Getting on the radar screen: Homeschooling litigation as agenda setting, 1972-2007

Steven A. Boutcher, Anne Kathrin Kronberg, Regina E. Werum

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Since the legalization of homeschooling in 1972, litigation by homeschooling adversaries has shaped the legal frameworks regulating its practice. Adjudicating between complementary theoretical claims, we examine whether homeschooling litigation trends-specifically the ability of either side to set the agenda by getting on court dockets-reflect concerns over contentious educational practices and policies or broader cultural and political dynamics. We employ a unique longitudinal dataset on precedent-setting state and federal cases (1972-2007). Analyses show that litigation trends remained largely unaffected by changing educational dynamics, except via racialized status competition dynamics. Instead, litigation trends primarily reflect political and cultural factors, including the liberalization of public attitudes on socially contentious issues. Most importantly, mobilization and countermobilization dynamics have driven the ability of homeschooling rivals to use the courts for agenda-setting purposes. Our results highlight how political and cultural contexts shape movements' ability to set policy agendas through the courts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)159-180
Number of pages22
JournalMobilization
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2018

Fingerprint

ability
trend
legalization
political factors
educational practice
cultural factors
educational policy
liberalization
mobilization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Getting on the radar screen : Homeschooling litigation as agenda setting, 1972-2007. / Boutcher, Steven A.; Kronberg, Anne Kathrin; Werum, Regina E.

In: Mobilization, Vol. 23, No. 2, 06.2018, p. 159-180.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Boutcher, Steven A. ; Kronberg, Anne Kathrin ; Werum, Regina E. / Getting on the radar screen : Homeschooling litigation as agenda setting, 1972-2007. In: Mobilization. 2018 ; Vol. 23, No. 2. pp. 159-180.
@article{afb01ece6bd14c569041a2fed5cf344b,
title = "Getting on the radar screen: Homeschooling litigation as agenda setting, 1972-2007",
abstract = "Since the legalization of homeschooling in 1972, litigation by homeschooling adversaries has shaped the legal frameworks regulating its practice. Adjudicating between complementary theoretical claims, we examine whether homeschooling litigation trends-specifically the ability of either side to set the agenda by getting on court dockets-reflect concerns over contentious educational practices and policies or broader cultural and political dynamics. We employ a unique longitudinal dataset on precedent-setting state and federal cases (1972-2007). Analyses show that litigation trends remained largely unaffected by changing educational dynamics, except via racialized status competition dynamics. Instead, litigation trends primarily reflect political and cultural factors, including the liberalization of public attitudes on socially contentious issues. Most importantly, mobilization and countermobilization dynamics have driven the ability of homeschooling rivals to use the courts for agenda-setting purposes. Our results highlight how political and cultural contexts shape movements' ability to set policy agendas through the courts.",
author = "Boutcher, {Steven A.} and Kronberg, {Anne Kathrin} and Werum, {Regina E.}",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
doi = "10.17813/1086-671X-23-2-159",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "159--180",
journal = "Mobilization",
issn = "1086-671X",
publisher = "San Diego State University",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Getting on the radar screen

T2 - Homeschooling litigation as agenda setting, 1972-2007

AU - Boutcher, Steven A.

AU - Kronberg, Anne Kathrin

AU - Werum, Regina E.

PY - 2018/6

Y1 - 2018/6

N2 - Since the legalization of homeschooling in 1972, litigation by homeschooling adversaries has shaped the legal frameworks regulating its practice. Adjudicating between complementary theoretical claims, we examine whether homeschooling litigation trends-specifically the ability of either side to set the agenda by getting on court dockets-reflect concerns over contentious educational practices and policies or broader cultural and political dynamics. We employ a unique longitudinal dataset on precedent-setting state and federal cases (1972-2007). Analyses show that litigation trends remained largely unaffected by changing educational dynamics, except via racialized status competition dynamics. Instead, litigation trends primarily reflect political and cultural factors, including the liberalization of public attitudes on socially contentious issues. Most importantly, mobilization and countermobilization dynamics have driven the ability of homeschooling rivals to use the courts for agenda-setting purposes. Our results highlight how political and cultural contexts shape movements' ability to set policy agendas through the courts.

AB - Since the legalization of homeschooling in 1972, litigation by homeschooling adversaries has shaped the legal frameworks regulating its practice. Adjudicating between complementary theoretical claims, we examine whether homeschooling litigation trends-specifically the ability of either side to set the agenda by getting on court dockets-reflect concerns over contentious educational practices and policies or broader cultural and political dynamics. We employ a unique longitudinal dataset on precedent-setting state and federal cases (1972-2007). Analyses show that litigation trends remained largely unaffected by changing educational dynamics, except via racialized status competition dynamics. Instead, litigation trends primarily reflect political and cultural factors, including the liberalization of public attitudes on socially contentious issues. Most importantly, mobilization and countermobilization dynamics have driven the ability of homeschooling rivals to use the courts for agenda-setting purposes. Our results highlight how political and cultural contexts shape movements' ability to set policy agendas through the courts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054874899&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054874899&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.17813/1086-671X-23-2-159

DO - 10.17813/1086-671X-23-2-159

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85054874899

VL - 23

SP - 159

EP - 180

JO - Mobilization

JF - Mobilization

SN - 1086-671X

IS - 2

ER -