Dental Students
Dental Pulp Cavity
Students
Gutta-Percha
ability
Tooth
student
experience
Dental Schools
Endodontics
Chi-Square Distribution
Group
efficiency
Research
school
time

Keywords

  • Dental education
  • Efficiency
  • Endodontics
  • Multiple-cone obturation techniques
  • Quality
  • Single-cone obturation techniques

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Graduating dental students' ability to produce quality root canal fillings using single-or multiple-cone obturation techniques. / Gound, Tom G.; Sather, James P.; Kong, Tae S.; Makkawy, Hany M; Marx, David B.

In: Journal of dental education, Vol. 73, No. 6, 01.06.2009, p. 696-705.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b9ae0ac94df148fcba50cd4189be3af1,
title = "Graduating dental students' ability to produce quality root canal fillings using single-or multiple-cone obturation techniques",
abstract = "The primary purposes of this study were to compare the quality (length and density) and efficiency (time to completion) of obturation when single- or multiple-cone obturation techniques were used by graduating dental school students on previously instrumented single-canalled teeth using simulated clinical conditions in vitro. Five students took part in the study, each of whom obturated thirty-six teeth using six obturation techniques. The multiple-cone techniques included lateral condensation of gutta-percha, the technique the students had used in their laboratory and clinical courses, and two similar variations: lateral condensation of Epiphany and mechanical lateral condensation of gutta-percha. These three methods were compared to three single-cone techniques: Thermafil, Activ GP, and GuttaFlow. The students had no experience with single-cone techniques except for a brief introduction and demonstration. All obturations were timed, and post-obturation radiographs were taken in the clinical and proximal views (CV and PV). The radiographs were read by two endodontic faculty members who were blinded to technique, student, and fellow faculty member's results. Data were also separated by operator experience with individual techniques: the first three obturations/techniques were compared to the final three obturations/techniques. Data were analyzed using chi-square tests. The quality produced or time required rarely differed within multiple-cone or single-cone groups, but statistical differences did occur between the two groups. Multiple-cone obturation was more likely to produce adequate length (p=0.0042), density in the CV (p=0.0056), and density in the PV (p=0.0003). Conversely, the single-cone techniques were significantly faster (mean 350 seconds) than the multiple-cone techniques (mean 464 seconds) (p=0.0020). Quality did not improve significantly with the experienced groups versus the inexperienced with any of the six techniques, but the mean time for obturation decreased from 449 seconds to 362 seconds. These preliminary findings suggest that further training and experience are needed to improve the quality of obturation produced when single-cone techniques are used. Further research is needed to determine how much training and/or experience will be needed.",
keywords = "Dental education, Efficiency, Endodontics, Multiple-cone obturation techniques, Quality, Single-cone obturation techniques",
author = "Gound, {Tom G.} and Sather, {James P.} and Kong, {Tae S.} and Makkawy, {Hany M} and Marx, {David B.}",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "73",
pages = "696--705",
journal = "Journal of Dental Education",
issn = "0022-0337",
publisher = "American Dental Education Association",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Graduating dental students' ability to produce quality root canal fillings using single-or multiple-cone obturation techniques

AU - Gound, Tom G.

AU - Sather, James P.

AU - Kong, Tae S.

AU - Makkawy, Hany M

AU - Marx, David B.

PY - 2009/6/1

Y1 - 2009/6/1

N2 - The primary purposes of this study were to compare the quality (length and density) and efficiency (time to completion) of obturation when single- or multiple-cone obturation techniques were used by graduating dental school students on previously instrumented single-canalled teeth using simulated clinical conditions in vitro. Five students took part in the study, each of whom obturated thirty-six teeth using six obturation techniques. The multiple-cone techniques included lateral condensation of gutta-percha, the technique the students had used in their laboratory and clinical courses, and two similar variations: lateral condensation of Epiphany and mechanical lateral condensation of gutta-percha. These three methods were compared to three single-cone techniques: Thermafil, Activ GP, and GuttaFlow. The students had no experience with single-cone techniques except for a brief introduction and demonstration. All obturations were timed, and post-obturation radiographs were taken in the clinical and proximal views (CV and PV). The radiographs were read by two endodontic faculty members who were blinded to technique, student, and fellow faculty member's results. Data were also separated by operator experience with individual techniques: the first three obturations/techniques were compared to the final three obturations/techniques. Data were analyzed using chi-square tests. The quality produced or time required rarely differed within multiple-cone or single-cone groups, but statistical differences did occur between the two groups. Multiple-cone obturation was more likely to produce adequate length (p=0.0042), density in the CV (p=0.0056), and density in the PV (p=0.0003). Conversely, the single-cone techniques were significantly faster (mean 350 seconds) than the multiple-cone techniques (mean 464 seconds) (p=0.0020). Quality did not improve significantly with the experienced groups versus the inexperienced with any of the six techniques, but the mean time for obturation decreased from 449 seconds to 362 seconds. These preliminary findings suggest that further training and experience are needed to improve the quality of obturation produced when single-cone techniques are used. Further research is needed to determine how much training and/or experience will be needed.

AB - The primary purposes of this study were to compare the quality (length and density) and efficiency (time to completion) of obturation when single- or multiple-cone obturation techniques were used by graduating dental school students on previously instrumented single-canalled teeth using simulated clinical conditions in vitro. Five students took part in the study, each of whom obturated thirty-six teeth using six obturation techniques. The multiple-cone techniques included lateral condensation of gutta-percha, the technique the students had used in their laboratory and clinical courses, and two similar variations: lateral condensation of Epiphany and mechanical lateral condensation of gutta-percha. These three methods were compared to three single-cone techniques: Thermafil, Activ GP, and GuttaFlow. The students had no experience with single-cone techniques except for a brief introduction and demonstration. All obturations were timed, and post-obturation radiographs were taken in the clinical and proximal views (CV and PV). The radiographs were read by two endodontic faculty members who were blinded to technique, student, and fellow faculty member's results. Data were also separated by operator experience with individual techniques: the first three obturations/techniques were compared to the final three obturations/techniques. Data were analyzed using chi-square tests. The quality produced or time required rarely differed within multiple-cone or single-cone groups, but statistical differences did occur between the two groups. Multiple-cone obturation was more likely to produce adequate length (p=0.0042), density in the CV (p=0.0056), and density in the PV (p=0.0003). Conversely, the single-cone techniques were significantly faster (mean 350 seconds) than the multiple-cone techniques (mean 464 seconds) (p=0.0020). Quality did not improve significantly with the experienced groups versus the inexperienced with any of the six techniques, but the mean time for obturation decreased from 449 seconds to 362 seconds. These preliminary findings suggest that further training and experience are needed to improve the quality of obturation produced when single-cone techniques are used. Further research is needed to determine how much training and/or experience will be needed.

KW - Dental education

KW - Efficiency

KW - Endodontics

KW - Multiple-cone obturation techniques

KW - Quality

KW - Single-cone obturation techniques

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67650711017&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67650711017&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 19491347

AN - SCOPUS:67650711017

VL - 73

SP - 696

EP - 705

JO - Journal of Dental Education

JF - Journal of Dental Education

SN - 0022-0337

IS - 6

ER -